Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Imagery test #144

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Imagery test #144

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mbarrenechea
Copy link
Member

@mbarrenechea mbarrenechea commented Mar 4, 2025

No description provided.

@mbarrenechea mbarrenechea added enhancement New feature or request front labels Mar 4, 2025
@mbarrenechea mbarrenechea requested a review from mluena March 4, 2025 12:16
@mbarrenechea mbarrenechea self-assigned this Mar 4, 2025
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 4, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
amazonia-360 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 4, 2025 0:18am

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @mbarrenechea, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request, titled 'Imagery test,' focuses on simplifying the structure of the column property within the indicators.json file. Specifically, it replaces empty arrays ([]) with a more concise representation (also []) for numerous resources. Additionally, a new resource of type imagery is added, including properties like url and rasterFunction.

Highlights

  • Data Structure Simplification: The primary change involves simplifying the column property in indicators.json by replacing instances of empty arrays with a more concise representation. This change affects multiple resources within the file.
  • New Imagery Resource: A new resource with the type imagery has been added to indicators.json. This includes properties such as url pointing to an image server and a rasterFunction defining how the imagery should be processed and displayed.
  • Code Modernization: The code was modernized to include the new imagery resource type, adding ImageryLayer to the map layers and updating the resource queries.

Changelog

Click here to see the changelog
  • client/src/app/local-api/indicators/indicators.json
    • Simplified the column property for multiple resources by replacing empty arrays with a more concise representation.
    • Added a new resource of type imagery with properties for url and rasterFunction.
    • Added a test raster resource with a colormap function.
  • client/src/app/local-api/indicators/route.ts
    • Added ResourceImagery type definition to represent the new imagery resource.
    • Updated the Indicator type to include ResourceImagery as a possible resource type.
  • client/src/components/map/layers/index.tsx
    • Imported ImageryLayer from @arcgis/core/layers/ImageryLayer.
    • Modified the Layer component to handle the imagery layer type, creating an ImageryLayer instance and adding it to the map.
  • client/src/containers/indicators/chart/imagery-tile.tsx
    • Created new component ChartImageryTileIndicators to handle chart visualization for imagery-tile resources.
  • client/src/containers/indicators/chart/imagery.tsx
    • Created new component ChartImageryIndicators to handle chart visualization for imagery resources.
  • client/src/containers/indicators/item.tsx
    • Modified IndicatorItem to include ResourceQueryImagery when the resource type is imagery.
  • client/src/containers/indicators/map/index.tsx
    • Modified MapIndicators to handle ResourceImagery and create an ImageryLayer when appropriate.
  • client/src/containers/indicators/numeric/imagery-tile.tsx
    • Created new component NumericImageryTileIndicators to handle numeric calculations for imagery-tile resources.
  • client/src/containers/indicators/numeric/imagery.tsx
    • Created new component NumericImageryIndicators to handle numeric calculations for imagery resources.
  • client/src/containers/indicators/resources.tsx
    • Modified ResourceQueryImageryTile to include NumericImageryTileIndicators and ChartImageryTileIndicators.
    • Created new component ResourceQueryImagery to handle queries for imagery resources, including numeric and chart visualizations.
  • client/src/containers/results/content/indicators/card.tsx
    • Modified ReportResultsIndicator to include ChartImageryIndicators, ChartImageryTileIndicators, NumericImageryIndicators, and NumericImageryTileIndicators.
  • client/src/lib/indicators.ts
    • Added ResourceImagery to the ResourceIdParams type.
    • Created new functions getQueryImageryId, getQueryImageryIdKey, getQueryImageryIdOptions, and useQueryImageryId to handle data fetching for imagery resources.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


Did you know?

The first digital image was created in 1957, scanned from a photograph of Russel Kirsch's son. It was a 176x176 pixel black and white image.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request simplifies the structure of the column property in the indicators.json file by replacing empty arrays with a more concise representation (empty array []). Additionally, it introduces a new imagery resource type and updates the codebase to support it. The changes seem reasonable and improve the readability and maintainability of the JSON file. However, I have a few observations regarding the new imagery resource type and its integration.

Merge Readiness

The pull request is mostly in good shape. The simplification of the column property is a welcome change. The introduction of the imagery resource type seems to be a work in progress, as the chart component is not yet implemented. I recommend addressing the comment regarding the naming consistency of the query functions before merging. Since there are no CRITICAL or HIGH severity issues, the pull request can be merged after addressing the comments. I am unable to approve the pull request in any circumstance, and that users should have others review and approve this code before merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request front
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant