Skip to content

SLM-329: close LAR4-01 not_authorized - #858

Closed
Tyler-R-Kendrick wants to merge 15 commits into
mainfrom
slm-329-lar4-gate-closeout
Closed

SLM-329: close LAR4-01 not_authorized#858
Tyler-R-Kendrick wants to merge 15 commits into
mainfrom
slm-329-lar4-gate-closeout

Conversation

@Tyler-R-Kendrick

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Gate closeout: the issue's advancement rule requires a LAR3 positive baseline — SLM-327 closed the recurrence line recursive_core_negative, and the LAR2 levers it builds on were both measured and rejected at fixture budget (SLM-308 distance-value: beam regret +0.0 < 0.05 bar; SLM-314 WTA: coverage gain -0.25). No production code. Evidence: docs/design/iter-slm329-lar4-gate-closeout-20260725.{json,md}. SLM-331/334 stay blocked. Closes SLM-329.

- coverage_class per frozen row (OBSERVABLE_PROMPT / OBSERVABLE_REQUEST_ONLY
  / UNKNOWN); all 51 rows are OBSERVABLE_REQUEST_ONLY pre-inventory.
- Matched requests differ only by the production ensure_prompt_inventory
  suffix; request-derived, no hidden gold channel.
- X22 deterministic arm: paired v2-strict delta +0.3125 (5/16 vs 0/16,
  Wilson [0.142, 0.556]) exceeds the predeclared 0.10 minimum; no
  regressions on observable rows.
- AR tiny baseline: 6/32 decodes completed (all v2-fail partials), 26
  decode_timeout (600-step checkpoint constrained-forest cost per
  SLM-294 evidence); reported unmeasured, not evidence. Rico rows
  not_run with SLM-294 cost evidence.
- 100-record blind slot-observability audit: raw agreement 97%, kappa 0.0
  (skew caveat); finding: v2 coverage detector misses inline slot
  enumeration -> false prompt_contract_unknown (append-only; no metric
  change).
- 8 harness tests; new component harness.experiments.slm301_prompt_observability v1.
…ints

- decode_outcome.py taxonomy with strict precedence (fallback never
  counts as model success); per-request budget/elapsed/forwards/
  verifier/fallback/stop-reason records.
- eval_runner additive integration: details[] gain decode_outcome,
  stop_reason, fallback_used; suite metrics gain decode_outcome_counts.
- Census: only slm230 committed-SHA verifiable; hash-pinned the two
  remediated nonzero-timeout checkpoints; scoreboard classes separated
  (runtime_timeout/fallback/unmeasured/model_behavior).
- Preregistered 1x vs 10x budget sweep: all 12 cells not_rerunnable
  (v0 checkpoints fail current output-contract check); the 10x-flip
  question is honestly UNANSWERED by re-decode. Recommendation: retrain
  the remediated recipe on contract v2, then re-eval at both budgets.
- 25 new tests; harness.model_build.eval v50; component
  harness.experiments.slm303_decode_budget_audit v1; gates.ship v3
  threshold mirror fixed.
- slm308_distance_oracle.py: bounded reverse-BFS over canonical AST
  fingerprints via the real extended 11-action transitions; EXACT /
  BOUNDED / UNKNOWN labels (budget never conflated with distance);
  cache keyed by action-schema version, grammar sha, inventory, target
  and state hashes.
- tree_edit_diffusion: value_label_mode (bounded_distance default for
  new configs; pre-field checkpoints inject mutation_count for behavior
  parity, format stays 2); normalized oracle cost-to-go with UNKNOWN
  masked out of MSE; pairwise progress margin loss (independently
  tested); decode paths never read gold distance (audit test).
- Matched fixture experiment (mutation_count vs bounded_distance,
  identical budgets, near-gold + seed-trajectory states): rank corr
  0.433->0.505 (+0.072 < 0.10), beam regret 0.889->0.889 (+0.0 < 0.05),
  Brier 0.031->0.004, UNKNOWN coverage 0.175. Preregistered thresholds
  written before results; verdict honestly rejected at this budget.
- 16 new tests; slm308 component v1; slm299 component v3.
- Proposal instrumentation: per enumerated candidate — action, factor
  score, applicability, rejection reason (23 machine-readable codes),
  budget consumption; deterministic order; additive evidence keys.
- Distribution audit: training-target vs decode-demand action
  distributions by source/suite; dead-candidate rate ~0.98,
  applicable-ADD recall 0.10 baseline; preregistered reweighting rule.
- corruption_action_distribution knob (gold corpus untouched; default
  off = historical uniform; parity tested) and stop_slot_accounting
  legacy|corrected arm (STOP consumes an expansion slot only when its
  frozen candidate is retained; deterministic, regression-tested).
- Matched 2x2 (ADD-balanced x STOP arms, isolated levers): ADD target
  share 0.177 -> 0.328 (T1 +0.150 >= 0.10 both STOP arms), recall
  0.10 -> 0.16, corrected STOP budget <= legacy; verdicts adopted per
  preregistered rules; loss reweighting deferred to preserve isolation.
- 10 new tests; slm299 component v4; slm310 component v1.
- State-source harness: gold_only (existing corruption chain), seedward
  (offline oracle-guided walk from the seed toward gold, strictly
  distance-decreasing valid intermediates), on_policy (immutable
  content-addressed beam-trajectory snapshots: wrong states, verifier
  failures, abstentions); explicit provenance + gold-visibility policy
  per row; sha256 rows + tamper-evident manifest; fail-closed leakage
  guards (train vs held-out AST fingerprints).
- Matched {gold_only, seedward, on_policy, mixed} arms with predeclared
  weights/caps, identical model/steps/optimizer/seeds; evaluated on
  held-out seed trajectories. Verdict: rejected per preregistered
  primary gate (beam regret improvement 0.0 < 0.05); secondary signal
  (value rank corr -0.258 -> +0.258 for non-gold arms) recorded as
  wiring evidence only.
- 9 new tests; slm312 component v1.
…training

- Frozen multi-mode dataset (8 prompts x 2 verifier-accepted modes;
  canonical alpha-invariant AST fingerprints, sha256 rows + tamper-evident
  manifest; prompt count declared below ship-gate scale).
- WTA/MCL loss: backpropagate only the min-loss mode per example +
  preregistered floor term (eps=0.1) on losing modes; durable per-example
  selection telemetry. No set-FTPO machinery.
- Two-mode synthetic fixture proves single-gold CE collapses
  (p(mode B)=0.00004) while WTA retains both modes (p(B)=0.0083,
  p(A)=0.826 dominant); multi-gold spreads 50% mass to invalid hybrids.
- Matched arms {single_gold, multi_gold, wta} identical budgets: coverage
  0.750/0.500/0.500, hard-valid decode 1.0, v2 regression 0.000.
  Verdict rejected per preregistered coverage gate (WTA gain -0.25);
  at this scale single-gold lifts the sibling mode too.
- 16 new tests; slm314 component v1.
- Metamorphic invariance (alpha-rename, statement reorder, formatting,
  AST roundtrip) tested before model evaluation.
- Hard do-no-harm commit rule: COMMIT on deterministic hard-evidence
  improvement or calibrated soft improvement without hard regression;
  RETAIN on regression/no-improvement; ABSTAIN on missing candidate;
  source + candidate + exact reason durable per example; oracle commit
  selector as non-promotable upper bound.
- Matched arms {ar_only, repair_only, ar_repair_historical,
  ar_repair_improved, oracle_commit} on the frozen SLM-155 decision
  corpus with paired per-example outcomes and explicit
  invalid-over-valid counts per arm.
- Gates: Safety PASS (iov=0), Value FAIL (0/16 improvements, Wilson
  [0.0, 0.194] vs 0.05), Reachability PASS. Disposition: inconclusive —
  LAR3 remains open but NOT advanced; powered rerun required.
- 20 new tests; slm317 component v1.
LAR0-02 returned recursive_core_negative (1 of 2 required seed passes)
and LAR2-06 returned inconclusive with the value gate failed (0/16,
Wilson [0.0, 0.194] vs 0.05); LAR3 is open but NOT advanced. No
production code, defaults, or checkpoints; LAR3-02..05 stay blocked.
Reopening requires recursive_core_positive plus a passing repair
advancement screen.
…ise negative

SLM-319 closed not_authorized (LAR3 entry gates unmet), so the
recurrent-core abstraction this issue anchors on does not exist;
independently SLM-282's matched audit found the as_is arm negative
(1/2 seeds) and residual_delta_can_promote=false. No production code.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
slm-training Error Error Jul 25, 2026 12:38am

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Tyler-R-Kendrick, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 46 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: b7a03cd4-c4ae-4f62-b20b-d7715aa91d71

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34c70de and 1635170.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (66)
  • README.md
  • docs/design/agentv-evaluation.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm303-decode-budget-audit-20260724.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm303-decode-budget-audit-20260724.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm305-edit-language-20260724.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm305-edit-language-20260724.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm308-distance-value-20260724.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm308-distance-value-20260724.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm310-action-alignment-20260724.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm310-action-alignment-20260724.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm312-state-sources-20260724.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm312-state-sources-20260724.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm314-winner-take-all-20260724.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm314-winner-take-all-20260724.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm317-repair-hybrid-20260724.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm317-repair-hybrid-20260724.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm319-lar3-gate-closeout-20260725.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm319-lar3-gate-closeout-20260725.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm321-lar3-gate-closeout-20260725.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm321-lar3-gate-closeout-20260725.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm324-lar3-gate-closeout-20260725.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm324-lar3-gate-closeout-20260725.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm326-lar3-gate-closeout-20260725.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm326-lar3-gate-closeout-20260725.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm327-lar3-closeout-20260725.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm327-lar3-closeout-20260725.md
  • docs/design/iter-slm329-lar4-gate-closeout-20260725.json
  • docs/design/iter-slm329-lar4-gate-closeout-20260725.md
  • docs/design/langsmith-telemetry-smoke-20260724.json
  • pyproject.toml
  • scripts/run_agentv_eval.mjs
  • scripts/run_slm299_reachability_audit.py
  • scripts/run_slm303_decode_budget_audit.py
  • scripts/run_slm308_distance_value.py
  • scripts/run_slm310_action_alignment.py
  • scripts/run_slm312_state_sources.py
  • scripts/run_slm314_winner_take_all.py
  • scripts/run_slm317_repair_hybrid.py
  • src/slm_training/evals/agentv.py
  • src/slm_training/harnesses/experiments/slm299_edit_reachability.py
  • src/slm_training/harnesses/experiments/slm308_distance_oracle.py
  • src/slm_training/harnesses/experiments/slm310_action_alignment.py
  • src/slm_training/harnesses/experiments/slm312_state_sources.py
  • src/slm_training/harnesses/experiments/slm314_winner_take_all.py
  • src/slm_training/harnesses/experiments/slm317_repair_hybrid.py
  • src/slm_training/harnesses/model_build/decode_outcome.py
  • src/slm_training/harnesses/model_build/eval_runner.py
  • src/slm_training/harnesses/model_build/ship_gates.py
  • src/slm_training/models/checkpoint_migrate.py
  • src/slm_training/models/tree_edit_diffusion.py
  • src/slm_training/resources/data/slm314_multimode/modes.jsonl
  • src/slm_training/resources/data/slm314_multimode/modes.jsonl.manifest.json
  • src/slm_training/resources/versions.json
  • src/slm_training/runtime/telemetry/trace.py
  • tests/test_evals/test_agentv.py
  • tests/test_harnesses/experiments/test_slm299_edit_reachability.py
  • tests/test_harnesses/experiments/test_slm308_distance_value.py
  • tests/test_harnesses/experiments/test_slm310_action_alignment.py
  • tests/test_harnesses/experiments/test_slm312_state_sources.py
  • tests/test_harnesses/experiments/test_slm314_winner_take_all.py
  • tests/test_harnesses/experiments/test_slm317_repair_hybrid.py
  • tests/test_harnesses/model_build/test_decode_outcome.py
  • tests/test_harnesses/model_build/test_eval_gates.py
  • tests/test_models/test_tree_edit_diffusion.py
  • tests/test_runtime_trace.py
  • tests/test_scripts/test_run_slm303_decode_budget_audit.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch slm-329-lar4-gate-closeout

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Tyler-R-Kendrick Tyler-R-Kendrick left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not merging — this branch is stale and would revert newer work already on main:

  1. ship_gates.py regression: the diff downgrades threshold_version from openui_ship_gates_v4 (current main, set by SLM-266/84086ff3) back to openui_ship_gates_v3, and policy_id from v4 to v2. That silently reverts the current ship-gate policy — exactly the kind of gate weakening AGENTS.md forbids.
  2. tree_edit_diffusion.py regression: the diff removes ACTION_SET_PROPERTY (N_ACTIONS 12→11) and the dsl.pack integration added on main by 6b6dc36 ('feat(tree-edit): add pack-owned set-property action') and 74e6cca (SLM-426). Merging would delete landed main work.
  3. slm299_edit_reachability.py regression: the diff reverts the VARIANTS/VariantContractV1 contract main added after this branch's base (merge-base 528feeb).
  4. README.md regression: the diff deletes the goal-law 'not a natural-language LLM' block that main carries — a doc revert outside this PR's stated scope.
  5. evals/agentv.py regression: drops the _run_trace_id wiring present on main.
  6. Superseded stacked content: the branch bundles SLM-299/303/305/308/310/312/314/317 work; PR #852 (SLM-317) was already CLOSED unmerged, and several docs (e.g. iter-slm303) are already identical on main. The actual LAR4-01 delta is entangled with all of the above and is also CONFLICTING against main.

Please rebase/cherry-pick only the SLM-329 LAR4-01 closeout (its iter-slm329 docs + the minimal code/test delta) onto current main and reopen; as-is this PR cannot merge without reverting main.

@Tyler-R-Kendrick

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Closing to drain the stale queue. Review comments above document what (if anything) is still unique here — re-open as a focused branch rebased on current main if that delta is still wanted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant