Skip to content

autotrain(continuous-openui-20260808): continuous loop closeout docs (screening, non-positive) - #1504

Merged
Tyler-R-Kendrick merged 32 commits into
mainfrom
claude/great-dirac-w92s3f
Aug 8, 2026
Merged

autotrain(continuous-openui-20260808): continuous loop closeout docs (screening, non-positive)#1504
Tyler-R-Kendrick merged 32 commits into
mainfrom
claude/great-dirac-w92s3f

Conversation

@Tyler-R-Kendrick

@Tyler-R-Kendrick Tyler-R-Kendrick commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Runs the autotrain skill's continuous-mode loop (scripts.run_autotrain_supervisor) against a fresh python3.12 venv + JS grammar-bridge install, tracked as loop-id continuous-openui-20260808.
  • Cycles 1-3 completed: fixture-scale wf_smoke_v2 screening arms against the honest ship gates. All three cycles are non-positive (fixture insufficient_n, null primary-metric deltas, or measurement timeouts) per the autotrain-iteration-delivery positive-result gate, so no stacked model/harness layer is opened yet — this PR only carries the iron-law documentation the driver produced.
  • Includes three no-bump version-stamp history entries for harness.experiments.slm228_spectral_disposition (its registry watches README.md/docs/MODEL_CARD.md, which the continuous driver's closeout note touches every cycle); behavior of that harness is unchanged.

Changes

  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c1-results.{md,json} — cycle 1 (control/bounds arms, ship gates rejected as expected on fixture n)
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c2-results.{md,json} — cycle 2 (both arms hit measurement timeout; retried in cycle 3)
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.{md,json} — cycle 3 (component-plan vs control; control decode-timeout reproduced, candidate quality-rejected)
  • docs/MODEL_CARD.md, README.md — continuous autotrain scratch-checkpoint provenance notes for each cycle
  • src/slm_training/resources/versions.json — 3 no-bump history entries (dated 2026-08-08) for harness.experiments.slm228_spectral_disposition

Test plan

  • python -m scripts.verify_version_stamps --check passes on every committed cycle
  • Each cycle's honest ship-gate scoreboard is recorded under docs/design/ (iron law)
  • No model/harness code changed in this PR — no additional test suite required
  • The continuous loop keeps running in this session; positive-result cycles (primary-metric win, ship-quality win, or executable unblock) will land as separate stacked PRs on top of this branch per autotrain-iteration-delivery.md

Generated by Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added records for 27 continuous autotrain campaigns, including checkpoint details and execution outcomes.
    • Documented screening results across 27 evaluation cycles with candidate/control metrics, measurement status, failure reasons, and retry details.
    • Clarified that all results are fixture-based evidence only and do not represent a production release or promotion.
    • Recorded unavailable measurements, insufficient samples, unchanged or degraded similarity, incomplete evaluations, latency concerns, and rejected promotion criteria.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
slm-training Ready Ready Preview Aug 8, 2026 3:13pm

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@Tyler-R-Kendrick, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 45 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: ab659f75-f267-461d-883c-d79cffb10ae7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 232eb88 and cc0318a.

📒 Files selected for processing (21)
  • README.md
  • docs/MODEL_CARD.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c1-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c2-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c28-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c28-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c29-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c29-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c30-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c30-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c31-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c31-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c32-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c32-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c5-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c7-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.md
  • src/slm_training/resources/versions.json
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change adds continuous OpenUI screening fixtures and reports for cycles c1 through c27. It records metrics, failure reasons, fixture-only evidence, non-ship outcomes, checkpoint paths, and version-history entries.

Changes

Continuous OpenUI screening records

Layer / File(s) Summary
Screening results for cycles c1 through c9
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c{1..9}-results.{json,md}
Added cycle results with candidate and control metrics, measurement status, failure reasons, schema metadata, and fixture-only or non-ship classifications.
Screening results for cycles c10 through c18
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c{10..18}-results.{json,md}
Added cycle results with comparative metrics, negative screening outcomes, fixture limitations, rejection reasons, and stack-layer status.
Screening results for cycles c19 through c27
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c{19..27}-results.{json,md}
Added cycle results with control and candidate metrics, promotion-blocking reasons, schema metadata, and explicit non-ship status.
Campaign documentation and history
README.md, docs/MODEL_CARD.md, src/slm_training/resources/versions.json
Added checkpoint paths, fixture or scratch status, non-promotion outcomes, execution status, retry signals, and unchanged SLM-228 behavior for campaigns c1 through c27.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the documentation-only continuous-loop closeout and its non-positive screening outcome.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch claude/great-dirac-w92s3f

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In
`@docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json`:
- Around line 2-3: Add structured provenance to every continuous-loop result
record in
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json
(lines 2-3),
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.json
(lines 2-3),
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c5-results.json
(lines 2-3), and
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-results.json
(lines 2-3). Include self-contained source_commit, recipe, seed, AgentV or
result-bundle reference, and per-arm status fields, or add a committed
manifest/document linking each record to all of those values.
- Around line 16-22: Materialize the configured primary_metric entries in
control_metrics for the incomplete c3 and c4 results by adding
smoke.structural_similarity with a null value. Update the corresponding Markdown
records as well:
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json
lines 16-22 and its Markdown file line 12, plus
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.json
lines 16-22 and its Markdown file line 12; preserve the existing unnamespaced
metrics.

In `@docs/MODEL_CARD.md`:
- Around line 1452-1480: Update the Checkpoint history table in MODEL_CARD.md by
adding rows for every c1, c2, c4, c6, and c7 checkpoint listed in the continuous
autotrain notes, placing the newest entries first. Preserve the existing
standalone notes as supplemental context and ensure each checkpoint path is
represented in the canonical dashboard-facing table.

In `@README.md`:
- Around line 802-824: Update the repeated continuous-cycle note headings to be
unique by including each cycle ID for c2, c4, c6, and c7; apply this change in
README.md lines 802-824 and docs/MODEL_CARD.md lines 1458-1480, preserving the
note content and correcting the duplicate Markdown anchors.
🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 7f43c454-b5a3-4e36-8475-a554d959b560

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b12eb2c and 82b425f.

📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • README.md
  • docs/MODEL_CARD.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c1-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c1-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c2-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c2-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c5-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c5-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c7-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c7-results.md
  • src/slm_training/resources/versions.json

Comment on lines +16 to +22
"control_metrics": {
"binder_reference_f1": null,
"latency_ms_p50": null,
"meaningful_program_rate": null,
"parse_rate": null,
"structural_similarity": null
},

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
rtk rg -n -C 4 '"primary_metric"|"control_metrics"|"smoke\.structural_similarity"' docs/design scripts src tests

Repository: Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training

Length of output: 208


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -e

printf 'RTK available? '
if command -v rtk >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  rtk --version || true
else
  printf 'no\n'
fi

printf '\nFiles with current names:\n'
git ls-files docs/design | grep 'continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c[3456]-results' | sort

printf '\nPrimary/control/samekey occurrences in docs/design:\n'
rg -n -C 3 '"primary_metric"|"control_metrics"|"smoke\.structural_similarity"`|`'\''smoke\.structural_similarity|structural_similarity' docs/design || true

printf '\nRelevant doc snippets:\n'
for f in docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json \
         docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.md \
         docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.json \
         docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.md \
         docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c5-results.json \
         docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-results.json \
         docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-results.md; do
  if [ -f "$f" ]; then
    printf '\n--- %s ---\n' "$f"
    sed -n '1,60p' "$f"
  fi
done

printf '\nProgrammatic JSON key set comparison:\n'
python3 - <<'PY'
import json, pathlib, re
files = [
    "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json",
    "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.json",
    "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c5-results.json",
    "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-results.json",
]
for path in files:
    data = json.loads(pathlib.Path(path).read_text())
    pm = data.get("primary_metric")
    cm = data.get("control_metrics") or {}
    print(path)
    print(" primary_metric:", pm)
    print(" control_keys:", sorted(cm.keys()))
    wanted = {"smoke.structural_similarity"}
    if pm and isinstance(pm, str):
        print(" primary_in_control:", pm in cm)
        print(" smoke_structural_similarity:", cm.get("smoke.structural_similarity"))
PY

Repository: Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training

Length of output: 50386


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -e

files=(
  "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json"
  "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.md"
  "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.json"
  "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.md"
  "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c5-results.json"
  "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c5-results.md"
  "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-results.json"
  "docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-results.md"
)

printf '%s\n' "${files[@]}"
printf '\n--- targeted occurrences ---\n'
rg -n -C 3 'primary_metric|control_metrics|smoke\.structural_similarity|structural_similarity' "${files[@]}" || true

printf '\n--- markdown first 25 lines ---\n'
for f in "${files[@]}"; do
  echo "--- $f ---"
  sed -n '1,25p' "$f"
done

printf '\n--- JSON key-analysis summary ---\n'
python3 - <<'PY'
import json, pathlib, re, sys
files = [
    pathlib.Path("docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json"),
    pathlib.Path("docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.json"),
    pathlib.Path("docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c5-results.json"),
    pathlib.Path("docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-results.json"),
]
smoke_re = re.compile(r'^smoke\.')
for path in files:
    data = json.loads(path.read_text())
    pm = data.get("primary_metric")
    cm = data.get("control_metrics") or {}
    smoke = sorted(k for k in cm if smoke_re.match(k))
    print(path.name)
    print("  primary_metric =", pm)
    print("  control_metrics_keys =", ", ".join(str(k) for k in cm.keys()) or "<none>")
    print("  smoke.control_metrics_keys =", ", ".join(smoke) or "<none>")
    print("  primary_key_exist:", pm in cm if pm else "N/A")
    print("  smoke.structural_similarity:", cm.get("smoke.structural_similarity"))
PY

Repository: Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training

Length of output: 39082


Keep the primary_metric key materialized in incomplete controls.

c3 and c4 set primary_metric to smoke.structural_similarity, but control_metrics only has the unnamespaced keys. Add the namespaced control entries with null values to the JSON files and mirror them in the Markdown files so control_metrics[primary_metric] has a stable, readable record shape.

📍 Affects 4 files
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json#L16-L22 (this comment)
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.md#L12-L12
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.json#L16-L22
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.md#L12-L12
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In
`@docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json`
around lines 16 - 22, Materialize the configured primary_metric entries in
control_metrics for the incomplete c3 and c4 results by adding
smoke.structural_similarity with a null value. Update the corresponding Markdown
records as well:
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c3-results.json
lines 16-22 and its Markdown file line 12, plus
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-results.json
lines 16-22 and its Markdown file line 12; preserve the existing unnamespaced
metrics.

Comment thread docs/MODEL_CARD.md
Comment on lines +1452 to +1480
## Continuous autotrain note (2026-08-08)

- campaign: `continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c1`
- checkpoints: `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c1-bounds/checkpoints/last.pt`, `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c1-control/checkpoints/last.pt`
- honesty: fixture/scratch continuous cycle — **not** a ship promotion.

## Continuous autotrain note (2026-08-08)

- campaign: `continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c2`
- checkpoints: `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c2-component-plan/checkpoints/last.pt`, `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c2-control/checkpoints/last.pt`
- honesty: fixture/scratch continuous cycle — **not** a ship promotion.

## Continuous autotrain note (2026-08-08)

- campaign: `continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4`
- checkpoints: `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-bounds/checkpoints/last.pt`, `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c4-control/checkpoints/last.pt`
- honesty: fixture/scratch continuous cycle — **not** a ship promotion.

## Continuous autotrain note (2026-08-08)

- campaign: `continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6`
- checkpoints: `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-component-plan/checkpoints/last.pt`, `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c6-control/checkpoints/last.pt`
- honesty: fixture/scratch continuous cycle — **not** a ship promotion.

## Continuous autotrain note (2026-08-08)

- campaign: `continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c7`
- checkpoints: `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c7-component-edge/checkpoints/last.pt`, `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c7-control/checkpoints/last.pt`
- honesty: fixture/scratch continuous cycle — **not** a ship promotion.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Add the new checkpoints to Checkpoint history.

The c1, c2, c4, c6, and c7 records are standalone notes after the checklist. They are not rows in the checkpoint-history table. The file states that the table is used by the dashboard and readers, so these checkpoints are omitted from the canonical index. Add one row per checkpoint at the top of the table, newest first. Keep the notes only as supplemental context.

As per coding guidelines, new or replaced checkpoints must be added at the top of the checkpoint-history table. Based on learnings, this table also covers local scratch screening checkpoints.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.23.2)

[warning] 1458-1458: Multiple headings with the same content

(MD024, no-duplicate-heading)


[warning] 1464-1464: Multiple headings with the same content

(MD024, no-duplicate-heading)


[warning] 1470-1470: Multiple headings with the same content

(MD024, no-duplicate-heading)


[warning] 1476-1476: Multiple headings with the same content

(MD024, no-duplicate-heading)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@docs/MODEL_CARD.md` around lines 1452 - 1480, Update the Checkpoint history
table in MODEL_CARD.md by adding rows for every c1, c2, c4, c6, and c7
checkpoint listed in the continuous autotrain notes, placing the newest entries
first. Preserve the existing standalone notes as supplemental context and ensure
each checkpoint path is represented in the canonical dashboard-facing table.

Sources: Coding guidelines, Learnings

Comment thread README.md

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In
`@docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.json`:
- Around line 37-43: Publish auditable parameter-efficiency evidence for both
cycle 18 and cycle 19: in
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.json
lines 37-43 and
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19-results.json
lines 37-43, add trainable-parameter counts, the size-matched arm, and
EG_params, removing the insufficient-evidence reason when capacity did not
increase; mirror the canonical parameter evidence in
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.md
line 11 and
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19-results.md
line 11.

In
`@docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.md`:
- Around line 12-13: Add the required version_stamp/v1 provenance field to the
durable JSON cycle result corresponding to the documented metrics, preserving
consistency with the Markdown cycle, disposition, metrics, and reasoning
content. Ensure the JSON payload includes the expected versioned provenance
value without altering unrelated result fields.

In
`@docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.json`:
- Around line 1-47: Add the required version_stamp and a non-empty components
payload to each continuous_cycle_results/v1 result:
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.json
lines 1-47,
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9-results.json
lines 1-46,
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26-results.json
lines 1-45, and
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.json
lines 1-45; preserve the existing cycle metrics and result fields.

In
`@docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.md`:
- Around line 12-13: Record capacity metadata beside the quality metrics in all
four reports:
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.md:12-13,
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9-results.md:12-13,
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26-results.md:12-13,
and
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.md:12-13.
Add candidate/control trainable parameter counts, size-match status, and the
corresponding EG_params charge-growth metadata in each report.

In `@README.md`:
- Around line 828-830: Complete the checkpoint provenance for every c8-c27 arm
in the summaries anchored by README.md lines 828-830 and docs/MODEL_CARD.md
lines 1484-1486: include the arm roster, evaluations, recipe, honesty mode, and
checkpoint locations, and explicitly state why local scratch checkpoints were
not synced. Apply the same complete fields and no-sync reason in both files.
🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 93e15b55-aad5-4f74-b853-25a08200495f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82b425f and 232eb88.

📒 Files selected for processing (43)
  • README.md
  • docs/MODEL_CARD.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c10-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c10-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c11-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c11-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c12-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c12-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c13-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c13-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c14-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c14-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c15-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c15-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c16-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c16-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c17-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c17-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c20-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c20-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c21-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c21-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c22-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c22-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c23-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c23-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c24-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c24-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c25-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c25-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.md
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9-results.json
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9-results.md
  • src/slm_training/resources/versions.json

Comment on lines +37 to +43
"reasons": [
"fixture_insufficient_n:c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-slot-component-fidelity-coupling",
"fixture_insufficient_n:c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-control",
"primary_metric_null_or_worse:smoke.structural_similarity:control=0.1975 candidate=0.057499999999999996 improvement=-0.14",
"fixture_insufficient_n_alone",
"eg_params_block:capacity growth blocked for climb/promotion: capacity_increased_without_parameter_efficiency_evidence"
],

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift

Publish parameter-efficiency evidence for the blocked capacity-growth decisions.

The cycle 18 and cycle 19 records state that capacity growth lacked parameter-efficiency evidence. Neither the JSON records nor the Markdown mirrors publish the values needed to audit that decision.

  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.json#L37-L43: Add trainable-parameter counts, the size-matched arm, and EG_params; remove the reason if capacity did not increase.
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.md#L11-L11: Mirror the canonical parameter evidence from the JSON record.
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19-results.json#L37-L43: Add trainable-parameter counts, the size-matched arm, and EG_params; remove the reason if capacity did not increase.
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19-results.md#L11-L11: Mirror the canonical parameter evidence from the JSON record.

As per coding guidelines, model growth must report trainable parameters beside quality metrics, size-match arms, and charge growth with EG_params.

📍 Affects 4 files
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.json#L37-L43 (this comment)
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.md#L11-L11
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19-results.json#L37-L43
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19-results.md#L11-L11
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In
`@docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.json`
around lines 37 - 43, Publish auditable parameter-efficiency evidence for both
cycle 18 and cycle 19: in
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.json
lines 37-43 and
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19-results.json
lines 37-43, add trainable-parameter counts, the size-matched arm, and
EG_params, removing the insufficient-evidence reason when capacity did not
increase; mirror the canonical parameter evidence in
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18-results.md
line 11 and
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19-results.md
line 11.

Source: Coding guidelines

Comment on lines +12 to +13
- control_metrics: `{'latency_ms_p50': 3775.95, 'parse_rate': 1.0, 'meaningful_program_rate': 0.0, 'structural_similarity': 0.057499999999999996, 'binder_reference_f1': 0.0, 'smoke.latency_ms_p50': 3775.95, 'smoke.parse_rate': 1.0, 'smoke.meaningful_program_rate': 0.0, 'smoke.structural_similarity': 0.057499999999999996, 'smoke.binder_reference_f1': 0.0}`
- candidate_metrics: `{'latency_ms_p50': 3745.4, 'parse_rate': 1.0, 'meaningful_program_rate': 0.0, 'structural_similarity': 0.057499999999999996, 'binder_reference_f1': 0.0, 'smoke.latency_ms_p50': 3745.4, 'smoke.parse_rate': 1.0, 'smoke.meaningful_program_rate': 0.0, 'smoke.structural_similarity': 0.057499999999999996, 'smoke.binder_reference_f1': 0.0}`

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

md='docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.md'
json="${md%.md}.json"

rtk jq -e '
  has("version_stamp")
  and .loop_id == "continuous-openui-20260808"
  and .cycle_index == 27
  and .primary_metric == "smoke.structural_similarity"
  and .positive == false
  and .stack_layer == false
  and .measurement_complete == true
' "$json"

rtk rg -n \
  'version_stamp|fixture_insufficient_n_alone|primary_metric_null_or_worse|candidate_metrics|control_metrics' \
  "$md" "$json"

rtk rg -n \
  'harness\.experiments\.slm228_spectral_disposition|no-bump:' \
  src/slm_training/resources/versions.json

Repository: Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training

Length of output: 208


🏁 Script executed:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

md='docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.md'
json="${md%.md}.json"

printf 'RTK availability: '
if command -v rtk >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  rtk --version || true
else
  printf 'not available\n'
fi

printf '\nFiles exist:\n'
for f in "$md" "$json" src/slm_training/resources/versions.json; do
  if [ -e "$f" ]; then
    printf '%s exists (%s bytes)\n' "$f" "$(wc -c < "$f")"
  else
    printf '%s missing\n' "$f"
  fi
done

[ -f "$md" ] && printf '\nMarkdown version/provenance/reason sections:\n' && sed -n '1,220p' "$md"

printf '\nJSON existence and top-level keys (if present):\n'
if [ -f "$json" ]; then
  python3 - <<'PY' "$json"
import json, sys
from pathlib import Path
p = Path(sys.argv[1])
text = p.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
try:
    data = json.loads(text)
except Exception as e:
    print(f"JSON_ERROR: {type(e).__name__}: {e}")
    raise SystemExit(2)

top = list(data.keys())[:80]
print("has_version_stamp:", "version_stamp" in data)
print("top_level_keys:", ", ".join(top if len(top) <= 50 else top[:50] + ["..."]))
print("version_stamp_type:", type(data.get("version_stamp")).__name__)
print("version_stamp:", json.dumps(data.get("version_stamp"), indent=2)[:800] if "version_stamp" in data else None)
for k in ("loop_id","cycle_index","primary_metric","positive","stack_layer","measurement_complete", "candidate_metrics","control_metrics","reasons"):
    print(f"{k}: {data.get(k)!r}")
PY
fi

printf '\nSearch relevant tokens:\n'
if command -v rg >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  rg -n 'version_stamp|fixture_insufficient_n_alone|primary_metric_null_or_worse|candidate_metrics|control_metrics|loop_id|cycle_index|semantic_run|no-bump:' "$md" "$json" src/slm_training/resources/versions.json || true
fi

Repository: Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training

Length of output: 50386


Add version_stamp/v1 provenance to the cycle result payload.

docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.json is present and matches the Markdown cycle/disposition/metrics/reason content, but it omits version_stamp. Add the stamp to the durable JSON result, because evaluation payloads require version_stamp/v1 for versioned provenance.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In
`@docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.md`
around lines 12 - 13, Add the required version_stamp/v1 provenance field to the
durable JSON cycle result corresponding to the documented metrics, preserving
consistency with the Markdown cycle, disposition, metrics, and reasoning
content. Ensure the JSON payload includes the expected versioned provenance
value without altering unrelated result fields.

Source: Coding guidelines

Comment on lines +1 to +47
{
"auto": true,
"campaign_id": "continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8",
"candidate_metrics": {
"binder_reference_f1": 0.6333333333333333,
"latency_ms_p50": 3925.65,
"meaningful_program_rate": 0.3333333333333333,
"parse_rate": 1.0,
"smoke.binder_reference_f1": 0.6333333333333333,
"smoke.latency_ms_p50": 3925.65,
"smoke.meaningful_program_rate": 0.3333333333333333,
"smoke.parse_rate": 1.0,
"smoke.structural_similarity": 0.17416666666666666,
"structural_similarity": 0.17416666666666666
},
"control_metrics": {
"binder_reference_f1": 0.6333333333333333,
"latency_ms_p50": 4199.66,
"meaningful_program_rate": 0.3333333333333333,
"parse_rate": 1.0,
"smoke.binder_reference_f1": 0.6333333333333333,
"smoke.latency_ms_p50": 4199.66,
"smoke.meaningful_program_rate": 0.3333333333333333,
"smoke.parse_rate": 1.0,
"smoke.structural_similarity": 0.17416666666666666,
"structural_similarity": 0.17416666666666666
},
"cycle_index": 8,
"cycle_intent": "screening",
"cycle_role": "screening",
"evidence_class": "fixture",
"honesty": "fixture_screening_only_not_ship",
"loop_id": "continuous-openui-20260808",
"measurement_complete": true,
"positive": false,
"primary_metric": "smoke.structural_similarity",
"reasons": [
"fixture_insufficient_n:c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-component-plan",
"fixture_insufficient_n:c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-control",
"efficiency_win:mpr_per_ms:7.9371505e-05->8.4911628e-05:gain_fraction=0.069799906:minimum=0.05",
"quality_held:parse=1.0 mpr=0.3333333333333333",
"primary_metric_null_or_worse:smoke.structural_similarity:control=0.17416666666666666 candidate=0.17416666666666666 improvement=0.0",
"fixture_insufficient_n_alone"
],
"schema": "continuous_cycle_results/v1",
"stack_layer": false
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
rtk python -m scripts.verify_version_stamps --check

Repository: Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training

Length of output: 208


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "== files =="
git ls-files | rg 'continuous-cycle|continuous-loop|cycle_results|version_stamp|decode-invariants|versions\.json' || true

echo
echo "== candidate JSON top-level keys =="
for f in \
  docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.json \
  docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9-results.json \
  docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26-results.json \
  docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.json
do
  echo "-- $f"
  python3 - <<'PY' "$f"
import json, sys
p=sys.argv[1]
data=json.load(open(p))
print("top-level:", sorted(data.keys()))
print("version_stamp:", data.get("version_stamp"))
PY
done

echo
echo "== version_stamp occurrences =="
rg -n '"version_stamp"|stamp_schema|version_stamp/v1' docs src scripts resources || true

echo
echo "== scripts containing version stamp validation =="
fd -a 'verify.*version|version.*stamp|cycle' scripts src docs 2>/dev/null | head -100 || true

Repository: Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training

Length of output: 50386


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "== target JSON top-level keys, version stamps, schemas =="
python3 - <<'PY'
import json, glob
pat='docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c*-results.json'
for p in sorted(glob.glob(pat)):
    data=json.load(open(p))
    print(p)
    print("  schema:", data.get("schema"))
    print("  version_stamp:", data.get("version_stamp"))
    print("  top_level_count:", len(data))
PY

echo
echo "== tracked files matching version/cycle names =="
git ls-files | rg '(^scripts/verify_version_stamps|continuous-cycle|continuous-loop|cycle_results|version_stamp|continuous.*results)' | sed -n '1,200p'

echo
echo "== focused source search =="
rg -n --glob '!**/{outputs,assets,*.json}' --glob '!README.md' --glob '!docs/design/**' \
  '"version_stamp|stamp_schema|version_stamp/v1|continuous_cycle_results' scripts src docs/design . 2>/dev/null | sed -n '1,240p' || true

Repository: Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training

Length of output: 42788


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "== scripts/run_autotrain_continuous continuous cycle result construction =="
rg -n -C 10 'continuous_cycle_results|version_stamp|version_stamp_components|stamp_schema' scripts/run_autotrain_continuous.py | sed -n '2310,2360p;10310,10410p;10388,10405p' || true

echo
echo "== scripts/verify_version_stamps relevant handlers =="
rg -n -C 12 'continuous_cycle_results|version_stamp|STAMP_SCHEMA|artifact_requirements|paths' scripts/verify_version_stamps.py | sed -n '1,90p;260,310p;450,500p' || true

echo
echo "== build_version_stamp signature and components =="
python3 - <<'PY'
import ast, pathlib
p = pathlib.Path("scripts/run_autotrain_continuous.py")
source = p.read_text()
tree = ast.parse(source)
for node in ast.walk(tree):
    if isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef) and node.name == "build_version_stamp":
        print("found build_version_stamp")
        print("args:", [a.arg for a in node.args.args if a.arg not in ("self",)])
        print("returns:", (node.returns.id if isinstance(node.returns, ast.Name) else str(node.returns)))
        print("body_first_50:", ast.get_source_segment(source, node).splitlines()[:80])
PY

Repository: Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training

Length of output: 4765


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "== docs/design/version-stamp-contract =="
sed -n '1,260p' docs/design/version-stamp-contract.md 2>/dev/null || true

echo
echo "== AGENTS result version stamp rule =="
sed -n '450,540p' AGENTS.md 2>/dev/null || true

echo
echo "== autotrain search focused =="
rg -n -C 8 '"schema": "continuous_cycle_results/v1"|continuous_cycle_results/v1|version_stamp|stamp_schema|cycle_index|campaign_id' scripts/run_autotrain_continuous.py | sed -n '1,220p;2320,2355p;10310,10405p' || true

echo
echo "== verify_version_stamps schema/result handlers =="
rg -n -C 9 'RESULT_SHAPE_KEYS|is_new_file|MUST|version_stamp|continuous|docs/design|result record' scripts/verify_version_stamps.py | sed -n '1,120p;200,290p;380,500p' || true

echo
echo "== versions file continuous or relevant components =="
python3 - <<'PY'
import json
from pathlib import Path
versions=json.loads(Path("src/slm_training/resources/versions.json").read_text())
components=versions.get("components", {})
for cid, entry in sorted(components.items()):
    text=" ".join(map(str, (cid, entry.get("version"), entry.get("kind"), entry.get("paths"))))
    if "continuous" in text or text.startswith("continuous") or "cycle" in text:
        print(cid, json.dumps(entry, indent=2, sort_keys=True, indent=None, ensure_ascii=False)[:2000].splitlines())
PY

Repository: Tyler-R-Kendrick/slm-training

Length of output: 28027


Stamp the new cycle result payloads.

Add version_stamp to each continuous_cycle_results/v1 JSON result and include non-empty components; the changed result JSON files at c8, c9, c26, and c27 currently omit the required payload stamp.

📍 Affects 4 files
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.json#L1-L47 (this comment)
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9-results.json#L1-L46
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26-results.json#L1-L45
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.json#L1-L45
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In
`@docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.json`
around lines 1 - 47, Add the required version_stamp and a non-empty components
payload to each continuous_cycle_results/v1 result:
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.json
lines 1-47,
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9-results.json
lines 1-46,
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26-results.json
lines 1-45, and
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.json
lines 1-45; preserve the existing cycle metrics and result fields.

Sources: Coding guidelines, Learnings

Comment on lines +12 to +13
- control_metrics: `{'latency_ms_p50': 4199.66, 'parse_rate': 1.0, 'meaningful_program_rate': 0.3333333333333333, 'structural_similarity': 0.17416666666666666, 'binder_reference_f1': 0.6333333333333333, 'smoke.latency_ms_p50': 4199.66, 'smoke.parse_rate': 1.0, 'smoke.meaningful_program_rate': 0.3333333333333333, 'smoke.structural_similarity': 0.17416666666666666, 'smoke.binder_reference_f1': 0.6333333333333333}`
- candidate_metrics: `{'latency_ms_p50': 3925.65, 'parse_rate': 1.0, 'meaningful_program_rate': 0.3333333333333333, 'structural_similarity': 0.17416666666666666, 'binder_reference_f1': 0.6333333333333333, 'smoke.latency_ms_p50': 3925.65, 'smoke.parse_rate': 1.0, 'smoke.meaningful_program_rate': 0.3333333333333333, 'smoke.structural_similarity': 0.17416666666666666, 'smoke.binder_reference_f1': 0.6333333333333333}`

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift

Record capacity metadata beside every result.

The four new reports provide quality and latency metrics without trainable parameter counts, size-match status, or EG_params.

  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.md#L12-L13: add candidate/control parameter counts and capacity status.
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9-results.md#L12-L13: add the same capacity metadata.
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26-results.md#L12-L13: add the same capacity metadata.
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.md#L12-L13: add the same capacity metadata.

As per coding guidelines, report trainable parameters beside quality metrics, size-match arms, and charge growth with EG_params.

📍 Affects 4 files
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.md#L12-L13 (this comment)
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9-results.md#L12-L13
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26-results.md#L12-L13
  • docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.md#L12-L13
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In
`@docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.md`
around lines 12 - 13, Record capacity metadata beside the quality metrics in all
four reports:
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-results.md:12-13,
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9-results.md:12-13,
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26-results.md:12-13,
and
docs/design/continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27-results.md:12-13.
Add candidate/control trainable parameter counts, size-match status, and the
corresponding EG_params charge-growth metadata in each report.

Source: Coding guidelines

Comment thread README.md
Comment on lines +828 to +830
- campaign: `continuous-loop-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8`
- checkpoints: `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-component-plan/checkpoints/last.pt`, `runs/c20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c8-control/checkpoints/last.pt`
- honesty: fixture/scratch continuous cycle — **not** a ship promotion.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift

Complete checkpoint provenance in both model-card summaries.

The new notes include paths and a non-ship statement, but omit the arm roster, evaluations, recipe, and an explicit no-sync reason.

  • README.md#L828-L830: add the required provenance fields for every c8-c27 arm.
  • docs/MODEL_CARD.md#L1484-L1486: add the same fields and state why local scratch checkpoints were not synced.

As per coding guidelines, checkpoint documentation must include roster, evaluations, recipe, honesty mode, and checkpoint location, and local scratch checkpoints need an explicit no-sync reason. Based on learnings, local scratch screening checkpoints must be recorded in both README.md and docs/MODEL_CARD.md.

📍 Affects 2 files
  • README.md#L828-L830 (this comment)
  • docs/MODEL_CARD.md#L1484-L1486
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@README.md` around lines 828 - 830, Complete the checkpoint provenance for
every c8-c27 arm in the summaries anchored by README.md lines 828-830 and
docs/MODEL_CARD.md lines 1484-1486: include the arm roster, evaluations, recipe,
honesty mode, and checkpoint locations, and explicitly state why local scratch
checkpoints were not synced. Apply the same complete fields and no-sync reason
in both files.

Sources: Coding guidelines, Learnings

claude and others added 25 commits August 8, 2026 10:12
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c9 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c10 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c11 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c12 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c13 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c14 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c15 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c16 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c17 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c18 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c19 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c20 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c21 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c22 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c23 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c24 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c25 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c26 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c27 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c28 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c29 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c30 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c31 closeout + version stamp no-bump (auto-healed)
…p-20260808-continuous-openui-202608-1211eecb-c32 closeout
@Tyler-R-Kendrick
Tyler-R-Kendrick force-pushed the claude/great-dirac-w92s3f branch from ac7aad5 to cc0318a Compare August 8, 2026 15:12
@Tyler-R-Kendrick
Tyler-R-Kendrick merged commit d8f5eac into main Aug 8, 2026
1 of 3 checks passed
@Tyler-R-Kendrick
Tyler-R-Kendrick deleted the claude/great-dirac-w92s3f branch August 8, 2026 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants