Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempting to get breaking test correctly failing on CI #510

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

allouis
Copy link
Collaborator

@allouis allouis commented Apr 10, 2025

🍦

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies how records are set in the KnexKvStore class and updates the test database configuration. In the KnexKvStore class, the set method now uses a transaction that first checks for the existence of a record with the given key. It then performs an insert if the key is not found, or an update if the key exists, replacing the previous use of an insert with an onConflict clause. Additionally, the test setup in src/test/db.ts is updated to include a connection pool configuration with both min and max properties set to 1, ensuring a fixed pool size for the duration of database testing.

Possibly related PRs

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/test/db.ts (1)

49-52: Consider the implications of a single connection pool for parallel testing.
While using a single connection simplifies the test environment, you may encounter slower performance or queued transactions if multiple test suites attempt to connect concurrently. If these tests do not require parallel execution, this is perfectly acceptable. Otherwise, you might consider slightly increasing the pool size to accommodate concurrent usage without resource contention.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 875bd0f and 0694fbc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/knex.kvstore.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/test/db.ts (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build, Test and Push
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/knex.kvstore.ts (1)

44-58: Double-check concurrency handling in transactions for the set method.
Your transaction-based approach is a good start to ensure consistency when updating or inserting records. However, if multiple transactions target the same key concurrently, you might still observe race conditions. Consider using database-specific upsert capabilities (e.g. INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE in MySQL) or a “FOR UPDATE” lock on the row to ensure no conflicting transactions can read an outdated record before it’s updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant