-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Attempting to get breaking test correctly failing on CI #510
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This reverts commit 875bd0f.
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies how records are set in the Possibly related PRs
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
3fe746f
to
96cb51f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/test/db.ts (1)
49-52
: Consider the implications of a single connection pool for parallel testing.
While using a single connection simplifies the test environment, you may encounter slower performance or queued transactions if multiple test suites attempt to connect concurrently. If these tests do not require parallel execution, this is perfectly acceptable. Otherwise, you might consider slightly increasing the pool size to accommodate concurrent usage without resource contention.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/knex.kvstore.ts
(1 hunks)src/test/db.ts
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Build, Test and Push
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/knex.kvstore.ts (1)
44-58
: Double-check concurrency handling in transactions for theset
method.
Your transaction-based approach is a good start to ensure consistency when updating or inserting records. However, if multiple transactions target the same key concurrently, you might still observe race conditions. Consider using database-specific upsert capabilities (e.g.INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
in MySQL) or a “FOR UPDATE” lock on the row to ensure no conflicting transactions can read an outdated record before it’s updated.
🍦