Fix ty invalid assignment - #15221
Conversation
Closing this pull request as invalid@kadubhumika, this pull request is being closed as none of the checkboxes have been marked. It is important that you go through the checklist and mark the ones relevant to this pull request. Please read the Contributing guidelines. If you're facing any problem on how to mark a checkbox, please read the following instructions:
NOTE: Only |
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
|
@priya-sundaram-dev Your review, please. |
|
Reviewed post-merge — this is exactly the minimal-surface-area approach #15204 was asking for. 👍
Thanks @kadubhumika for knocking out all 23 spots in one pass. Nicely scoped. |
|
Thanks for the merge and the great feedback @cclauss and @priya-sundaram-dev ! I really enjoyed working on this and would love to keep contributing. If there are any other type-checking issues, open bugs, or features you need help with, please let me know, I’d be happy to jump on them! |
Description
Fixes the remaining
tyinvalid-assignment and related type-checking diagnostics across multiple files.Fixes: #15204
Changes made
Nodehandling in linked list implementations.urllib.requestimport.Validation
Result: