Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix an abstract model violation msg #2559

Merged
merged 133 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

sydb
Copy link
Member

@sydb sydb commented May 19, 2024

This is intended to address #2497. As a side effect, it simplifies the Schematron, too.

  • Updated Schematron as per issue
  • Added a test to detest.xml
  • Updated expected results to match new test file

 * Updated Schematron as per issue
 * Added a test to detest.xml
 * Updated expected results to match new test file
Copy link
Contributor

@torstenroeder torstenroeder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look right to me. What about the checks? Do they need to pass before approval?

torstenroeder and others added 26 commits January 14, 2025 12:54
Updated specs for `<line>` and `<lb>`
"context-required" deprecation warning for 1 month so
we do not get errors until after release next week.
update tests to match.
Replaced 'break' with 'beginning' for page|line|column|gathering in Guidelines and Specs
…urrent_document

Implement @hcayless solution #1 for issue @2246 — do not test `@spanTo` across files
Address #2497:
 * Updated Schematron as per issue
 * Added a test to detest.xml
 * Updated expected results to match new test file
Copy link
Member

@ebeshero ebeshero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've now tested this thoroughly, including building the tei_all and testing it on an epigraph. All good.

@ebeshero ebeshero merged commit 052a340 into dev Jan 21, 2025
2 checks passed
@ebeshero ebeshero deleted the sydb_2497_p_in_epigraph_in_lg_is_OK branch January 21, 2025 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Pending pending action described in a comment, to return to discussion before further action will be taken TEI: Guidelines & Documentation Type: Bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.