Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Ooops; forgot content of change log entry
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@sydb
sydb committed Mar 14, 2024
1 parent 03c774a commit 220f3ad
Showing 1 changed file with 172 additions and 167 deletions.
339 changes: 172 additions & 167 deletions P5/Test/detest.odd
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
<titleStmt>
<title>Testing errors</title>
<author>Lou Burnard</author>
<author>Sebastian Rhatz</author>
<author xml:id="sbauman.emt">Syd Bauman</author>
<author>Sebastian Rhatz</author>
<author xml:id="sbauman.emt">Syd Bauman</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<p>Published along with TEI P5 as part of its build process test suite</p>
Expand All @@ -20,7 +20,12 @@
</fileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2024-03-13" who="#sbauman.emt">

Add specifications for several new elements
(<gi>no_duplicate_attrs_1_invalid</gi>,
<gi>no_duplicate_attrs_2_valid</gi>,
<gi>no_duplicate_attrs_3_invalid</gi>, and
<gi>no_duplicate_attrs_4_invalid</gi>) that exercise the new
<name>no_duplicate_attrs</name> constraint.
</change>
<change when="2023-08-06" who="#sbauman.emt">
Add the <name>add_missing_scheme</name> and
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -165,17 +170,17 @@
<constraintSpec mode="add" ident="canondiv" scheme="schematron">
<constraint>
<sch:report test="@type='canon' and parent::tei:div/@type='canon'">
divs of type 'canon' may not be nested
</sch:report>
divs of type 'canon' may not be nested
</sch:report>
<sch:report test="@type='canon' and parent::tei:div/@type='register'">
divs of type 'canon' may not be nested within 'register'
</sch:report>
divs of type 'canon' may not be nested within 'register'
</sch:report>
<sch:report test="@type='canon' and count( tei:div[ @type eq 'canonText'] ) gt 1">
divs of type 'canon' may contain only one 'canonText'
</sch:report>
divs of type 'canon' may contain only one 'canonText'
</sch:report>
<sch:report test="@type='canonText' and not( parent::tei:div[ @type eq 'canon'])">
divs of type 'canonText' can only occur inside 'canon'
</sch:report>
divs of type 'canonText' can only occur inside 'canon'
</sch:report>
</constraint>
</constraintSpec>
</elementSpec>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -361,9 +366,9 @@
</elementSpec>
<elementSpec ident="blort2" mode="add">
<desc xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
Another completely spurious element made up for testing purposes only.
For information on what is being tested, see <gi>remarks</gi>.
</desc>
Another completely spurious element made up for testing purposes only.
For information on what is being tested, see <gi>remarks</gi>.
</desc>
<classes>
<memberOf key="model.pPart.data"/>
</classes>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -523,166 +528,166 @@
</listRef>
</elementSpec>

<elementSpec ident="no_duplicate_attrs_1_invalid" mode="add">
<elementSpec ident="no_duplicate_attrs_1_invalid" mode="add">
<desc xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
Another completely spurious element made up for testing purposes only.
For information on what is being tested, see <gi>remarks</gi>.
</desc>
<classes>
<memberOf key="att.global"/>
</classes>
<content><empty/></content>
<attList>
<attDef ident="bad"/>
<attDef ident="good"/>
<attDef ident="better"/>
<attDef ident="best"/>
<attDef ident="bad"/>
</attList>
<remarks xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
<p>Here we are testing the Schematron that tests for duplicate
atttribute defintions, i.e. <name>no_duplicate_attrs</name>.</p>
<p>This <gi>attList</gi> should be invalid because there
are two <att>bad</att> attributes defined as siblings.</p>
<p>Note that because this element is not a member of any
model class nor in any other element’s content model, it
will probably not show up in an output schema, which is
a good thing, becase defining an attribute twice like
that is an error in at least RELAX NG and DTD.</p>
</remarks>
</elementSpec>
Another completely spurious element made up for testing purposes only.
For information on what is being tested, see <gi>remarks</gi>.
</desc>
<classes>
<memberOf key="att.global"/>
</classes>
<content><empty/></content>
<attList>
<attDef ident="bad"/>
<attDef ident="good"/>
<attDef ident="better"/>
<attDef ident="best"/>
<attDef ident="bad"/>
</attList>
<remarks xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
<p>Here we are testing the Schematron that tests for duplicate
atttribute defintions, i.e. <name>no_duplicate_attrs</name>.</p>
<p>This <gi>attList</gi> should be invalid because there
are two <att>bad</att> attributes defined as siblings.</p>
<p>Note that because this element is not a member of any
model class nor in any other element’s content model, it
will probably not show up in an output schema, which is
a good thing, becase defining an attribute twice like
that is an error in at least RELAX NG and DTD.</p>
</remarks>
</elementSpec>

<elementSpec ident="no_duplicate_attrs_2_valid" mode="add">
<elementSpec ident="no_duplicate_attrs_2_valid" mode="add">
<desc xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
Another completely spurious element made up for testing purposes only.
For information on what is being tested, see <gi>remarks</gi>.
</desc>
<classes>
<memberOf key="att.global"/>
</classes>
<content><empty/></content>
<attList>
<attDef ident="have"/>
<attList org="choice">
<attDef ident="fun"/>
<attDef ident="fun"/>
<attDef ident="fun"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="til"/>
<attDef ident="her"/>
<attDef ident="daddy"/>
</attList>
<remarks xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
<p>Here we are testing the Schematron that tests for duplicate
atttribute defintions, i.e. <name>no_duplicate_attrs</name>.</p>
<p>This <gi>attList</gi> should be valid because,
although there are three <att>fun</att> attributes
defined as siblings, they are in alternation with one
another.</p>
<p>Note that because this element is not a member of any
model class nor in any other element’s content model, it
will probably not show up in an output schema.</p>
</remarks>
</elementSpec>
Another completely spurious element made up for testing purposes only.
For information on what is being tested, see <gi>remarks</gi>.
</desc>
<classes>
<memberOf key="att.global"/>
</classes>
<content><empty/></content>
<attList>
<attDef ident="have"/>
<attList org="choice">
<attDef ident="fun"/>
<attDef ident="fun"/>
<attDef ident="fun"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="til"/>
<attDef ident="her"/>
<attDef ident="daddy"/>
</attList>
<remarks xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
<p>Here we are testing the Schematron that tests for duplicate
atttribute defintions, i.e. <name>no_duplicate_attrs</name>.</p>
<p>This <gi>attList</gi> should be valid because,
although there are three <att>fun</att> attributes
defined as siblings, they are in alternation with one
another.</p>
<p>Note that because this element is not a member of any
model class nor in any other element’s content model, it
will probably not show up in an output schema.</p>
</remarks>
</elementSpec>

<elementSpec ident="no_duplicate_attrs_3_invalid" mode="add">
<elementSpec ident="no_duplicate_attrs_3_invalid" mode="add">
<desc xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
Another completely spurious element made up for testing purposes only.
For information on what is being tested, see <gi>remarks</gi>.
</desc>
<classes>
<memberOf key="att.global"/>
</classes>
<content><empty/></content>
<attList>
<attList org="choice">
<attDef ident="Your"/>
<attDef ident="My"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="spirit"/>
<attDef ident="and"/>
<attList org="choice">
<attDef ident="my"/>
<attDef ident="your"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="voice"/>
<attDef ident="in"/>
<attDef ident="one"/>
<attDef ident="combined"/>
<attDef ident="The"/>
<attDef ident="Phantom"/>
<attDef ident="of"/>
<attDef ident="the"/>
<attDef ident="Opera"/>
<attDef ident="is"/>
<attDef ident="there"/>
<attDef ident="Inside"/>
<attList org="choice">
<attDef ident="my"/>
<attDef ident="your"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="mind"/>
</attList>
<remarks xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
<p>Here we are testing the Schematron that tests for duplicate
atttribute defintions, i.e. <name>no_duplicate_attrs</name>.</p>
<p>This <gi>attList</gi> should be invalid because there
are both two <att>my</att> and two <att>your</att>
attributes defined, and although each is in an alternate
group, the two <att>my</att> attributes are not in
alternation with one another (nor are the two
<att>your</att>s).</p>
<p>Note that the <att>Your</att> vs <att>your</att> and
<att>The</att> vs <att>the</att> are not problems at all
— XML is completely case sensitive, those are different
attributes.</p>
<p>Note that because this element is not a member of any
model class nor in any other element’s content model, it
will probably not show up in an output schema, which is
a good thing, becase defining an attribute twice like
that is an error in at least RELAX NG and DTD.</p>
</remarks>
</elementSpec>
Another completely spurious element made up for testing purposes only.
For information on what is being tested, see <gi>remarks</gi>.
</desc>
<classes>
<memberOf key="att.global"/>
</classes>
<content><empty/></content>
<attList>
<attList org="choice">
<attDef ident="Your"/>
<attDef ident="My"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="spirit"/>
<attDef ident="and"/>
<attList org="choice">
<attDef ident="my"/>
<attDef ident="your"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="voice"/>
<attDef ident="in"/>
<attDef ident="one"/>
<attDef ident="combined"/>
<attDef ident="The"/>
<attDef ident="Phantom"/>
<attDef ident="of"/>
<attDef ident="the"/>
<attDef ident="Opera"/>
<attDef ident="is"/>
<attDef ident="there"/>
<attDef ident="Inside"/>
<attList org="choice">
<attDef ident="my"/>
<attDef ident="your"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="mind"/>
</attList>
<remarks xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
<p>Here we are testing the Schematron that tests for duplicate
atttribute defintions, i.e. <name>no_duplicate_attrs</name>.</p>
<p>This <gi>attList</gi> should be invalid because there
are both two <att>my</att> and two <att>your</att>
attributes defined, and although each is in an alternate
group, the two <att>my</att> attributes are not in
alternation with one another (nor are the two
<att>your</att>s).</p>
<p>Note that the <att>Your</att> vs <att>your</att> and
<att>The</att> vs <att>the</att> are not problems at all
— XML is completely case sensitive, those are different
attributes.</p>
<p>Note that because this element is not a member of any
model class nor in any other element’s content model, it
will probably not show up in an output schema, which is
a good thing, becase defining an attribute twice like
that is an error in at least RELAX NG and DTD.</p>
</remarks>
</elementSpec>

<elementSpec ident="no_duplicate_attrs_4_invalid" mode="add">
<elementSpec ident="no_duplicate_attrs_4_invalid" mode="add">
<desc xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
Another completely spurious element made up for testing purposes only.
For information on what is being tested, see <gi>remarks</gi>.
</desc>
<classes>
<memberOf key="att.global"/>
</classes>
<content><empty/></content>
<attList>
<attDef ident="all"/>
<attDef ident="the"/>
<attDef ident="leaves"/>
<attDef ident="are"/>
<attDef ident="brown"/>
<attList>
<attDef ident="and"/>
<attList>
<attDef ident="the"/>
<attDef ident="sky"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="is"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="gray"/>
</attList>
<remarks xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
<p>Here we are testing the Schematron that tests for duplicate
atttribute defintions, i.e. <name>no_duplicate_attrs</name>.</p>
<p>This <gi>attList</gi> should be invalid due to the
two definitions of the <att>the</att> attribute, which
are not in alternation.</p>
<p>Note that because this element is not a member of any
model class nor in any other element’s content model, it
will probably not show up in an output schema, which is
a good thing, becase defining an attribute twice like
that is an error in at least RELAX NG and DTD.</p>
</remarks>
</elementSpec>
Another completely spurious element made up for testing purposes only.
For information on what is being tested, see <gi>remarks</gi>.
</desc>
<classes>
<memberOf key="att.global"/>
</classes>
<content><empty/></content>
<attList>
<attDef ident="all"/>
<attDef ident="the"/>
<attDef ident="leaves"/>
<attDef ident="are"/>
<attDef ident="brown"/>
<attList>
<attDef ident="and"/>
<attList>
<attDef ident="the"/>
<attDef ident="sky"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="is"/>
</attList>
<attDef ident="gray"/>
</attList>
<remarks xml:lang="en" versionDate="2024-03-13">
<p>Here we are testing the Schematron that tests for duplicate
atttribute defintions, i.e. <name>no_duplicate_attrs</name>.</p>
<p>This <gi>attList</gi> should be invalid due to the
two definitions of the <att>the</att> attribute, which
are not in alternation.</p>
<p>Note that because this element is not a member of any
model class nor in any other element’s content model, it
will probably not show up in an output schema, which is
a good thing, becase defining an attribute twice like
that is an error in at least RELAX NG and DTD.</p>
</remarks>
</elementSpec>
</schemaSpec>
</div>
</body>
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 220f3ad

Please sign in to comment.