Skip to content

Conversation

n0kovo
Copy link

@n0kovo n0kovo commented Feb 14, 2024

As I was examining the README.md, particularly the section about LoRA training, I stumbled upon a segment that, while informative, seems to have overlooked a critical detail that I believe warrants correction.

Current Text:

For example, training a LoRA on my dog with the following kind of training images [...]
Lets me generate the following images of my dog given the prompt

An integral component of this example seems to have been inadvertently omitted, leading to a potential miscommunication of the narrative and the role of the involved parties.

Suggested Revision:

For example, training a LoRA on my dog Fernando (a very good boy) with the following kind of training images [...]
Lets me generate the following images of Fernando given the prompt

Why This Correction is Imperative:

  • Upholding Character Integrity: Ignoring Fernando's right to be recognized as a very good boy not only detracts from the quality of the documentation, but also does a disservice to Fernando himself. His character plays a pivotal role in the narrative, and omitting such a fundamental aspect undermines the integrity of his portrayal.

  • Enhancing Reader Engagement: Acknowledging Fernando's status as a very good boy adds an element of personality to the documentation. It transforms a standard technical example into a more engaging and memorable narrative, fostering a stronger connection with the audience. This inclusion makes the technical content more relatable and enjoyable, enhancing the overall reader experience.

Warmest regards,
n0kovo

Copy link

@jdicke jdicke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lol

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants