default claude and prettier repo level config

[kernelsam]

Issue number: senzing-garage/template-python#340 senzing-factory/build-resources#245

---

Resolves senzing-garage/template-python#340
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#245

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

---

Code Review Results

Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

• Status: Pass (with note that web fetch was blocked, but based on general standards)
• Analysis: The changes are configuration files (JSON and Markdown) which are properly formatted. JSON files use consistent indentation (2 spaces).

✅ No commented-out code

• Status: Pass
• Analysis: No commented-out code found in any of the changed files.

✅ Meaningful variable names

• Status: Pass
• Analysis: .claude/settings.local.json:2 - includeCoAuthoredBy is clear and self-documenting.

✅ DRY principle followed

• Status: Pass
• Analysis: Configuration files are minimal and do not repeat logic.

✅ Identify Defects

• Status: Pass
• Analysis: No bugs, logic errors, edge cases, security vulnerabilities, or race conditions detected. These are static configuration files.

❌ Project memory claude configuration (.claude/CLAUDE.md)

• Status: Fail - Not applicable but flagged
• Analysis: No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in the repository. While the checklist mentions considering it, there is none to review against.

---

Testing

❌ Unit tests for new functions

• Status: N/A
• Analysis: No code functions added - only configuration files. Testing requirements do not apply to these changes.

❌ Integration tests for new endpoints

• Status: N/A
• Analysis: No endpoints added.

❌ Edge cases covered

• Status: N/A
• Analysis: No testable code logic added.

❌ Test coverage > 80%

• Status: N/A
• Analysis: Configuration files do not require test coverage.

---

Documentation

⚠️ README updated if needed

• Status: Warning - Needs verification
• Analysis: The new .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md adds a new slash command capability. Consider documenting this in the main README.md if users need to know about this custom command.

✅ API docs updated

• Status: N/A
• Analysis: No API changes.

✅ Inline comments for complex logic

• Status: Pass
• Analysis: Configuration files are self-documenting and don't require inline comments.

❌ CHANGELOG.md updated

• Status: Fail
• Analysis: CHANGELOG.md was not updated. Changes include:
  • New Claude code review command (.claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md)
  • New Claude local settings (.claude/settings.local.json)
  • Updated cspell dictionary with reorganized word list

These changes should be documented in the CHANGELOG.

✅ Markdown files follow CommonMark specification

• Status: Pass
• Analysis: .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:1-3 follows CommonMark:
  • Proper heading formatting
  • No extra whitespace
  • Proper list formatting with hyphen bullet

---

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

• Status: Pass
• Analysis: No credentials found in any changed files.

✅ Input validation implemented

• Status: N/A
• Analysis: Configuration files do not process user input.

✅ Proper error handling

• Status: N/A
• Analysis: No code requiring error handling.

✅ No sensitive data in logs

• Status: Pass
• Analysis: No logging code added.

✅ Flag any checked in license files (.lic)

• Status: Pass
• Analysis: No .lic files or AQAAAD strings detected in the diff.

---

Summary

Critical Issues: 0
Warnings: 1
Info: 1

Issues requiring attention:

1. CHANGELOG.md not updated ❌

   • The PR adds new Claude configuration files and reorganizes the cspell dictionary
   • These changes should be documented in CHANGELOG.md

2. README documentation ⚠️

   • Consider documenting the new /senzing-code-review command in README.md if it's intended for end-users
   • Location: .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md

3. Note on .claude/settings.local.json ℹ️

   • The .local.json suffix typically indicates local-only settings
   • Verify this file should be committed vs listed in .gitignore
   • Currently it disables co-authored-by in commits - confirm this is desired repo-wide behavior

Positive aspects:

• Clean, well-formatted configuration files
• Proper alphabetization in cspell.json word list
• No security concerns
• Follows JSON formatting standards

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards