Skip to content

fix: correct typo in title of Japanese documentation for Selenium Grid components #2287

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

noritaka1166
Copy link
Contributor

@noritaka1166 noritaka1166 commented Apr 25, 2025

User description

Description

This PR fixes typos in the Japanese documentation for Selenium Grid components.

Motivation and Context

Types of changes

  • Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
  • Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
  • Improved translation
  • Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing document.
  • I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

PR Type

Documentation


Description

  • Corrected typo in Japanese documentation title

  • Ensured accurate naming of Selenium Grid components


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Documentation
components.ja.md
Corrected typo in Japanese documentation title                     

website_and_docs/content/documentation/grid/components.ja.md

  • Fixed typo in the title from 'Serenium' to 'Selenium'
  • Improved accuracy of documentation heading
  • +1/-1     

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • Copy link

    netlify bot commented Apr 25, 2025

    👷 Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.

    Visit the deploys page to approve it

    Name Link
    🔨 Latest commit afee1b1

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ No major issues detected

    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Apr 25, 2025

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    No code suggestions found for the PR.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant