-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 527
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unified datetime field name #925
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thanks for you contribution! This PR is duplicate with previous one, can I close 922 and keep this one? |
This PR is duplicate with previous one, can I close #922 and keep this one? ok |
@zfchai Please help resolve the conflict. |
Auto Review Result: Code Review SummaryChange Overview: The changes mainly involved renaming date properties from Identified IssuesIssue 1: Naming Consistency [Code Clarity]
Issue 2: Error Handling [Fault Tolerance]
Issue 3: Unnecessary Delays [Performance]
Overall EvaluationThe code changes improve naming consistency and add asynchronous processing capability, enhancing the overall scalability. However, further improvements can be made in terms of consistency checks across the project and fine-tuning performance aspects related to asynchronous task handling. Ensuring uniform naming and careful performance considerations will provide a cleaner, more efficient codebase. |
Updated info