Skip to content

Update schroedinger.md #438

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

limitless-100
Copy link

@limitless-100 limitless-100 commented Apr 4, 2025

  • Corrected the wrong spellings of "Schrodinger" in a few instances
  • Added another code example (Dirac equation)
  • Improved the readability of the short text under the Schrodinger equation code.
  • Part of my future plans include exploring if MethodOfLines.jl can actually solve "all" linear complex PDEs in entirety. The main aim is to look for possible exceptions.

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

* Corrected the wrong spellings of "Schrodinger" in a few instances
* Added another code example (Dirac equation)
* Improved the readability of the short text under the Schrodinger equation code.
* Part of my future plans include exploring if MethodOfLines.jl can actually solve "all" linear complex PDEs in entirety.  The main aim is to look for possible exceptions.
@xtalax
Copy link
Member

xtalax commented Apr 4, 2025

The correct spelling of "Schrödinger" is with the umlaut, which in german can be spelled oe, so the other correct spelling is "Schroedinger". With the umlaut is better though.

Looks good, could you rewrite the Equation statements with the ~ operator for consistent style though please.

Converting the "Equation" statements to ~ operators in order to maintain consistent writing style
@limitless-100 limitless-100 changed the title Update schroedinger.md (Using ~ operator) Update schroedinger.md Apr 4, 2025
@limitless-100
Copy link
Author

Thank you for the short education.
I have made the necessary corrections. Kindly confirm. Thank you.

@limitless-100 limitless-100 changed the title (Using ~ operator) Update schroedinger.md Update schroedinger.md Apr 4, 2025
@xtalax
Copy link
Member

xtalax commented Apr 5, 2025

I will "kindly confirm" when this example is ready, on my machine it looks like the solution is unstable, have you tried other solvers?

@limitless-100
Copy link
Author

I will try other solvers and notify you before the end of tomorrow. Thank you for your patience.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants