docs(UXC-Integration): fix example #11665
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @dobrinyonkov, I saw that you committed to these files recently. Could you please take a look? |
petyabegovska
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When implementing the UXC Integration example in our wrapper, I found a few issues, that don't break the example but can cause problems when implemented elsewhere. This PR fixes that.
Additionally, I noticed the following points:
UserSettingsViews seems inconsistentWhy are the search scopes filtered, shouldn't this work out of the box or am I missing something here? (In the wcr example I omitted the filter logic and it still seems to function as intended)I missed something 😄 you can disregard this point