Skip to content

base64ct: downgrade edition to 2021; MSRV 1.81 #1702

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 10, 2025

Conversation

tarcieri
Copy link
Member

We had some complaints about the steep MSRV upgrade from 1.60 to 1.85 which occurred in the 1.7.0 release (#1695).

This lowers the MSRV to just what we need for core::error::Error support, downgrading the edition in the process.

We can bump edition in a future release, once 1.85 has been out longer.

Closes #1695

We had some complaints about the steep MSRV upgrade from 1.60 to 1.85
which occurred in the 1.7.0 release (#1695).

This lowers the MSRV to just what we need for `core::error::Error`
support, downgrading the edition in the process.

We can bump edition in a future release, once 1.85 has been out longer.

Closes #1695
@tarcieri
Copy link
Member Author

Aah that's fun, need to move it out of the workspace too

@tarcieri tarcieri merged commit 7615a5b into master Mar 10, 2025
165 checks passed
@tarcieri tarcieri deleted the base64ct/downgrade-edition-and-msrv branch March 10, 2025 23:53
@tarcieri tarcieri mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2025
tarcieri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
We kept `base64ct` out of the toplevel workspace because we can't run
tests on it with its previous MSRV of 1.81 because that compiler can't
recognize the newer edition on all of the other crates in the workspace.

We originally attempted this upgrade in #1670 but reverted it in #1702
due to complaints we received in #1695.

Now that the needed MSRV of 1.85 is `N-2` of the current 1.87 stable,
we can hopefully perform this upgrade without receiving as many
complaints. Several other crates have bumped edition to 2024 already,
and edition upgrades are a time when MSRV bumps like this should be
expected.
tarcieri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
We kept `base64ct` out of the toplevel workspace because we can't run
tests on it with its previous MSRV of 1.81 because that compiler can't
recognize the newer edition on all of the other crates in the workspace.

We originally attempted this upgrade in #1670 but reverted it in #1702
due to complaints we received in #1695.

Now that the needed MSRV of 1.85 is `N-2` of the current 1.87 stable,
we can hopefully perform this upgrade without receiving as many
complaints. Several other crates have bumped edition to 2024 already,
and edition upgrades are a time when MSRV bumps like this should be
expected.
tarcieri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2025
)

We kept `base64ct` out of the toplevel workspace because we can't run
tests on it with its previous MSRV of 1.81 because that compiler can't
recognize the newer edition on all of the other crates in the workspace.

We originally attempted this upgrade in #1670 but reverted it in #1702
due to complaints we received in #1695.

Now that the needed MSRV of 1.85 is `N-2` of the current 1.87 stable,
we can hopefully perform this upgrade without receiving as many
complaints. Several other crates have bumped edition to 2024 already,
and edition upgrades are a time when MSRV bumps like this should be
expected.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

base64ct: un-yank v1.7.0 or publish v2.0.0?
1 participant