Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SWATCH-3217: CI: Configure Jenkins to ue the upshift cloud #4096

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

SWATCH-3217: CI: Configure Jenkins to ue the upshift cloud #4096

wants to merge 5 commits into from
+5 −4

Conversation

Sgitario
Copy link
Contributor

@Sgitario Sgitario commented Jan 10, 2025 •
edited by lindseyburnett
Loading

@Sgitario Sgitario force-pushed the jcarvaja/try_change_sa branch 2 times, most recently from 1d492b9 to af93cc3 Compare January 10, 2025 08:10
@Sgitario
Copy link
Contributor Author

The "stage-instance-admin" is missing a different permission:

Response Body: {"message":"pods is forbidden: User \"system:serviceaccount:dno--jenkins-csb-smqe:stage-instance-admin\" cannot create resource \"pods\" in API group \"\" in the namespace \"dno--jenkins-csb-smqe\""}

@lindseyburnett lindseyburnett changed the title CI: Configure Kubedock to use stage-instance-admin SWATCH-3217: CI: Configure Kubedock to use stage-instance-admin Jan 10, 2025
@Sgitario Sgitario added the hold Pull requests that are on hold for a reason specified in a PR comment label Jan 15, 2025
@Sgitario Sgitario force-pushed the jcarvaja/try_change_sa branch from af93cc3 to aebd64b Compare February 5, 2025 08:37
@Sgitario Sgitario changed the title SWATCH-3217: CI: Configure Kubedock to use stage-instance-admin SWATCH-3217: CI: Configure Jenkins to ue the upshift cloud Feb 5, 2025
@Sgitario
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sgitario commented Feb 5, 2025

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
hold Pull requests that are on hold for a reason specified in a PR comment
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@Sgitario