Add fet custom pattern - #51
Conversation
Hi @Nimok15, thanks for reviewing it. I've checked it and, indeed, it is using the base port as reference. I don't think it will have an issue with routing because the destination will move it to an absolute position, and layers are the same for all of them. However, I agree that it's not clean and is better using the right reference for the emitter. Thanks for noticing. By the way, I couldn't see your suggested change in the code itself, but I know what you meant and going to update the branch with a fix. Thanks, |
7167f77 to
ef9746d
Compare
ef9746d to
c7ead1e
Compare
c7ead1e to
284876a
Compare
|
Can you review and add a CI check? |
284876a to
a729f96
Compare
|
Hi Prof. @msaligane I've added the checks and seems that is passing. However, maybe it is good to add more for the extra features I'm including here. I'll work on this during the week. Thanks, |
Add possibility to create any patter with an array of fets and do an automatic routing.
Based on custom patterning implemented for #50
Note: If required we can remove commits from BJT just to enclose for custom pattern