You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been trying to optimize a pose graph in Sim(3) and noticed that the output is either incorrect, or g2o is doing something that I am not expecting. I have a simple test case which explains my problem:
g2o_minimal_example.zip
The output of g2o_minimal_example.py is:
(note: there are two trajectories 0-1-2 and 3-4-5 with loop closures between 0-3 and 2-5)
The SE(3) result is expected, the two trajectories are pulled together, however in Sim(3) the behaviour is strange. In g2o_full_example.py I have more test cases with different information values etc and similar strange behaviour when using SE3Expmap.
Any help or insights would be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have been trying to optimize a pose graph in Sim(3) and noticed that the output is either incorrect, or g2o is doing something that I am not expecting. I have a simple test case which explains my problem:
g2o_minimal_example.zip
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4923501/52222093-96b48b80-289a-11e9-8686-e60107c6c4bc.png)
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4923501/52222099-99af7c00-289a-11e9-9c47-bd91bae9bc36.png)
The output of
g2o_minimal_example.py
is:(note: there are two trajectories
0-1-2
and3-4-5
with loop closures between0-3
and2-5
)The SE(3) result is expected, the two trajectories are pulled together, however in Sim(3) the behaviour is strange. In
g2o_full_example.py
I have more test cases with different information values etc and similar strange behaviour when using SE3Expmap.Any help or insights would be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: