[release/2.4] Conditionalize versioning for conda

[ethanwee1]

https://ontrack-internal.amd.com/browse/SWDEV-528304
Build error in UB22.04 with release/2.4.

[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] LibMambaUnsatisfiableError: Encountered problems while solving:
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z]   - package numpy-1.21.2-py37h620df1f_0 requires python_abi 3.7 *_pypy37_pp73, but none of the providers can be installed
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] 
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] Could not solve for environment specs
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] The following packages are incompatible
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] ├─ numpy 1.21.2**  is installable with the potential options
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │  ├─ numpy 1.21.2 would require
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │  │  └─ python_abi 3.7 *_pypy37_pp73, which can be installed;
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │  ├─ numpy 1.21.2 would require
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │  │  ├─ python >=3.7,<3.8.0a0 , which can be installed;
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │  │  └─ python_abi 3.7.* *_cp37m, which can be installed;
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │  ├─ numpy 1.21.2 would require
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │  │  ├─ python >=3.8,<3.9.0a0 , which can be installed;
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │  │  └─ python_abi 3.8.* *_cp38, which can be installed;
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │  └─ numpy 1.21.2 would require
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │     ├─ python >=3.9,<3.10.0a0 , which can be installed;
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] │     └─ python_abi 3.9.* *_cp39, which can be installed;
[2025-04-17T05:48:09.594Z] └─ python 3.10**  is not installable because it conflicts with any installable versions previously reported.

Validation:
http://rocm-ci.amd.com/job/framework-pytorch-2.4-ub22-py3.10-ci_rel-6.4/34/

[rocm-repo-management-api]

Jenkins build for 88dbee1fd66c4fdba8bace8ef97d2d6a9c36dd0f commit finished as SUCCESS
Links: Blue Ocean view / Build artifacts

[jithunnair-amd]

@ethanwee1 @pruthvistony please update on the PR description what problem this is trying to solve. Then we can think about what's an appropriate validation step for this change.

[ethanwee1]

@ethanwee1 @pruthvistony please update on the PR description what problem this is trying to solve. Then we can think about what's an appropriate validation step for this change.

Added context in the description