New get_lang()

[jalvesaq]

Close #353

[jalvesaq]

This is an alternative way of checking if the cursor is within a code block that seems to be more robust than the current code.

[PMassicotte]

I think this is what we have already on this branch:

R.nvim/lua/r/quarto.lua

Line 27 in f03b8fa

local get_code_chunks = function(bufnr)

It also get some more information from the string, all parameters, like eval:true etc.

Should I PR it instead?

With that you could use this function

R.nvim/lua/r/quarto.lua

Lines 118 to 132 in 5199f6b

	--- This function gets the current code chunk based on the cursor position
	---@param bufnr integer The buffer number.
	---@return table
	M.get_current_code_chunk = function(bufnr)
	local row, _ = unpack(vim.api.nvim_win_get_cursor(0))
	local chunks = get_code_chunks(bufnr)
	if not chunks then return {} end
	for _, chunk in ipairs(chunks) do
	if row >= chunk.start_row and row <= chunk.end_row then return chunk end
	end
	return {}
	end

[jalvesaq]

Yes, your pull request also fixes the issue and is more complete.

[jalvesaq]

Actually neither of the two pull requests seems to fix the issue... I forgot to run :MDHeaders.

[PMassicotte]

Actually neither of the two pull requests seems to fix the issue... I forgot to run :MDHeaders.

Yeah, just found that. Tomorrow I will take time to investigate this.