-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
Presolve Refactor and Distributed OBBT #562
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+236
−61
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b27113c
temp bound fix for GAMS
aasgerr 96f7a0e
adding obbt
aasgerr cc20de1
refactor into two classes; add externally driven options
bknueven 6e67dc7
Merge pull request #3 from bknueven/presolve-obbt-bk
aasgerr f2e3e7f
small fixes
aasgerr 582bcf6
change verbose back to default False
bknueven 375c056
decoupling dual bound dependence on pyomo's obbt
aasgerr 995f9b4
change default verbose back
aasgerr e808edd
add netdes example
bknueven 7ceda4f
fix config for OBBT; remove try block
bknueven 4b7a140
Merge branch 'main' into presolve-obbt
bknueven 528b40a
better screen traces
bknueven 5406d60
Merge branch 'Pyomo:main' into presolve-obbt
aasgerr d52e920
update bound checking
aasgerr 7e07d4a
add subproblem tighteners as property
aasgerr 18b2bdc
changes in config to accommodate obbt
aasgerr 2f0cf8e
presolve documentation in generic_cylinders
aasgerr 6aec921
Merge branch 'main' into presolve-obbt
bknueven File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sigh. Through no fault of this PR, solver options are not what they should be. I'm pretty sure that cfg.max_solver_threads needs to be explicitly picked up here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was done to allow the use of GAMS solver options, which is done differently.