Skip to content

prompt: complete the ci_status no-gh path (PyAutoHeart#178, #179) - #318

Merged
Jammy2211 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
claude/heart-evidence-gaps-6svdjk
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

prompt: complete the ci_status no-gh path (PyAutoHeart#178, #179)#318
Jammy2211 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
claude/heart-evidence-gaps-6svdjk

Conversation

@Jammy2211

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Mind state for two tasks shipped in PyAutoLabs/PyAutoHeart#180 (merged a570d0a).

Net effect against main is just the two completion records plus the regenerated index — the draft/active/complete/ churn cancels out within the branch.

Why this is a PR rather than a push to main

/prm's close-out normally commits Mind straight to main. This session is pinned to the branch claude/heart-evidence-gaps-6svdjk and instructed never to push elsewhere without permission, so the records land here instead. Nothing else differs.

Records

  • complete/2026/08/ci-status-head-sha-without-gh.md — HEAD shas via git ls-remote when gh is absent.
  • complete/2026/08/ci-status-cloud-runs-drop-point.md — run conclusions via an age-bounded, MCP-populated drop point.

Each keeps the finding the work turned up, not just what landed:

lifecycle.py check and lifecycle.py index --check both OK.

complete/index.md conflicted on the merge from main and was resolved by regenerating it (lifecycle.py index --apply, 1132 records) rather than hand-merging a generated file.


Generated by Claude Code

claude added 5 commits August 25, 2026 12:23
A cloud /health run cleared all three named evidence gaps but stayed STALE
on six reasons, every one of them caused by `gh` being absent from the
session container so `ci_status` could not run.

`gh` is only transport there — the judgment already lives in
`heart/checks/ci_status.py`, which reads a REST-shaped `{"workflow_runs":
[...]}` payload from stdin. Split along the seam where the two halves have
genuinely different costs:

- read_ci_status_head_shas_without_gh: HEAD shas via `git ls-remote`. Needs
  no auth and no repo attachment, and on its own clears the reason blocking
  the release-validation gate.
- feed_ci_status_run_conclusions_from_an: run conclusions via an
  MCP-populated drop point, mirroring test_run.py's proven
  `cloud_validation.json` pattern.

Both keep network work out of the <30s tick and default to the five
release-gate libraries rather than the full ~20-repo poll set.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SeYsHrJsuH6wXjCCypKPzp
Both prompts are issued and implemented on PyAutoHeart
claude/heart-evidence-gaps-6svdjk, so advance them draft/ -> active/ and
register the tasks.

Neither entry claims a worktree: the work was done from a cloud session,
which has no ~/Code/PyAutoLabs-wt/ root. The branch is pushed, so a dev-box
session picks it up with a plain checkout rather than a worktree claim.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SeYsHrJsuH6wXjCCypKPzp
Both shipped in PyAutoHeart#180 (merged a570d0a -> main), so advance them
active/ -> complete/ with the full records.

Each record keeps the finding the work turned up rather than just what
landed: the coreutils `timeout` portability trap for #178, and for #179 that
the on_head guard caught runs that were fresh by clock and stale by commit —
which is why the age bound alone was never sufficient.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SeYsHrJsuH6wXjCCypKPzp
complete/index.md is generated — resolved by regenerating with
lifecycle.py index --apply rather than hand-merging the conflict, so it
carries both sides' records (1132).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SeYsHrJsuH6wXjCCypKPzp
@Jammy2211
Jammy2211 merged commit 25878d7 into main Aug 25, 2026
3 checks passed
@github-actions
github-actions Bot deleted the claude/heart-evidence-gaps-6svdjk branch August 25, 2026 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants