Skeleton of scoremat.rs #34
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Semi-automatedly derived from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/ToolBox/CPP_DOC/lxr/source/src/objects/scoremat/scoremat.asn
All comments were from the original, no point to indicate their provenance by keeping the "--" original comment symbol.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
I was curious and tested chatGPT on performing the conversion. It did pretty good, the input was https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/ToolBox/CPP_DOC/lxr/source/src/objects/scoremat/scoremat.asn
Had to manually contribute all the many comments. Caught some unnecessairly snake-cased attributes that I corrected.
As it became clear from my earlier (manual) work on entrezgene, I do not fully grasp what kind of glue code is now missing. Please also kindly comment on the quality of that code. I do not see that all attribute names would be named correctly for the serialization, I just refrained from editing all that in for you to better judge how far the automation worked.
I left the "--" of the original comments to communicate that the comment is indeed original. But that may be not so helpful for the automated documentation.