Skip to content

Rearrange proportions pages, phase 2#554

Merged
statasaurus merged 59 commits intoPSIAIMS:mainfrom
petelaud:ratesci
Mar 9, 2026
Merged

Rearrange proportions pages, phase 2#554
statasaurus merged 59 commits intoPSIAIMS:mainfrom
petelaud:ratesci

Conversation

@petelaud
Copy link
Contributor

@petelaud petelaud commented Mar 5, 2026

This PR contains a second batch of edits to the pages on confidence intervals for proportions, as part of ongoing work to address Issue #474 .

To avoid repetition of material across multiple pages, I have created a new document, method_summary/ci_for_prop_intro, and added a row in the index table for it. I hope that's OK.
I have then trimmed the sas/ci_for_prop file to be specific for the single proportion case, and created separate files in the SAS and R folders for ci_for_2indep_ prop and ci_for_paired_prop.
I have, so far, expanded and updated the contents of sas/ci_for_2indep_prop.
The other files need further work, so I've removed them from the index page for now.

I also contributed some updates to the CMH page while I was at it.

Note that I have also added a references.bib file (and corresponding .csl file), as an easier way to handle citations within the documents. These are referenced in the header of the .qmd documents. Please let me know if this approach causes problems when rendered on the site.

…(though the latter still works for now). Add details for SCAS method and GitHub repo for the macro, and citation for 'most commonly used method'
…portions, with reference to new general information page
@statasaurus
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for this! I will do the review today 😄

Copy link
Contributor

@statasaurus statasaurus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! thank you for adding the method summary it is really great. Your writing is a joy to read

@statasaurus statasaurus merged commit b8ecf85 into PSIAIMS:main Mar 9, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants