Skip to content

Conversation

@sharmav39
Copy link

No description provided.

<Manufacturer id="010D" name="e-Home AUTOMATION"></Manufacturer>
<Manufacturer id="0247" name="EASY SAVER Co. Inc"></Manufacturer>
<Manufacturer id="001A" name="Eaton"></Manufacturer>
<Manufacturer id="001A" name="Eaton">

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other Eaton devices (e.g. the 9540 predecessor) are under the Cooper manufacturer "001a" (lower case "a"). Consider putting the config there?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Eaton acquired Cooper in 2012, so the Z-Wave Alliance certification listings for newer products have no mention of Cooper.

https://products.z-wavealliance.org/products/3152/
vs
https://products.z-wavealliance.org/products/797/

I think it is more clear to have Eaton as the manufacturer and migrate older Cooper devices to the Eaton folder in the future as Eaton is now the owner of '001a'.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants