-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 671
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MIG] stock_split_picking: Migration to version 18.0 #1857
base: 18.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
(/home/jgrandguillaume/c2c/ProjetsEC/IFRC/Code/openerp_70_ifrc_core_dev/parts/generic-addons rev 29.1.1)
(/home/jgrandguillaume/c2c/ProjetsEC/IFRC/Code/openerp_70_ifrc_core_dev/parts/generic-addons rev 29.1.14)
… availability or ready to deliver
Both procurements will still be split to the sale order line. If one of the picking is canceled, the whole sale order will be in 'shipping_exception'.
when splitting a move with reservations, they have to be recomputed. code inspired from the implementation of stock_picking.rereserve_quants split the tests in travis.yml because another module is changing the states we get with only stock_split_picking installed fix a bug in stock_ownership_by_move which would cause wrong pack operations to be generated
Currently translated at 100.0% (26 of 26 strings) Translation: stock-logistics-workflow-16.0/stock-logistics-workflow-16.0-stock_split_picking Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-workflow-16-0/stock-logistics-workflow-16-0-stock_split_picking/es/
Currently translated at 100.0% (26 of 26 strings) Translation: stock-logistics-workflow-16.0/stock-logistics-workflow-16.0-stock_split_picking Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-workflow-16-0/stock-logistics-workflow-16-0-stock_split_picking/it/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: stock-logistics-workflow-17.0/stock-logistics-workflow-17.0-stock_split_picking Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-workflow-17-0/stock-logistics-workflow-17-0-stock_split_picking/
Currently translated at 100.0% (25 of 25 strings) Translation: stock-logistics-workflow-17.0/stock-logistics-workflow-17.0-stock_split_picking Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-workflow-17-0/stock-logistics-workflow-17-0-stock_split_picking/it/
Currently translated at 100.0% (25 of 25 strings) Translation: stock-logistics-workflow-17.0/stock-logistics-workflow-17.0-stock_split_picking Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-workflow-17-0/stock-logistics-workflow-17-0-stock_split_picking/es/
Currently translated at 100.0% (25 of 25 strings) Translation: stock-logistics-workflow-17.0/stock-logistics-workflow-17.0-stock_split_picking Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-workflow-17-0/stock-logistics-workflow-17-0-stock_split_picking/fr/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
/ocabot migration stock_split_picking |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functional test ok 👍
Small improvement on doc. It is no longer restricted to outgoing pickings. I was looking for something like this for incoming.
Please fix the Pre-commit, then we can go! 🟢
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | |||
This module adds a "Split" button on the outgoing pickings form. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This module adds a "Split" button on the outgoing pickings form. | |
This module adds a "Split" button on the pickings form. |
fd5ca6d
to
67d23df
Compare
@bosd @StefanRijnhart Just pushed the requested changes Really appreciate the interaction, do you guys mind if I tag you in future PR ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gbrito Sorry, not a big fan of tagging. It could get out of hand real quickly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM now 💯
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, #1788 is also ready to be included. |
No description provided.