Repository navigation
fix: correct tutorial claims, benchmark setup, and CI readiness - #390
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Final verificationHead: Findings auditAll 13 report findings were checked against the released 0.2.2 installer and effective function definitions.
The audit also found unsupported zero intervals in benchmark setup. The repair uses positive intervals. Product SQL, installers, SDK runtime, and historical benchmark results are unchanged. No new latency result is claimed. Testing
ReviewExact-head REV uses complete bounded diff coverage across all 10 changed paths. Earlier review findings about TCP regression coverage, scheduler units, and unbounded probes were repaired. Final result: PASS, no retained findings; 36,129/36,129 diff bytes reviewed across 3/3 batches, with complete receipts. Head and base remained unchanged. This covers the changed diff, not every unchanged source path. Scope limits: no full performance sweep, new latency measurement, or release qualification is implied. Merge and publication remain separate actions. |
Summary
Correct the tutorial and related health/latency guidance against released PgQue 0.2.2.
The latency findings F2/F9 describe one issue. The eight claims marked accurate remain supported. No product SQL, SQL installer, SDK runtime, or historical benchmark result bytes change.
Testing
This is not a new latency measurement or a full performance sweep. Fresh remote CI and exact-head REV are separate gates. No release is implied.