Skip to content

Add limitation for Direct Lake semantic models #5279

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add limitation for Direct Lake semantic models #5279

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@amirshwar
Copy link

@amirshwar amirshwar commented Oct 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Template apps known limitation officially documented:
Add limitation for Direct Lake semantic models

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot requested a review from JulCsc October 28, 2025 15:06
@prmerger-automator
Copy link
Contributor

@amirshwar : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 7710323:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
powerbi-docs/connect-data/service-template-apps-overview.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@v-dirichards v-dirichards requested a review from Copilot October 28, 2025 15:35
Copilot AI reviewed Oct 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds documentation for a known limitation regarding Direct Lake semantic models in Power BI template apps. The update clarifies that Direct Lake on OneLake semantic models are not supported.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@JulCsc

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged Tracking label for the PR review team label Oct 28, 2025
@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 6111d6c:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
powerbi-docs/connect-data/service-template-apps-overview.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@amirshwar amirshwar requested a review from Copilot October 29, 2025 13:34
Copilot AI reviewed Oct 29, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@amirshwar
Copy link
Author

@JulCsc
Can you please review this PR?
Added additional non-supported scenario of semantic models with Delta Lake connections to known limitation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

@JulCsc JulCsc Awaiting requested review from JulCsc

Assignees

@JulCsc JulCsc

Labels

aq-pr-triaged Tracking label for the PR review team Change sent to author do-not-merge powerbi/svc powerbi-template-apps/subsvc

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@amirshwar @v-dirichards @JulCsc