Skip to content

[apim] Remove support for parameterless SymmetricAlgorithm.Create() #127739

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+1 −1
Open

[apim] Remove support for parameterless SymmetricAlgorithm.Create() #127739

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion articles/api-management/api-management-policy-expressions.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ The following table lists the .NET Framework types and members allowed in policy
|`System.Security.Cryptography.SHA384Managed`|All|
|`System.Security.Cryptography.SHA512`|All|
|`System.Security.Cryptography.SHA512Managed`|All|
|`System.Security.Cryptography.SymmetricAlgorithm`|All|
|`System.Security.Cryptography.SymmetricAlgorithm`|All exception parameterless Create()|
Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Corrected 'exception' to 'except' for proper grammar.

Suggested change
|`System.Security.Cryptography.SymmetricAlgorithm`|All exception parameterless Create()|
|`System.Security.Cryptography.SymmetricAlgorithm`|All except parameterless Create()|

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@maksimkim - Please make suggested wording change, othewise LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@maksimkim - Can you respond to the requested changes or let us know if you would like us to commit them?

@dlepow - When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

|`System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.PublicKey`|All|
|`System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.RSACertificateExtensions`|All|
|`System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.X500DistinguishedName`|`Name`|
Expand Down