Remove unnecessary adjective "intuitive"

[pamelafox]

I found the adjective to be an unnecessary and distracting edition, since I do not find the experiences to be "intuitive". As a developer, I always use infrastructure-as-code or the CLI to avoid having to learn new user experiences (since most aren't actually intuitive, and must be learned).

[prmerger-automator]

@pamelafox : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

[learn-build-service-prod]

Learn Build status updates of commit 177b995:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
articles/postgresql/flexible-server/generative-ai-azure-ai-semantic-operators.md	✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

[v-dirichards]

@shreyaaithal

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

[v-dirichards]

@shreyaaithal Could you review this proposed update to your article and enter #sign-off in a comment if it's ready to merge?

Thanks!

[github-actions]

This pull request has been inactive for at least 14 days. If you are finished with your changes, don't forget to sign off. See the contributor guide for instructions.
Get Help
Docs Support Teams Channel
Resolve Merge Conflict

[v-ccolin]

I sent an email to the content owner today.

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

[prmerger-automator]

@pamelafox : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been inactive for at least 14 days. If you are finished with your changes, don't forget to sign off. See the contributor guide for instructions.
Get Help
Docs Support Teams Channel
Resolve Merge Conflict

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the adjective "intuitive" from documentation describing Azure AI Foundry experiences. The change reflects feedback that the term is subjective and potentially misleading, as many developers prefer infrastructure-as-code or CLI tools over learning new user interfaces.

Key changes:

• Simplified documentation language by removing a subjective descriptor

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[Copilot]

[nitpick] The phrase 'the experiences provided by' was removed along with 'intuitive', but this makes the sentence less clear. Consider revising to 'through the Azure AI Foundry portal' or 'using Azure AI Foundry' to maintain clarity about what Azure AI Foundry provides.

Suggested change

	1. [Create an Azure OpenAI service resource](/azure/ai-services/openai/how-to/create-resource) and **deploy a chat completion model** (for example, [`gpt-4.1`](/azure/ai-foundry/openai/concepts/models#gpt-41-series)). Alternatively, you can deploy and manage models through [Azure AI Foundry](/azure/ai-foundry/quickstarts/get-started-code#start-with-a-project-and-model).
	1. [Create an Azure OpenAI service resource](/azure/ai-services/openai/how-to/create-resource) and **deploy a chat completion model** (for example, [`gpt-4.1`](/azure/ai-foundry/openai/concepts/models#gpt-41-series)). Alternatively, you can deploy and manage models through the [Azure AI Foundry portal](/azure/ai-foundry/quickstarts/get-started-code#start-with-a-project-and-model).

[v-dirichards]

@pamelafox Can you resolve the merge conflict?

@shreyaaithal IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.