Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update ruff to 0.9.2 #53

Merged

Conversation

jd
Copy link
Member

@jd jd commented Jan 21, 2025

No description provided.

Change-Id: I2eea338589044f3aa84551c4569a1078c79babc6
Copy link

mergify bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Merge Protections

Your pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid.

🟢 Approval

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.
  • #approved-reviews-by >= 1

🟢 Continuous Integration

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.
  • all of:
    • check-success = test (3.10)
    • check-success = test (3.11)
    • check-success = test (3.12)
    • check-success = test (3.13)

🟢 Changelog requirements

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.
  • any of:
    • -title ~= ^feat
    • label = need changelog
    • label = skip changelog

🟢 Enforce conventional commit

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

Make sure that we follow https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

  • title ~= ^(fix|feat|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert)(?:\(.+\))?:

🟢 🔎 Reviews

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.
  • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0
  • #review-requested = 0
  • #review-threads-unresolved = 0

@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team January 21, 2025 13:59
@mergify mergify bot merged commit f200353 into main Jan 21, 2025
9 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot added the queued label Jan 21, 2025
@mergify mergify bot deleted the devs/jd/update-ruff/I2eea338589044f3aa84551c4569a1078c79babc6 branch January 21, 2025 14:01
@mergify mergify bot removed the queued label Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants