-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-744: Prepare for merge #567
Conversation
* GH-500: ready for an urged live test * GH-500: probably finished the deployment of Base, let's get the QA going * GH-500: removed an eprintln! * GH-500: version changed to 0.8.1 --------- Co-authored-by: Bert <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: KauriHero <[email protected]>
* GH-606: Initialize start_block to none to use latest block * GH-606: Apply PR feedback changes * GH-606: Apply PR feedback changes * GH-606: Apply PR feedback changes * GH-606: Apply PR review 4 feedback changes * GH-606: Squashing commits - Save start_block_nbr if no msg but send as non-Option - Always commit - Reduce logging levels and simplify - Follow the Option naming pattern * GH-600: set_start_block only called in accountant/scanners/mod.rs * GH-606: PR Feedback - parameterize a test * GH-606: Address PR feedback * GH-606: Implement parameterized test without crate macro
…ess_transaction_receipts
…_receipts_with_an_empty_vector
…are_recorded_in_databases
multinode_integration_tests/tests/communication_failure_test.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
node/src/accountant/scanners/mid_scan_msg_handling/payable_scanner/test_utils.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Copyright (c) 2019-2022, MASQ Network | ||
|
||
Copyright (c) 2017-2019, Substratum LLC and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | ||
Copyright (c) 2019-2024, MASQ Network |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should probably create a card in which we'll replace the year 2024 for 2025 in all occurrences of these copyrights.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here's the new card - #569
node/src/blockchain/blockchain_interface/blockchain_interface_web3/utils.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
node/src/blockchain/blockchain_interface/blockchain_interface_web3/utils.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
// &to[2..], | ||
// expected_body_suffix | ||
// ); | ||
// assert_eq!(bodies, vec!(expected_body)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just want to assure myself that you really agree this has been an intentionally left comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We needed this for historical point of view. So, I have migrated it to the card itself - #543 (comment)
// &to[2..], | ||
// expected_body_suffix | ||
// ); | ||
// assert_eq!(bodies, vec!(expected_body)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, you seem to have been consistent in being driven by this certain idea. That's a praise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as above
No description provided.