Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-744: Prepare for merge #567

Merged
merged 58 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

GH-744: Prepare for merge #567

merged 58 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

utkarshg6
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

masqrauder and others added 30 commits September 30, 2024 00:31
* GH-500: ready for an urged live test

* GH-500: probably finished the deployment of Base, let's get the QA going

* GH-500: removed an eprintln!

* GH-500: version changed to 0.8.1

---------

Co-authored-by: Bert <[email protected]>
* GH-539: Don't Panic

* GH-539: remove commented out code
* GH-606: Initialize start_block to none to use latest block

* GH-606: Apply PR feedback changes

* GH-606: Apply PR feedback changes

* GH-606: Apply PR feedback changes

* GH-606: Apply PR review 4 feedback changes

* GH-606: Squashing commits

- Save start_block_nbr if no msg but send as non-Option
- Always commit
- Reduce logging levels and simplify
- Follow the Option naming pattern

* GH-600: set_start_block only called in accountant/scanners/mod.rs

* GH-606: PR Feedback - parameterize a test

* GH-606: Address PR feedback

* GH-606: Implement parameterized test without crate macro
Copyright (c) 2019-2022, MASQ Network

Copyright (c) 2017-2019, Substratum LLC and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2019-2024, MASQ Network
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should probably create a card in which we'll replace the year 2024 for 2025 in all occurrences of these copyrights.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@utkarshg6 utkarshg6 Jan 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here's the new card - #569

node/src/blockchain/blockchain_bridge.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
// &to[2..],
// expected_body_suffix
// );
// assert_eq!(bodies, vec!(expected_body));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just want to assure myself that you really agree this has been an intentionally left comment.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@utkarshg6 utkarshg6 Jan 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We needed this for historical point of view. So, I have migrated it to the card itself - #543 (comment)

// &to[2..],
// expected_body_suffix
// );
// assert_eq!(bodies, vec!(expected_body));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, you seem to have been consistent in being driven by this certain idea. That's a praise.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as above

@utkarshg6 utkarshg6 merged commit ee5d17e into GH-744 Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants