feat: add the DataGrid component and demo page [preview] #105
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several enhancements to the Lumex UI framework, particularly focusing on the addition of a Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
desmondinho
temporarily deployed
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
desmondinho
temporarily deployed
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
desmondinho
temporarily deployed
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
Need to add tests. |
desmondinho
temporarily deployed
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
desmondinho
changed the title
desmondinho
changed the title
desmondinho
temporarily deployed
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
desmondinho
temporarily deployed
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 59
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (107)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor (1)
3-5: Consider using named parameters consistently.The
PreviewCodecomponent instantiation uses a mix of named (name: null) and unnamed ("DataGrid.Code.Colors") parameters, which could affect readability.Consider applying this change for consistency:
-<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.Colors")"> +<PreviewCode Code="@new(snippet: "DataGrid.Code.Colors")">If the
nameparameter is required, consider documenting why it's explicitly set to null.docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Radius.razor (1)
3-5: Consider improving code organization and readability.While the implementation is functional, there are a few improvements that could enhance maintainability:
- Consider using a more descriptive snippet identifier than "_Radius"
- Consider adding an @using directive for the Examples namespace to reduce the fully qualified path
+@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples + -<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code._Radius")"> - <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples._Radius /> +<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.RadiusExample")"> + <_Radius /> </PreviewCode>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Striped.razor (1)
1-5: Consider adding accessibility attributes to the example.Since this is a documentation example that will be used as a reference by other developers, consider enhancing it with proper ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation examples to promote accessibility best practices.
Would you like me to provide examples of accessibility enhancements that could be added to this preview?
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/OnRowClick.razor (1)
1-5: Consider expanding documentation coverage.Given that this is a preview for the OnRowClick functionality, consider adding:
- Documentation comments explaining the purpose and usage
- Examples demonstrating interaction with other key features mentioned in the requirements (sorting, comparing, etc.)
- Code comments showing expected event handling patterns
Would you like me to help generate additional documentation examples that cover these scenarios?
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/CustomFormat.razor (1)
3-5: Consider improving the code readability and parameter usage.A few suggestions to enhance the code:
- The
new()constructor could benefit from explicit type declaration- Setting
name: nullis redundant if it's the default value- Consider using a using directive to avoid the fully qualified component name
Here's the suggested improvement:
-<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.CustomFormat")"> - <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples.CustomFormat /> +@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples + +<PreviewCode Code="@new CodeSnippet(snippet: "DataGrid.Code.CustomFormat")"> + <CustomFormat /> </PreviewCode>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/EmptyContent.razor (1)
1-5: Consider enhancing the documentation structure.As this is a documentation component for the DataGrid's empty state, consider the following improvements:
- Add comments explaining the purpose of this preview
- Include different empty state scenarios (no data, loading error, filtered with no results)
- Consider adding accessibility examples for screen readers
Would you like assistance in implementing these enhancements?
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/DisabledItems.razor (2)
3-3: Simplify the tuple syntaxSince the
nameparameter is null, you can simplify the tuple syntax.-<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.DisabledItems")"> +<PreviewCode Code="@("DataGrid.Code.DisabledItems")">
1-5: Add XML documentation commentsConsider adding XML documentation comments to describe the purpose of this preview component and its relationship to the actual DataGrid example.
+@* + * Preview wrapper for the DisabledItems DataGrid example. + * This component demonstrates how to implement disabled items in a DataGrid + * by displaying a list of users with inactive status. + *@ @rendermode InteractiveWebAssemblydocs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/DynamicColumns.razor (1)
3-3: Consider providing a meaningful name for the code example.The
nameparameter is set tonull, but providing a descriptive name could improve documentation clarity and help users better understand the purpose of this example.-<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.DynamicColumns")"> +<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: "Dynamic Columns Example", snippet: "DataGrid.Code.DynamicColumns")">docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/LoadingContent.razor (1)
1-5: Consider documentation maintainability improvements.A few suggestions to improve the maintainability of the documentation:
- Consider adding a
@usingdirective at the top of the file or in_Imports.razorto avoid the fully qualified namespace:+@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples @rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly <PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.LoadingContent")"> - <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples.LoadingContent /> + <LoadingContent /> </PreviewCode>
- Ensure this example follows the same pattern as other DataGrid documentation components for consistency.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/ToolbarContent.razor (1)
3-5: Consider readability improvements for the code preview.While the implementation is functional, consider these improvements:
- Use named constructor parameters for better readability
- Consider adding a
@usingdirective to simplify the namespace+@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples + -<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.ToolbarContent")"> +<PreviewCode Code="@(new() { Snippet = "DataGrid.Code.ToolbarContent" })"> - <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples.ToolbarContent /> + <ToolbarContent /> </PreviewCode>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/RemoteDataSource.razor (1)
1-5: Ensure comprehensive feature demonstrationAs this is a preview component for remote data sources, ensure that the example demonstrates key DataGrid features mentioned in the requirements:
- Data scanning
- Sorting
- Comparing
- Action-taking capabilities
This will help users understand how to implement these features with remote data sources.
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/TemplateColumn.razor (3)
5-7: Consider adding a comment explaining the base render tree building.While the implementation is correct, adding a comment explaining why the base.BuildRenderTree call is necessary would improve maintainability.
@{ + // Ensure base column rendering is preserved while extending with template functionality base.BuildRenderTree( __builder ); }
9-18: Consider enhancing null safety and documentation.While the implementation is good, consider adding item null checking and more detailed documentation.
@code { - /// <inheritdoc /> + /// <summary> + /// Renders the content of a cell using the provided template. + /// </summary> + /// <param name="__builder">The render tree builder.</param> + /// <param name="item">The data item for the current row.</param> + /// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException">Thrown when item is null.</exception> protected internal override void RenderCellContent( RenderTreeBuilder __builder, T item ) { + ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(item); + if( ChildContent is not null ) { @ChildContent( item ) } } }
1-18: Consider documenting performance implications of templates.While the template-based approach provides excellent flexibility, it's important to consider and document performance implications when rendering large datasets. Consider adding documentation about:
- Best practices for template optimization
- When to use TemplateColumn vs. simpler column types
- Memoization strategies for complex templates
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Program.cs (1)
9-9: Document the HTTP client's purposeConsider adding a code comment explaining that this HTTP client registration is intended for the DataGrid component's data fetching capabilities. This will help future maintainers understand the dependency.
+// Register HTTP client for DataGrid component's data fetching operations builder.Services.AddHttpClient();src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor (1)
6-8: Simplify base render tree buildingThe explicit base.BuildRenderTree call in a Razor code block seems unnecessary unless there's a specific reason for this implementation.
If there's no specific requirement, consider removing the explicit call as the base functionality should be automatically handled:
-@{ - base.BuildRenderTree( __builder ); -}If this call is necessary, please add a comment explaining why.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Editing.razor (2)
8-15: Clarify IQueryable usage in example codeWhile using IQueryable suggests database integration capabilities, this example uses an in-memory list. Consider:
- Adding comments explaining this is a demo setup
- Demonstrating proper database integration patterns
Add documentation to clarify the example:
+ // Demo: Using IQueryable to demonstrate database-like querying capabilities + // In production, this would typically come from a database context private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User>
10-14: Enhance sample data diversityThe current sample data could better demonstrate various scenarios. Consider:
- Adding examples with longer names to show text wrapping
- Including special characters to demonstrate proper handling
- Adding more status variations
Here's a suggested enhancement:
private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> { new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), - new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) + new( "Diana María Lee-Smith", "Moderator", "Active" ), + new( "John-Paul O'Connor III", "Administrator", "Pending" ), + new( "Alexandra Von Rothschild", "Editor", "Inactive" ) }.AsQueryable();docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Usage.razor (2)
1-5: Enhance the example to demonstrate more DataGrid featuresAs this is the primary usage example, consider enhancing it to showcase more of the required features mentioned in the requirements:
- Add column headers using
Titleproperty- Demonstrate sorting capability
- Show how to handle user actions/interactions
- Add documentation comments explaining the PropertyColumn usage
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Account Status"> + <Template> + <LumexBadge Value="@context.Status" /> + </Template> + </PropertyColumn> </LumexDataGrid>
8-14: Consider expanding the sample datasetThe current dataset might not effectively demonstrate features like pagination or performance with larger datasets. Consider adding more sample records to showcase these aspects.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/EmptyContent.razor (4)
1-5: Consider adding column headers for better UXWhile the basic structure is good, the columns would benefit from explicit headers to improve user experience and accessibility.
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" EmptyContent="@_emptyContent"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Status" /> </LumexDataGrid>
8-12: Enhance empty state UX and maintainabilityThe empty state could be more informative and maintainable with the following improvements:
- Move styles to a dedicated CSS class
- Provide more context and possible actions to users
private readonly RenderFragment _emptyContent = - @<div class="flex flex-col space-y-2"> - <span class="text-3xl">\(o_o)/</span> - <span>No records found</span> + @<div class="empty-state"> + <span class="empty-state-icon">\(o_o)/</span> + <span class="empty-state-title">No records found</span> + <span class="empty-state-description">There are currently no users in the system.</span> + <button class="empty-state-action" @onclick="OnAddUser">Add New User</button> </div>;Add corresponding CSS:
.empty-state { @apply flex flex-col items-center space-y-2 p-4; } .empty-state-icon { @apply text-3xl text-gray-400; } .empty-state-title { @apply text-lg font-semibold; } .empty-state-description { @apply text-sm text-gray-600; } .empty-state-action { @apply mt-4 px-4 py-2 bg-primary text-white rounded hover:bg-primary-dark; }
14-16: Enhance data model with documentation and validationThe User record could benefit from XML documentation and data annotations. Also, consider using IEnumerable for this simple example.
- private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = Array.Empty<User>().AsQueryable(); + private readonly IEnumerable<User> _users = Array.Empty<User>(); - private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status ); + /// <summary> + /// Represents a user in the system with their basic information. + /// </summary> + private record User + { + /// <summary> + /// Gets or sets the user's full name. + /// </summary> + [Required(ErrorMessage = "Name is required")] + [StringLength(100)] + public string Name { get; init; } = string.Empty; + + /// <summary> + /// Gets or sets the user's role in the system. + /// </summary> + [Required(ErrorMessage = "Role is required")] + public string Role { get; init; } = string.Empty; + + /// <summary> + /// Gets or sets the user's current status. + /// </summary> + [Required(ErrorMessage = "Status is required")] + public string Status { get; init; } = string.Empty; + }
1-17: Add unit tests for the componentAs this is a documentation example that demonstrates important functionality, consider adding unit tests to verify:
- Empty state rendering
- Property column configurations
- Data binding behavior
Would you like me to help generate the unit test suite for this component?
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Loading.razor (2)
8-14: Improve data initialization to better represent real-world scenariosThe current implementation uses
IQueryablewith an in-memory List, which might mislead developers about proper usage patterns.Consider these improvements:
- Add XML comments explaining this is just for demo purposes
- Include more diverse sample data to demonstrate handling of:
- Long text content
- Empty/null values
- Special characters
+ // Note: This is simplified for demo purposes. + // In real applications, this would typically come from a database or API. private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> { new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), - new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) + new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ), + new( "Eve Williams", null, "Pending" ), + new( "Frank O'Connor", "Editor", "" ), + new( "Grace Liu", "Super Administrator with very long role name", "Active" ) }.AsQueryable();
16-16: Add documentation to the User recordWhile the record is simple, adding documentation would help users understand the purpose of each property.
Consider adding XML documentation:
- private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status ); + /// <summary> + /// Represents a user in the system for demonstration purposes. + /// </summary> + /// <param name="Name">The full name of the user</param> + /// <param name="Role">The user's role in the system</param> + /// <param name="Status">Current status (Active/Inactive/Pending)</param> + private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status );docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Striped.razor (4)
1-5: Enhance documentation and accessibility of the exampleWhile the implementation is clean, consider these improvements for better documentation and accessibility:
- Add column headers using the
Titleproperty- Add documentation comments explaining the striped functionality
- Include ARIA labels for better screen reader support
+@* Example demonstrating LumexDataGrid with striped rows for better readability *@ -<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" Striped="@true"> +<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" Striped="@true" aria-label="Users list"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Account Status" /> </LumexDataGrid>
8-14: Consider using IEnumerable for in-memory collectionsUsing
IQueryablefor an in-memory list might be misleading as it suggests database-like querying capabilities. For documentation examples,IEnumerablewould be more appropriate unless demonstrating specificIQueryablefeatures.Additionally, consider using an enumeration for the Status field to ensure valid values.
- private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> + private readonly IEnumerable<User> _users = new List<User> { new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) - }.AsQueryable(); + }; + private enum UserStatus + { + Active, + Inactive, + Pending + }
16-16: Add XML documentation to the User recordConsider adding XML documentation to improve the example's educational value and provide better IntelliSense support.
- private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status ); + /// <summary> + /// Represents a user in the system with their basic information. + /// </summary> + /// <param name="Name">The full name of the user</param> + /// <param name="Role">The assigned role of the user</param> + /// <param name="Status">The current account status</param> + private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status );
1-5: Consider demonstrating sorting functionalitySince the PR objectives mention sorting capabilities as a key feature, consider enhancing this example to demonstrate column sorting:
-<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" Striped="@true"> +<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" Striped="@true" AllowSorting="true"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" Sortable="true" />docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Hoverable.razor (2)
1-5: Consider enhancing the DataGrid configuration for better usability and accessibility.The current implementation could benefit from the following improvements:
- Add explicit column headers using the
Titleproperty- Consider adding sorting capability for better data exploration
- Include ARIA labels for better screen reader support
Consider applying these enhancements:
-<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" Hoverable="@true"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> +<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" + Hoverable="@true" + aria-label="User Information Grid"> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Account Status" Sortable="true" />
8-14: Consider optimizing the data structure and initialization.Using IQueryable for a static in-memory collection might be unnecessary unless you plan to add database integration. Also, consider adding validation for the Name and Role fields.
Consider this approach:
-private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> +private readonly IReadOnlyList<User> _users = new List<User>Additionally, consider adding data annotations to the User record:
private record User { [Required] [StringLength(100)] public string Name { get; init; } [Required] [StringLength(50)] public string Role { get; init; } public UserStatus Status { get; init; } }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/_Layout.razor (2)
1-5: Enhance the example with headers and accessibility attributes.As this is a documentation example, consider enhancing it to better demonstrate DataGrid capabilities and improve accessibility:
-<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" Layout="@Layout.Fixed"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> +<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" + Layout="@Layout.Fixed" + aria-label="Users List"> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Status" /> </LumexDataGrid>
8-14: Consider extracting test data initialization.The use of IQueryable suggests support for server-side operations, which is good. However, consider extracting the test data initialization to a separate method for better maintainability:
-private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> -{ - new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), - new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), - new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), - new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) -}.AsQueryable(); +private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = GetSampleUsers(); + +private static IQueryable<User> GetSampleUsers() => + new List<User> + { + new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), + new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), + new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), + new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) + }.AsQueryable();docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Sorting.razor (1)
1-5: Consider enhancing the sorting configuration for better UX.While the basic sorting setup works, consider these improvements:
- Add column headers using the
Titleproperty- Specify a default sort column and direction
- Add visual indicators for the current sort state
Consider applying this enhancement:
-<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users"> +<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" DefaultSortColumn="Name" DefaultSortDirection="SortDirection.Ascending"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Sortable="@true" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Sortable="@true" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Sortable="@true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" Sortable="@true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" Sortable="@true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Account Status" Sortable="@true" /> </LumexDataGrid>src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/TemplateColumn.razor.cs (2)
3-3: Consider using a more specific namespaceThe namespace should reflect the component's location in the folder hierarchy. Consider changing it to
LumexUI.Components.DataGrid.Columnsto better organize the codebase and prevent potential naming conflicts.-namespace LumexUI; +namespace LumexUI.Components.DataGrid.Columns;
5-9: Enhance documentation with usage examplesWhile the documentation is clear, it would be more helpful to include:
- An example of how to use the template column
- Information about the context provided to the template
- Any limitations or considerations when using templates
/// <summary> /// A component representing a <see cref="LumexDataGrid{T}"/> column whose cells render a supplied template. +/// <example> +/// <code> +/// <TemplateColumn TItem="Employee"> +/// <ChildContent Context="employee"> +/// <div>@employee.FirstName @employee.LastName</div> +/// </ChildContent> +/// </TemplateColumn> +/// </code> +/// </example> /// </summary> /// <typeparam name="T">The type of data represented by each row in the grid.</typeparam>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/CustomFormat.razor (2)
1-6: Consider enhancing the grid's usability with additional configurations.While the basic setup is functional, consider adding:
- Column headers using the
Titleproperty- Column width constraints for better layout control
- Sorting capabilities for better data exploration
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Salary)" Format="C0" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="Employee Name" Width="200px" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="Position" Width="150px" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Salary)" Title="Annual Salary" Format="C0" Width="150px" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Status" Width="100px" Sortable="true" /> </LumexDataGrid>
9-15: Consider simplifying the data source for the demo.Using
IQueryablefor an in-memory list adds unnecessary complexity in a demo context. Since no query operations are being performed,IEnumerable<User>would be more appropriate.- private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> + private readonly IEnumerable<User> _users = new List<User> { new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", 3000, "Active" ), new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", 2000, "Inactive" ), new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", 1500, "Pending" ), new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", 2500, "Active" ) - }.AsQueryable(); + };docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/DisabledItems.razor (2)
1-6: Consider enhancing the grid's usability with column headers and tooltips.The grid structure is correct, but the user experience could be improved.
Consider applying these enhancements:
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" DisabledItems="@DisabledUsers"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" + Tooltip="Full name of the user" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" + Tooltip="Assigned role in the system" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Account Status" + Tooltip="Current status of the user account" /> </LumexDataGrid>
9-15: Consider using IReadOnlyList for in-memory collections.Using IQueryable for a small in-memory collection adds unnecessary complexity. IReadOnlyList would be more appropriate here.
- private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> + private readonly IReadOnlyList<User> _users = new List<User> { new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) - }.AsQueryable(); + };docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/Types.cs (1)
31-31: LGTM! Consider adding XML documentation.The change from a boolean
lockedto a nullableNavItemStatusenum improves extensibility and better represents the component's state. Consider adding XML documentation to describe the available status values and their implications.Add XML documentation to clarify the usage:
+/// <summary> +/// Represents a navigation item with an optional status. +/// </summary> +/// <param name="name">The name of the navigation item.</param> +/// <param name="status">Optional status indicating the item's state (Soon, Preview).</param> public class NavigationItem( string name, NavItemStatus? status = null ) { public string Name { get; } = name; + /// <summary> + /// Gets the status of the navigation item. Null indicates a regular item. + /// </summary> public NavItemStatus? Status { get; } = status; }Also applies to: 34-34
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/NavItemBadge.razor (2)
3-8: Consider using a display text mapping for status valuesInstead of directly using
ToString()on the enum, consider creating a mapping for display text. This would make it easier to customize the text, support localization, and maintain consistency across the application.- @Status.ToString() + @GetStatusDisplayText(Status!.Value) @code { + private static readonly Dictionary<NavItemStatus, string> _displayText = new() + { + [NavItemStatus.Soon] = "Soon", + [NavItemStatus.Preview] = "Preview" + }; + + private static string GetStatusDisplayText(NavItemStatus status) => _displayText[status];
13-23: Consider extracting CSS classes into constantsThe hardcoded Tailwind CSS classes could be moved to constants or a configuration object for better maintainability and reusability. This would also make it easier to document the visual effect of each class.
+ private static class Styles + { + public const string Padding = "px-1.5 py-[3px]"; + public const string Shape = "rounded-full ring-1"; + public const string Typography = "font-semibold text-[0.5rem] uppercase leading-none"; + } private string? RootClasses => ElementClass.Empty() - .Add( "px-1.5" ) - .Add( "py-[3px]" ) - .Add( "rounded-full" ) - .Add( "ring-1" ) - .Add( "font-semibold" ) - .Add( "text-[0.5rem]" ) - .Add( "uppercase" ) - .Add( "leading-none" ) + .Add(Styles.Padding) + .Add(Styles.Shape) + .Add(Styles.Typography) .Add( _variants[Status!.Value], when: Status.HasValue ) .ToString();docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/RemoteDataSource.razor (1)
24-26: Consider improving data models for better type safety and reusability.The current model implementation could benefit from:
- Moving models to a separate file for reusability
- Converting string properties to appropriate numeric types
- Adding documentation
Consider creating a new file
Models/StarWarsModels.cs:namespace LumexUI.Docs.Client.Models; /// <summary> /// Represents a person from the Star Wars universe /// </summary> public record Person { public string Name { get; init; } = string.Empty; public decimal Height { get; init; } // in centimeters public decimal Mass { get; init; } // in kilograms // Add parsing logic for string to decimal conversion public static Person FromApi(ApiPerson person) => new() { Name = person.Name, Height = decimal.TryParse(person.Height, out var h) ? h : 0, Mass = decimal.TryParse(person.Mass, out var m) ? m : 0 }; } /// <summary> /// Represents the SWAPI people endpoint response /// </summary> public record PersonQueryResult( int Count, string Next, string Previous, Person[] Results );src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/_CheckboxColumn.razor (2)
1-3: Add XML documentation for the component classConsider adding XML documentation to describe the purpose and usage of the CheckboxColumn component. This will improve IntelliSense support and make the component more discoverable.
@namespace LumexUI +/// <summary> +/// A column that renders checkboxes for row selection in a data grid. +/// </summary> +/// <typeparam name="T">The type of data items in the grid.</typeparam> @inherits LumexColumnBase<T> @typeparam T
11-19: Add null check and improve accessibilityThe header cell implementation should handle potential null references and improve accessibility.
protected internal override void RenderHeaderCellContent( RenderTreeBuilder __builder ) { - if( DataGrid.SelectionMode is SelectionMode.Multiple ) + if( DataGrid?.SelectionMode is SelectionMode.Multiple ) { <LumexCheckbox Color="@DataGrid.Color" + AriaLabel="Select all rows" Value="@AreAllItemsSelected()" ValueChanged="@SelectAllItemsAsync" /> } }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/CustomCellsTemplateColumn.razor (1)
1-4: Consider enhancing column configurations for better UX.The property columns could benefit from explicit configurations:
- Add Title for each column
- Consider adding sorting capability
- Specify appropriate alignment based on content type
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="Name" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="Role" Sortable="true" Align="@Align.Center" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Status" Sortable="true" Align="@Align.Center" />docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/DynamicColumns.razor (2)
1-5: Consider enhancing the grid with additional features and improved column headers.While the basic implementation is correct, consider these improvements:
- Add explicit column headers using the
Titleproperty- Demonstrate sorting capability
- Add tooltips for better user experience
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Visible="@_isRoleColShown" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Visible="@_isStatusColShown" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" Visible="@_isRoleColShown" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Account Status" Visible="@_isStatusColShown" Sortable="true" /> </LumexDataGrid>
7-11: Enhance accessibility and user experience of the checkbox group.Consider adding:
- ARIA labels for better screen reader support
- Helper text to indicate the initial state
- Tooltips to explain the impact of toggling columns
<LumexCheckboxGroup Label="Select columns to show" - Classes="@(new() { Wrapper = "flex-row" })"> + Classes="@(new() { Wrapper = "flex-row" })" + HelperText="All columns are shown by default" + aria-label="Column visibility controls"> - <LumexCheckbox @bind-Value="@_isRoleColShown">Role</LumexCheckbox> - <LumexCheckbox @bind-Value="@_isStatusColShown">Status</LumexCheckbox> + <LumexCheckbox @bind-Value="@_isRoleColShown" + aria-label="Toggle Role column visibility" + ToolTip="Show/Hide Role column">Role</LumexCheckbox> + <LumexCheckbox @bind-Value="@_isStatusColShown" + aria-label="Toggle Status column visibility" + ToolTip="Show/Hide Status column">Status</LumexCheckbox> </LumexCheckboxGroup>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/OnRowClick.razor (3)
1-7: Consider enhancing the DataGrid with headers and accessibility features.The current implementation could benefit from the following improvements:
- Add column headers using the
Titleproperty- Consider adding sorting capability where appropriate
- Include ARIA labels for better accessibility
<LumexDataGrid T="User" Data="@_users" OnRowClick="@OnRowClickHandler"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="Name" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="Role" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Status" Sortable="true" /> </LumexDataGrid>
9-15: Improve the clicked row information display format.The current raw data display could be enhanced for better readability and user experience.
@if( _clickedRow is not null ) { - <div class="text-small"> - <p>Row data: @_clickedRow.Item</p> - <p>Row index: @_clickedRow.Index</p> + <div class="text-small mt-3 p-3 border rounded"> + <h5>Selected Row Details:</h5> + <p><strong>Name:</strong> @_clickedRow.Item.Name</p> + <p><strong>Role:</strong> @_clickedRow.Item.Role</p> + <p><strong>Status:</strong> @_clickedRow.Item.Status</p> + <p><strong>Row Index:</strong> @_clickedRow.Index</p> </div> }
28-31: Add error handling to the click handler.The click handler should include error handling for robustness.
- private void OnRowClickHandler( DataGridRowClickEventArgs<User> args ) - { - _clickedRow = args; - } + private void OnRowClickHandler( DataGridRowClickEventArgs<User> args ) + { + try + { + ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(args); + _clickedRow = args; + StateHasChanged(); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + // Consider adding proper error logging here + Console.WriteLine($"Error handling row click: {ex.Message}"); + } + }docs/LumexUI.Docs/Program.cs (1)
12-12: LGTM! Consider adding security policies.The HTTP client factory registration is a good practice for proper lifecycle management. However, consider configuring security policies for the HTTP client.
Consider adding default security headers and policies:
-builder.Services.AddHttpClient(); +builder.Services.AddHttpClient(configure => +{ + configure.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add("X-Frame-Options", "DENY"); + configure.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff"); + configure.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add("X-XSS-Protection", "1; mode=block"); +});src/LumexUI/Common/Events/DataGridRowClickEventArgs.cs (2)
16-16: Consider using init-only setters for immutability.The properties are effectively read-only but could benefit from using C# 9.0's init-only setters to ensure true immutability.
- public T Item { get; } + public T Item { get; init; } - public int Index { get; } + public int Index { get; init; }Also applies to: 21-21
5-8: Enhance XML documentation with examples.While the current documentation is good, it would be more helpful with usage examples.
/// <summary> /// Provides data for the <see cref="LumexDataGrid{T}.OnRowClick"/> event, /// including the clicked item and its index. /// </summary> +/// <remarks> +/// Example usage: +/// <code> +/// private void OnRowClick(DataGridRowClickEventArgs<User> args) +/// { +/// var clickedUser = args.Item; +/// var rowIndex = args.Index; +/// // Handle the click event +/// } +/// </code> +/// </remarks>docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/CustomCells.razor (2)
15-21: Consider the necessity of IQueryable and use of real namesTwo suggestions for improvement:
- Unless there's a specific requirement for IQueryable operations, consider using IEnumerable instead
- For documentation/example purposes, it's better to use obviously fictional names
- private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> + private readonly IEnumerable<User> _users = new List<User> { - new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), - new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), - new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), - new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) + new( "User One", "Administrator", "Active" ), + new( "User Two", "Editor", "Inactive" ), + new( "User Three", "Viewer", "Pending" ), + new( "User Four", "Moderator", "Active" ) - }.AsQueryable(); + };
30-30: Add documentation and null safety to the User recordConsider adding XML documentation and null safety attributes to improve maintainability and prevent null reference issues.
- private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status ); + /// <summary> + /// Represents a user in the system with their basic information. + /// </summary> + private record User( + [property: Required] string Name, + [property: Required] string Role, + [property: Required] string Status + );docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/LoadingContent.razor (2)
1-7: Consider enhancing the DataGrid configuration for better usability.
- The
Loadingproperty is hardcoded totrue, which means the grid will permanently display the loading state. Consider making this dynamic.- The columns lack headers which could improve readability.
Consider applying these improvements:
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" - Loading="@true" + Loading="@_isLoading" LoadingContent="@_loadingContent"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="Name" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="Role" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Status" /> </LumexDataGrid>
10-27: Enhance loading indicator accessibility.While the SVG implementation is good, it could benefit from additional accessibility attributes to better support screen readers.
Add appropriate ARIA attributes:
<svg class="animate-spin -ml-1 mr-3 h-5 w-5 text-indigo-500" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" fill="none" + role="status" + aria-label="Loading..." viewBox="0 0 24 24">docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/StickyHeader.razor (2)
1-7: Consider enhancing accessibility for scrollable contentWhile the sticky header with max height creates a scrollable view, consider adding keyboard navigation support and ARIA attributes for better accessibility.
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" StickyHeader="@true" - Class="max-h-64"> + Class="max-h-64" + role="grid" + aria-label="User List" + TabIndex="0">Also, consider demonstrating sorting capabilities since it's mentioned in the PR objectives.
10-32: Consider refining the data source implementationA few suggestions for improvement:
- Using
IQueryablemight be unnecessary for client-side data. Consider usingIReadOnlyList<User>instead.- Status values should be validated against a predefined set of values.
- Consider using more neutral status values in documentation examples.
- private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> + private readonly IReadOnlyList<User> _users = new List<User> { - new("Alice Johnson", "Admin", "Active"), + new("Alice Johnson", "Admin", "Available"), // ... other entries ... - }.AsQueryable(); + };docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Shadows.razor (4)
1-5: Consider enhancing the DataGrid configuration with additional features.The current implementation could benefit from explicit column headers and additional features to better demonstrate the DataGrid's capabilities.
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" Shadow="@_shadow"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Current Status" Sortable="true" /> </LumexDataGrid>
7-22: Enhance accessibility for shadow selection controls.The radio button group could benefit from improved accessibility features.
-<fieldset class="flex gap-4"> +<fieldset class="flex gap-4" role="radiogroup" aria-label="Shadow size options"> + <legend class="sr-only">Select shadow size</legend> @foreach( var shadow in _shadows ) { var value = shadow.ToString();
25-31: Simplify data source implementation.Using IQueryable for a static in-memory list adds unnecessary complexity.
- private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> + private readonly IReadOnlyList<User> _users = new List<User> { new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) - }.AsQueryable(); + };
47-47: Consider adding validation for User properties.The User record could benefit from property constraints and validation.
- private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status ); + private record User( + [property: Required(ErrorMessage = "Name is required")] string Name, + [property: Required(ErrorMessage = "Role is required")] string Role, + [property: Required][property: AllowedValues("Active", "Inactive", "Pending")] string Status + );docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/_Radius.razor (3)
1-5: Consider enhancing the grid columns with additional properties.The grid columns could benefit from explicit headers and width specifications for better user experience.
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" Radius="@_radius"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" Width="200px" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" Width="150px" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Status" Width="100px" /> </LumexDataGrid>
25-31: Consider using IEnumerable for static data.Using
IQueryablefor a static list doesn't provide any benefits and might be misleading. Consider usingIEnumerableinstead.- private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> + private readonly IEnumerable<User> _users = new List<User> { new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) - }.AsQueryable(); + };
47-47: Consider enhancing the User record with validation and enum for Status.The User record could benefit from data annotations and using an enum for the Status field.
- private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status ); + private record User( + [Required][MaxLength(100)] string Name, + [Required][MaxLength(50)] string Role, + UserStatus Status + ); + + private enum UserStatus + { + Active, + Inactive, + Pending + }src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor (1)
24-42: Consider supporting additional data types.The current implementation only handles string and numeric types. Consider adding support for:
- Boolean (checkbox)
- DateTime (date picker)
- Enum (dropdown)
- Custom types
Would you like me to provide an example implementation for these additional types?
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Colors.razor (4)
1-7: Consider enhancing the DataGrid example with more featuresWhile the basic setup is correct, consider demonstrating more DataGrid capabilities:
- Add custom column headers using the
Titleparameter- Show sorting functionality
- Add filtering capabilities
- Include tooltips or help text
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" Color="@_color" SelectionMode="@SelectionMode.Single"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Current Status" Sortable="true" /> </LumexDataGrid>
52-52: Add XML documentation for the User recordConsider adding XML documentation to improve code maintainability and IDE support.
- private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status ); + /// <summary> + /// Represents a user in the DataGrid example. + /// </summary> + /// <param name="Name">The full name of the user</param> + /// <param name="Role">The user's role in the system</param> + /// <param name="Status">The current status of the user</param> + private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status );
27-33: Enhance sample data to demonstrate more scenariosConsider expanding the sample data to showcase how the DataGrid handles:
- Long text values
- Special characters
- Different status states
private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> { new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), - new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) + new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ), + new( "Eduardo García-López", "Super Administrator", "Suspended" ), + new( "Fatima Al-Sayed", "Content Manager with Extended Privileges", "Under Review" ) }.AsQueryable();
47-50: Add validation to color selection handlerConsider adding validation to ensure only valid theme colors are applied.
private void OnColorSelect( ThemeColor value ) { + if (!_colors.Contains(value)) + { + return; + } _color = value; }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/ToolbarContent.razor (4)
4-13: Consider debouncing the search inputThe
OnInputbehavior might trigger too many filter operations as the user types. Consider adding debounce functionality to improve performance with large datasets.<LumexTextbox Placeholder="Search by name..." - Behavior="@InputBehavior.OnInput" + Behavior="@InputBehavior.OnDebounce" + DebounceInterval="300" Class="max-w-xs" @bind-Value="@_nameFilter">
9-11: Use type-safe size parameterThe icon size is passed as a string which could lead to runtime errors. Consider using a strongly-typed size parameter if available.
<LumexIcon Icon="@Icons.Rounded.Search" - Size="@new("20")" + Size="@IconSize.Medium" Color="@ThemeColor.Default" />
24-30: Consider using an enumeration for Status valuesThe Status field uses string literals which could lead to inconsistencies. Consider defining an enumeration for valid status values.
+ private enum UserStatus { Active, Inactive, Pending } - private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status ); + private record User( string Name, string Role, UserStatus Status ); private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> { - new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), + new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", UserStatus.Active ), // Update other entries similarly }.AsQueryable();
49-49: Add XML documentation for the User recordConsider adding XML documentation to improve code maintainability and IDE support.
+/// <summary> +/// Represents a user in the system with basic profile information. +/// </summary> +/// <param name="Name">The full name of the user</param> +/// <param name="Role">The role assigned to the user</param> +/// <param name="Status">The current status of the user</param> private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status );docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/SingleSelection.razor (3)
5-7: Consider adding header text for better usabilityThe PropertyColumns could benefit from explicit header text to ensure clear column labels.
- <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" HeaderText="Name" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" HeaderText="Role" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" HeaderText="Status" />
41-47: Consider using IEnumerable for in-memory collectionsUsing IQueryable for an in-memory list doesn't provide any benefits and might be misleading. Consider using IEnumerable instead.
- private readonly IQueryable<User> _users = new List<User> + private readonly IEnumerable<User> _users = new List<User> { new( "Alice Johnson", "Administrator", "Active" ), new( "Bob Smith", "Editor", "Inactive" ), new( "Charlie Brown", "Viewer", "Pending" ), new( "Diana Lee", "Moderator", "Active" ) - }.AsQueryable(); + };
67-67: Consider making User record public and adding validationThe User record could be:
- Made public for reuse in other examples
- Enhanced with validation for the Status field using a dedicated enum
- private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status ); + public record User( string Name, string Role, UserStatus Status ); + + public enum UserStatus + { + Active, + Inactive, + Pending + }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/MultipleSelection.razor (2)
1-8: Consider enhancing the DataGrid's accessibility and user experience.The grid implementation could benefit from additional configurations:
- Add column headers using the
Titleproperty for better accessibility- Consider adding sorting capability for better data exploration
- Include tooltips for column headers to provide additional context
<LumexDataGrid Data="@_users" Color="@_color" SelectionMode="@SelectionMode.Multiple" @bind-SelectedItems="@_selectedUsers"> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> - <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" Title="User Name" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" Title="User Role" Sortable="true" /> + <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" Title="Current Status" Sortable="true" /> </LumexDataGrid>
27-38: Improve selected users display and accessibility.The current implementation could be enhanced for better user experience and accessibility:
- Override ToString() in the User record or explicitly specify which user properties to display
- Add proper ARIA attributes for screen readers
- Consider adding a scrollable container for many selections
@if( _selectedUsers.Count > 0 ) { - <div class="text-small"> - <p>Selected users:</p> - <ul> + <div class="text-small" role="region" aria-label="Selected Users"> + <p id="selected-users-heading">Selected users:</p> + <ul class="max-h-60 overflow-y-auto" aria-labelledby="selected-users-heading"> @foreach( var user in _selectedUsers ) { - <li>@user</li> + <li>@user.Name (@user.Role)</li> } </ul> </div> }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Virtualization.razor (4)
4-14: Consider making the grid more configurableA few suggestions to improve flexibility:
- Consider making ItemSize configurable through a parameter
- The max-h-64 class limits the height - consider making this configurable
- Add loading state handling for better UX during data fetching
Consider this approach:
<LumexDataGrid DataSource="@_foodRecallProvider" - ItemSize="48" + ItemSize="@RowHeight" Virtualize="@true" StickyHeader="@true" - Class="max-h-64"> + Class="@($"max-h-{MaxHeight} {Class}")"> + <LoadingTemplate> + <div class="loading-spinner">Loading...</div> + </LoadingTemplate>
16-18: Enhance the results display with loading and error statesThe results count display could be more informative and handle edge cases better.
Consider this enhancement:
-<p class="text-small"> - <strong>@_resultsCount results found</strong> -</p> +<p class="text-small"> + @if (_isLoading) + { + <span>Loading results...</span> + } + else if (_error != null) + { + <span class="text-danger">@_error</span> + } + else + { + <strong>@_resultsCount results found</strong> + <span class="text-muted">(@_currentPage of @_totalPages pages)</span> + } +</p>
43-50: Consider using records for immutable data modelsThe
FoodRecallclass represents data from an external API and should be immutable.Consider this approach:
- private class FoodRecall + private record FoodRecall { - public string Status { get; set; } = default!; - public string City { get; set; } = default!; - public string State { get; set; } = default!; - public string Recalling_Firm { get; set; } = default!; - public string Event_Id { get; set; } = default!; + public string Status { get; init; } = default!; + public string City { get; init; } = default!; + public string State { get; init; } = default!; + public string Recalling_Firm { get; init; } = default!; + public string Event_Id { get; init; } = default!; }
52-63: Add XML documentation for data modelsThe data models lack documentation explaining their purpose and the structure of the FDA API response.
Consider adding XML documentation:
+ /// <summary> + /// Represents the response structure from the FDA food enforcement API. + /// </summary> private class FoodRecallQueryResult { public FoodRecall[] Results { get; set; } = default!; public FoodRecallMeta Meta { get; set; } = default!; + /// <summary> + /// Metadata containing pagination information from the FDA API. + /// </summary> public class FoodRecallMeta { public MetaResults Results { get; set; } = default!;docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/_HeaderContent.razor (2)
1-7: Consider enhancing accessibility and responsiveness.The DataGrid implementation could benefit from the following improvements:
- Add ARIA attributes for better screen reader support
- Consider making the layout responsive instead of fixed for better mobile experience
- Add error handling for empty or null data scenarios
<LumexDataGrid Data="@FilteredUsers" - Layout="@Layout.Fixed" + Layout="@Layout.Auto" Classes="@(new() { Table = "w-full" })" + aria-label="User Information Grid" + EmptyContent="No users found"> <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Name)" /> <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Role)" /> <PropertyColumn Property="@(p => p.Status)" HeaderContent="@HeaderContent" /> </LumexDataGrid>
60-60: Enhance type safety and validation in the User record.Consider improving the User record definition with proper validation and type constraints:
- Add required field validation
- Define string length constraints
- Convert Status to an enum for type safety
-private record User( string Name, string Role, string Status ); +private enum UserStatus +{ + Active, + Inactive, + Pending +} + +private record User +{ + public User(string name, string role, UserStatus status) + { + if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(name)) + throw new ArgumentException("Name is required", nameof(name)); + if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(role)) + throw new ArgumentException("Role is required", nameof(role)); + + Name = name[..Math.Min(name.Length, 100)]; + Role = role[..Math.Min(role.Length, 50)]; + Status = status; + } + + public string Name { get; } + public string Role { get; } + public UserStatus Status { get; } +}docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/Layouts/DocsContentLayout.razor (2)
21-21: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for better accessibility.The sidebar container's styling and positioning look good. The scrollbar class addition and padding adjustments align well with the new sticky header implementation.
Consider adding
role="complementary"andaria-label="Table of contents"to improve accessibility:-<div class="scrollbar hidden fixed z-20 overflow-y-auto top-[4.0625rem] right-[max(0px,calc(50%-40rem))] bottom-0 w-[13rem] pb-10 xl:block"> +<div class="scrollbar hidden fixed z-20 overflow-y-auto top-[4.0625rem] right-[max(0px,calc(50%-40rem))] bottom-0 w-[13rem] pb-10 xl:block" + role="complementary" + aria-label="Table of contents">
31-33: Consider high contrast mode compatibility for the gradient overlay.The gradient implementation provides a nice fade effect, but it might not be visible or could cause readability issues in high contrast mode.
Consider adding a media query for high contrast mode:
-<div class="sticky top-0 pointer-events-none"> - <div class="h-10 bg-gradient-to-b from-background"></div> +<div class="sticky top-0 pointer-events-none"> + <div class="h-10 bg-gradient-to-b from-background [@media(forced-colors:active)]:bg-none [@media(forced-colors:active)]:border-b"></div> </div>This ensures the content remains readable in high contrast mode by falling back to a simple border.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/NavMenu.razor (2)
40-46: Consider extracting name transformation logic.The name transformation logic (
item.Name.Replace("Lumex", "")) is duplicated in both the href and content. Consider extracting this into a helper method for better maintainability.+ private string FormatComponentName(string name) => name.Replace("Lumex", ""); + private void RenderItem(RenderTreeBuilder __builder, NavigationItem item, string categoryName) { - var formattedName = item.Name.Replace("Lumex", "").SplitPascalCase(); + var formattedName = FormatComponentName(item.Name).SplitPascalCase(); if(categoryName is "Components API") { <li> <LumexLink Href="@($"docs/api/{formattedName.ToKebabCase()}")" Match="@NavLinkMatch.Prefix" Class="block border-l pl-4 -ml-px border-transparent text-foreground hover:border-foreground-400 data-[active=true]:text-orange-500 data-[active=true]:border-current"> - @item.Name.Replace("Lumex", "") + @FormatComponentName(item.Name) </LumexLink> </li>
50-54: Optimize the status check condition.The status check condition can be simplified using pattern matching.
var styles = ElementClass.Default("flex items-center gap-2") .Add(ElementClass.Empty() .Add("opacity-disabled") - .Add("pointer-events-none"), when: item.Status.HasValue && item.Status.Value is NavItemStatus.Soon) + .Add("pointer-events-none"), when: item.Status is NavItemStatus.Soon)src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexColumnBase.razor (3)
15-15: Follow C# naming conventions for parametersThe parameter name
__builderuses an unconventional double underscore prefix. Consider using standard C# naming conventions.-protected internal virtual void RenderHeaderCellContent( RenderTreeBuilder __builder ) +protected internal virtual void RenderHeaderCellContent( RenderTreeBuilder builder )
26-32: Consider making icon properties configurableThe icon size and properties are hardcoded. Consider making these configurable through parameters for better flexibility.
+[Parameter] +public string SortIconSize { get; set; } = "16"; + +[Parameter] +public string SortIconName { get; set; } = Icons.Rounded.ChevronLeft; <LumexIcon - Size="@new("16")" - Icon="@Icons.Rounded.ChevronLeft" + Size="@new(SortIconSize)" + Icon="@SortIconName"
57-64: Enhance method documentation with usage exampleThe XML documentation is good but could be more helpful with a usage example.
Add an example to the documentation:
/// <summary> /// Renders the content of a cell for a specified column in the data grid. /// Derived classes must override this method to define how each cell's content /// is rendered based on the <paramref name="item"/>. /// </summary> /// <param name="builder">The current <see cref="RenderTreeBuilder" />.</param> /// <param name="item">The data for the row being rendered.</param> +/// <example> +/// Example implementation in a derived class: +/// <code> +/// protected internal override void RenderCellContent(RenderTreeBuilder builder, Person item) +/// { +/// builder.AddContent(0, item.Name); +/// } +/// </code> +/// </example> protected internal abstract void RenderCellContent( RenderTreeBuilder builder, T item );src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/_CheckboxColumn.razor.cs (1)
17-23: Document why sorting is not supported for checkbox columns.The
SortByproperty throwsNotImplementedExceptionwithout explanation. Consider either:
- Adding a comment explaining why sorting is not supported for checkbox columns, or
- Implementing basic sorting functionality based on checkbox state (checked/unchecked)
/// <inheritdoc /> [ExcludeFromCodeCoverage] +/// <remarks> +/// Sorting is not supported for checkbox columns as it would interfere with the selection state management. +/// </remarks> public override SortBuilder<T>? SortBysrc/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor.cs (1)
Line range hint
307-324: Consider adding logging for debugging purposes.While the error handling is good, consider adding logging (at debug level) when exceptions occur. This would help with troubleshooting in production environments.
} - catch( Exception ex ) when( ex is JSDisconnectedException or OperationCanceledException ) + catch( Exception ex ) when( ex is JSDisconnectedException or OperationCanceledException ) { + Logger.LogDebug(ex, "Expected exception during disposal due to client disconnection"); // The JSRuntime side may routinely be gone already if the reason we're disposing is that // the client disconnected. This is not an error. }docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/DataGrid.razor (3)
136-148: Consider adding performance metrics for virtualization.While the virtualization section correctly warns about row height requirements, it would be helpful to include:
- Recommended row height values
- Performance metrics with and without virtualization
- Maximum recommended number of rows before virtualization becomes necessary
239-239: Remove or implement the commented CustomStyles component.The
CustomStylescomponent is commented out. Either:
- Implement and uncomment it if it's needed
- Remove the commented code if it's not needed
299-309: Document generic type parameters in API components.The array includes generic components like
LumexDataGrid<T>andPropertyColumn<T, P>. Consider:
- Adding comments explaining what T and P represent
- Including examples of typical type parameter usage
Example documentation:
// T: The type of data items in the grid // P: The type of the property being bound tosrc/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor.cs (2)
42-47: Enhance exception message for clarityThe exception message in
OnParametersSetis informative. However, consider providing additional guidance on how to correct the expression ifProperty.Bodyis not aMemberExpression. This can help developers quickly identify and fix the issue.Apply this suggestion to improve the exception message:
throw new InvalidOperationException( - $"{GetType()} requires the property '{nameof( Property.Body )}' to be of type '{nameof( MemberExpression )}' (e.g., 'p => p.SomeProperty')." ); + $"{GetType()} requires the property '{nameof( Property )}' to be a simple property access (e.g., 'p => p.SomeProperty')." );
88-88: Add unit tests for the 'EditColumn' componentUnit tests are essential to ensure the 'EditColumn' component functions correctly, especially given its complexity with expression trees and type handling.
Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for this component or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor.cs (3)
55-55: Fix the typo in variable name 'compiledPropertyExpession'The variable name
compiledPropertyExpessionhas a typo. It should becompiledPropertyExpression.Apply this diff to correct the variable name:
- var compiledPropertyExpession = Property.Compile(); + var compiledPropertyExpression = Property.Compile();
84-91: Consider adding null checks inCellContentmethodThe
CellContentmethod invokes_cellContentFuncwithout checking if it'snull. While it's likely initialized appropriately, adding a null check can prevent potentialNullReferenceException.Apply this diff to add a null check:
- protected string? CellContent( T item ) => - _cellContentFunc?.Invoke( item ); + protected string? CellContent( T item ) => + _cellContentFunc != null ? _cellContentFunc.Invoke( item ) : null;
78-81: Handle cases whereProperty.Bodyis not aMemberExpressionThe current implementation assumes that
Property.Bodyis aMemberExpressionto set theTitle. IfPropertyis a complex expression, this might not be the case, andTitlewill remainnull. Consider adding handling for other expression types or providing a default title.Example adjustment:
if( Title is null ) { if( Property.Body is MemberExpression memberExpression ) { Title = memberExpression.Member.Name; } else { Title = "Value"; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (82)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Enums/NavItemStatus.cs(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Models/Generics.cs(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/NavigationStore.cs(2 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/Types.cs(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/Layouts/DocsContentLayout.razor(2 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/Layouts/DocsLayout.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/NavItemBadge.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/NavMenu.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/LumexUI.Docs.Client.csproj(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/DataGrid.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Colors.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/CustomCells.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/CustomCellsTemplateColumn.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/CustomFormat.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/DisabledItems.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/DynamicColumns.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Editing.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/EmptyContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Hoverable.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Loading.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/LoadingContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/MultipleSelection.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/OnRowClick.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/RemoteDataSource.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Shadows.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/SingleSelection.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Sorting.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/StickyHeader.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Striped.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/ToolbarContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Usage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Virtualization.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/_HeaderContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/_Layout.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/_Radius.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/CustomCells.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/CustomCellsTemplateColumn.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/CustomFormat.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/DisabledItems.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/DynamicColumns.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Editing.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/EmptyContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/HeaderContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Hoverable.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Layout.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Loading.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/LoadingContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/MultipleSelection.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/OnRowClick.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Radius.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/RemoteDataSource.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Shadows.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/SingleSelection.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Sorting.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/StickyHeader.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Striped.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/ToolbarContent.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Usage.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Virtualization.razor(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Program.cs(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs/Program.cs(1 hunks)docs/LumexUI.Docs/Styles/globals.css(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Common/Attributes/CompositionComponentAttribute.cs(2 hunks)src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/Align.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/Layout.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/SortDirection.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Common/Events/DataGridRowClickEventArgs.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexColumnBase.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexColumnBase.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor.cs(4 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/Checkbox/LumexCheckbox.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/Interfaces/IEditableColumn.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/TemplateColumn.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/TemplateColumn.razor.cs(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/_CheckboxColumn.razor(1 hunks)src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/_CheckboxColumn.razor.cs(1 hunks)
⛔ Files not processed due to max files limit (24)
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Core/EventCallbackSubscribable.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Core/EventCallbackSubscriber.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Core/_ColumnsCollectedNotifier.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Data/DataSource.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Data/DataSourceRequest.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Data/DataSourceResult.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Data/SortBuilder.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Data/SortDescriptor.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/DataGridContext.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/DataGridSlots.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/DataGridState.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/LumexDataGrid.razor
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/LumexDataGrid.razor.cs
- src/LumexUI/Extensions/BooleanExtensions.cs
- src/LumexUI/Extensions/TypeExtensions.cs
- src/LumexUI/Infrastructure/Defer.cs
- src/LumexUI/Infrastructure/InternalNavLink.cs
- src/LumexUI/LumexUI.csproj
- src/LumexUI/Styles/Button.cs
- src/LumexUI/Styles/DataGrid.cs
- src/LumexUI/Utilities/Memoizer.cs
- src/LumexUI/_Imports.razor
- src/LumexUI/wwwroot/js/components/data-grid.js
- tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DataGrid/DataGridTests.razor
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Enums/NavItemStatus.cs
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/Layouts/DocsLayout.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/CustomCellsTemplateColumn.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/HeaderContent.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Layout.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Loading.razor
- docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/MultipleSelection.razor
- src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/SortDirection.cs
- src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/Interfaces/IEditableColumn.cs
🔇 Additional comments (87)
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Models/Generics.cs (1)
Line range hint 1-5: Clarify the purpose of these empty class declarations
The current implementation raises several concerns:
- The purpose of these empty classes
TandPis not immediately clear - Single-letter names typically indicate generic type parameters, but these are concrete classes
- Missing XML documentation to explain their usage in the documentation/demo context
Let's check how these classes are used in the codebase:
Consider the following improvements:
- If these are meant to be generic type parameter examples:
-public class T;
-public class P;
+/// <summary>
+/// Represents a generic type parameter used in documentation examples.
+/// </summary>
+/// <typeparam name="T">Type parameter for demonstration purposes</typeparam>
+public class GenericExample<T>;- If these are concrete placeholder classes:
-public class T;
-public class P;
+/// <summary>
+/// Placeholder class used for documentation examples.
+/// </summary>
+public class PlaceholderType;✅ Verification successful
Empty classes T and P are valid type parameter placeholders for documentation
These empty class declarations serve as type parameter placeholders specifically for documentation and API examples, as evidenced by their usage in the DataGrid component documentation where T and P are used in generic type declarations like LumexDataGrid<T> and PropertyColumn<T, P>. The single-letter naming is intentional and follows C# conventions for generic type parameters.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of these classes to understand their purpose
rg -l "class.*[^a-zA-Z]T[^a-zA-Z]" --type cs
rg -l "class.*[^a-zA-Z]P[^a-zA-Z]" --type cs
rg "new .*[^a-zA-Z](T|P)[^a-zA-Z]" --type cs
Length of output: 3959
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how these classes are used in the documentation
rg -A 5 "[^a-zA-Z](T|P)[^a-zA-Z]" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/
Length of output: 5777
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Usage.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive components.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is the correct choice for client-side interactive components like DataGrid.
3-5: Verify referenced components and consider namespace simplification.
- The code snippet "DataGrid.Code.Usage" should have a corresponding implementation file.
- Consider simplifying the full namespace reference using
@usingdirective.
Let's verify the referenced components and available snippets:
✅ Verification successful
Let's verify the code snippet implementation by checking the content of the Usage.razor files:
All referenced components exist and follow consistent patterns
The verification shows that:
- The example component exists at
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Usage.razorwith proper implementation - The code snippet "DataGrid.Code.Usage" is correctly referenced in the PreviewCode component
- The pattern is consistent with other preview pages (e.g., Colors.razor) in the same directory
- The full namespace reference is actually part of a consistent pattern used across preview files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced components and code snippets
# Check for the Usage example component
echo "Checking for Usage example component..."
fd -e razor "Usage.razor" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples"
# Check for the code snippet file
echo "Checking for code snippet file..."
rg -l "DataGrid\.Code\.Usage" "docs"
# Check if there are any other similar preview pages for consistency
echo "Checking other preview pages for consistent structure..."
fd -e razor . "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes"
Length of output: 2693
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of both Usage.razor files
echo "Content of Example Usage.razor:"
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Usage.razor"
echo -e "\nContent of PreviewCode Usage.razor:"
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Usage.razor"
# Check if there's a consistent pattern in other preview files
echo -e "\nChecking pattern in another preview file for comparison:"
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor"
Length of output: 1493
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor (2)
1-2: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive components.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified for this interactive documentation component.
3-5: Verify component and code snippet references.
Let's ensure the referenced components and code snippets exist in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Component references and paths are correctly set up
Both the example component and code snippet reference exist in the codebase:
- Example component:
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Colors.razor - Code snippet reference found in:
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Colors.razor
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced components and code snippets
# Check for the Colors example component
echo "Checking for Colors example component..."
fd -e razor -e cs "Colors\.razor$" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples"
# Check for the code snippet definition
echo "Checking for DataGrid.Code.Colors snippet..."
rg -l "DataGrid\.Code\.Colors" docs/
Length of output: 475
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Editing.razor (2)
1-2: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive components.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified for this preview component, enabling client-side interactivity which is essential for demonstrating DataGrid editing features.
3-5: LGTM! Well-structured preview code implementation.
The implementation follows best practices:
- Uses a consistent naming pattern for the code snippet key
- Properly references the example component using fully qualified name
- Maintains clean component hierarchy and consistent indentation
Let's verify the existence of the referenced example component and snippet:
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Radius.razor (1)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive components.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified, enabling full interactivity for the DataGrid demonstration.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Shadows.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive components.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is the correct choice for DataGrid components that require client-side interactivity.
3-5: Verify the code snippet configuration and consider path simplification.
A few points to consider:
- The
name: nullparameter seems unusual. Should this have a meaningful name? - We should verify that the
"DataGrid.Code.Shadows"snippet exists in the codebase.
Additionally, consider adding a @using directive for the Examples namespace to simplify the component reference:
+@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples
<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.Shadows")">
- <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples.Shadows />
+ <Shadows />
</PreviewCode>✅ Verification successful
The code configuration follows the project's conventions
Based on the extensive search results:
- The
name: nullparameter is consistently used across all PreviewCode components in the project (100+ instances), indicating this is the intended pattern. - The fully qualified component path is also common, as we found no evidence of using directives for the Examples namespace in DataGrid preview files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the DataGrid.Code.Shadows snippet definition
# and any using directives for the Examples namespace
# Look for the snippet definition
rg -l "DataGrid\.Code\.Shadows"
# Check if other preview pages use shorter namespace imports
rg "using.*DataGrid\.Examples" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/"
Length of output: 209
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the file to see if it contains the snippet definition
rg -A 10 "DataGrid\.Code\.Shadows" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Shadows.razor"
# Check if there's a code snippets file or similar that might contain the snippet definition
fd -e cs -e razor "Shadows" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client
# Check if other PreviewCode usages have name parameter set
rg "<PreviewCode.*Code=\"@new\(.*name:" docs/
Length of output: 21182
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the code snippets file to verify if the snippet exists
fd -e cs "Code.Shadows" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client
# Let's also check if there's a common pattern for using directives in other DataGrid preview files
rg "^@using.*DataGrid\.Examples" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/"
Length of output: 148
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Sorting.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Correct render mode for interactive documentation.
The @rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly directive is appropriately used here to enable client-side interactivity for the sorting demonstration.
3-5: Consider simplifying the component reference and verify the code snippet.
The component structure is correct, but consider these improvements:
- The fully qualified component path could be simplified using a
@usingdirective - Ensure the "DataGrid.Code.Sorting" snippet exists in the codebase
+@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples
<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.Sorting")">
- <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples.Sorting />
+ <Sorting />
</PreviewCode>Let's verify the code snippet reference:
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Striped.razor (1)
1-1: Verify the necessity of InteractiveWebAssembly render mode.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is used, which is appropriate if the DataGrid example requires client-side interactivity. However, let's verify if this level of interactivity is needed for this specific example.
✅ Verification successful
InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly applied
The DataGrid component requires client-side interactivity as evidenced by:
- All DataGrid example pages consistently use
@rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly - The DataGrid component implementation shows multiple interactive features:
- Row selection and click handling
- Sorting functionality
- Cell editing capabilities
- Virtualization support
- Event handling for outside clicks
- Dynamic data loading
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is necessary for this component to function properly with its interactive features.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other preview pages use the same render mode and if the Striped example has interactive features
# Check render mode usage in other preview pages
echo "Checking render mode usage in other preview pages:"
rg -l "@rendermode\s+InteractiveWebAssembly" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/"
# Check if Striped example has interactive features
echo "Checking Striped example for interactive features:"
rg -A 10 "public\s+class\s+Striped" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/"
Length of output: 2486
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the Striped example to understand if it needs interactivity
echo "Checking content of Striped.razor example:"
rg -l "Striped\.razor$" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/" | xargs cat
# Also check if DataGrid component itself has interactive features that would require client-side rendering
echo "Checking DataGrid component features:"
rg -l "DataGrid\.razor$" . | xargs cat
Length of output: 319
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using fd to find and read the files
echo "Checking Striped example content:"
fd "Striped.razor$" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/ --exec cat {}
# Check if DataGrid has interactive features by looking for event handlers and state management
echo "Checking DataGrid component for interactive features:"
fd "DataGrid.razor$" . --exec cat {}
# Check if there's any documentation about render modes
echo "Checking documentation about render modes:"
rg -i "rendermode|interactive" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/
Length of output: 22158
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Hoverable.razor (2)
1-2: LGTM! Render mode is appropriate for interactive components.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified for client-side interactivity.
3-5: Verify the referenced code snippet and example component.
The component references:
- A code snippet with ID "DataGrid.Code.Hoverable"
- An example component at
LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples.Hoverable
Also, consider documenting why the name parameter is set to null in the Code tuple.
Let's verify these references exist:
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/OnRowClick.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive components.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified for this component, enabling client-side interactivity which is essential for demonstrating DataGrid click events.
3-5: Verify the PreviewCode component configuration and example.
The component structure looks good, but let's verify:
- The code snippet reference "DataGrid.Code.OnRowClick" exists
- The example component is properly implemented
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/CustomCells.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive documentation.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is well-suited for this documentation component as it enables client-side interactivity, which is essential for demonstrating DataGrid features.
3-5: Verify the existence of referenced components and snippets.
Please ensure that:
- The "DataGrid.Code.CustomCells" snippet exists and contains the appropriate code
- The CustomCells example component exists in the specified namespace
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/CustomFormat.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive components.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is well-suited for the DataGrid component which requires client-side interactivity.
3-5: Verify the referenced components and code snippets.
Let's ensure that all referenced resources exist in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
All referenced components and code snippets are present
The verification confirms:
- CustomFormat example component exists at
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/CustomFormat.razor - The code snippet reference "DataGrid.Code.CustomFormat" is defined in the same file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced components and code snippets
# Check for the CustomFormat component
echo "Checking for CustomFormat component..."
fd "CustomFormat.razor" --type f
# Check for the code snippet definition
echo "Checking for DataGrid.Code.CustomFormat snippet..."
rg -l "DataGrid\.Code\.CustomFormat"
Length of output: 514
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/EmptyContent.razor (2)
1-1: Verify WebAssembly runtime availability in the hosting environment.
The @rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly directive indicates this component requires WebAssembly support. Ensure the hosting environment is properly configured to support WebAssembly execution.
✅ Verification successful
WebAssembly configuration is properly set up for the component
The codebase shows proper WebAssembly configuration:
- Project uses
Microsoft.NET.Sdk.BlazorWebAssemblySDK - WebAssembly hosting is configured with
WebAssemblyHostBuilder - Interactive WebAssembly components and render mode are properly registered
- Debugging support is enabled via
UseWebAssemblyDebugging
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the project is configured for WebAssembly
fd -e csproj | xargs cat | grep -i "BlazorWebAssembly"
# Verify the presence of WebAssembly configuration in Program.cs or similar startup files
fd -g "*Program.cs" | xargs cat | grep -i "WebAssembly"
Length of output: 414
3-5: Verify the code snippet reference exists.
The component references a code snippet "DataGrid.Code.EmptyContent". Let's ensure this snippet exists in the codebase.
Additionally, consider adding XML documentation to the example component to provide more context about its purpose and usage.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/StickyHeader.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode chosen.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is well-suited for a DataGrid component that requires client-side interactivity.
3-5: Verify the example component and consider improving documentation.
A few points to consider:
- The null name parameter might need attention
- Let's verify the example component exists
Consider adding XML documentation comments above the code to explain:
- The purpose of this preview
- Expected behavior of the sticky header
- Any configuration options demonstrated
@rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly
+@*
+ * Demonstrates the DataGrid's sticky header functionality
+ * The header remains fixed while scrolling through data
+ *@
<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.StickyHeader")">
<LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples.StickyHeader />
</PreviewCode>✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the name: null parameter by checking the PreviewCode component definition.
Let me check the PreviewCode component definition to understand the name parameter.
Let me check the CodeBlock type definition to understand its constructor parameters.
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response:
The code is correct and follows the established pattern.
The null name parameter in new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.StickyHeader") is valid because:
- The
CodeBlockclass is defined with an optionalnameparameter:public class CodeBlock(string? name, string snippet) - This pattern is consistently used across all documentation preview codes in the codebase
- Both the example component and code snippet exist in the correct locations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the StickyHeader example component
fd "StickyHeader.razor" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples"
# Check if the DataGrid.Code.StickyHeader snippet exists in code snippets
rg -l "DataGrid\.Code\.StickyHeader" docs/
Length of output: 290
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PreviewCode component definition and usage
ast-grep --pattern 'class PreviewCode {
$$$
}'
# Search for other PreviewCode usages to compare
rg -B1 -A1 '<PreviewCode' docs/
Length of output: 52386
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find PreviewCode component definition
fd "PreviewCode.razor" docs/
# Check the content of the PreviewCode component
rg -A 10 "class PreviewCode" docs/
Length of output: 1252
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for CodeBlock type definition
rg -A 10 "class CodeBlock" docs/
# Search for CodeBlock constructor usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'new($_, $_)'
Length of output: 6542
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/DynamicColumns.razor (1)
1-5: LGTM! Well-structured documentation component.
The component is properly configured for WebAssembly rendering and follows documentation best practices with a clean, focused implementation.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/LoadingContent.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive components.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified for this component, enabling client-side interactivity which is essential for DataGrid demonstrations.
3-5: Verify the LoadingContent code snippet existence.
The component structure looks good, but we should verify that the referenced code snippet "DataGrid.Code.LoadingContent" exists in the codebase.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/ToolbarContent.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive documentation.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified for client-side interactivity.
3-3: Verify the existence of the code snippet.
Ensure that the "DataGrid.Code.ToolbarContent" snippet exists in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
The code snippet exists and is properly referenced
The verification shows that both the PreviewCode component and its referenced example component exist in the codebase. The example component contains a complete implementation of a DataGrid with toolbar content, demonstrating search functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the ToolbarContent snippet definition
rg -l "DataGrid\.Code\.ToolbarContent" --type-add 'razor:*.razor' --type razor
Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the actual snippet content in the codebase
rg "DataGrid\.Code\.ToolbarContent" -A 10 -B 10
Length of output: 682
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if the example component exists
rg -l "LumexUI\.Docs\.Client\.Pages\.Components\.DataGrid\.Examples\.ToolbarContent" --type-add 'razor:*.razor' --type razor
# Also search for any code snippet definitions
rg "DataGrid\.Code\.ToolbarContent.*=.*" -A 5
Length of output: 259
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the Examples/ToolbarContent.razor file
fd -e razor ToolbarContent.razor -x cat {}
Length of output: 1829
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/Virtualization.razor (2)
1-1: Verify WebAssembly configuration for interactive features.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is appropriate for interactive documentation, but ensure the project is properly configured for WebAssembly support.
✅ Verification successful
WebAssembly configuration is properly set up for interactive features
The project is correctly configured for WebAssembly support with:
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssemblypackage in LumexUI.Docs.Client.csproj- WebAssembly host builder initialization in Program.cs
- Required WebAssembly namespaces in _Imports.razor
- Proper script references including
blazor.web.jsin App.razor
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify WebAssembly configuration in the project
# Check for WebAssembly configuration in project files
rg -l "InteractiveWebAssembly" --type xml
rg -l "Microsoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly" --type xml
# Check for WebAssembly Program configuration
fd "Program.cs" | xargs rg "WebAssemblyHostBuilder"
Length of output: 548
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for project file and its configuration
fd -e csproj | xargs cat
# Check for _Imports.razor to verify WebAssembly namespace imports
fd "_Imports.razor" | xargs cat
# Check for App.razor and other key components
fd "App.razor" | xargs cat
Length of output: 10581
3-5: Consider simplifying the namespace reference.
The code structure is correct, but the fully qualified namespace LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples.Virtualization could be simplified using a @using directive at the top of the file or in _Imports.razor.
+@using LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples
<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.Virtualization")">
- <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples.Virtualization />
+ <Virtualization />
</PreviewCode>Additionally, verify that the referenced code snippet exists in the documentation system.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/SingleSelection.razor (2)
1-1: LGTM! Appropriate render mode for interactive documentation.
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is correctly specified, enabling client-side interactivity which is essential for demonstrating DataGrid features.
3-5: Verify the code snippet and component references.
The implementation looks correct, but we should verify:
- The existence of the "DataGrid.Code.SingleSelection" snippet
- The correct registration of the SingleSelection example component
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/RemoteDataSource.razor (2)
1-1: Verify render mode consistency across preview components
The InteractiveWebAssembly render mode is appropriate for this interactive preview component.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the actual render mode used in these files to ensure consistency.
Render mode is consistent with all preview components
The @rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly directive is consistently used across all DataGrid preview components, which is the correct approach for these interactive demo components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other preview components use the same render mode
# Expect: Consistent usage of @rendermode InteractiveWebAssembly
# Search for render mode directives in preview components
rg -l '@rendermode' docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/
Length of output: 2138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual render mode directive in preview components
rg '@rendermode' docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/PreviewCodes/
Length of output: 3010
3-5: Verify code snippet reference and consider naming
A few points to verify:
- The
name: nullparameter seems unnecessary since it's explicitly set to null - Need to ensure the "DataGrid.Code.RemoteDataSource" snippet exists
Consider simplifying the Code property:
-<PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.RemoteDataSource")">
+<PreviewCode Code="@("DataGrid.Code.RemoteDataSource")">src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/TemplateColumn.razor (1)
1-3: LGTM! Component structure follows best practices.
The component is properly structured with correct namespace, inheritance, and generic type parameter declaration.
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor (1)
1-23: Verify component integration with DataGrid
While the component implementation looks sound, we should verify its integration with the parent DataGrid component and other column types.
Let's check the component's usage and relationship with other parts:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different commands to gather more information about the component integration.
Let me check the DataGrid implementation and its relationship with columns to complete the verification.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
PropertyColumn is well-integrated with DataGrid component
The verification shows that PropertyColumn is properly integrated within the DataGrid ecosystem:
- It's extensively used in tests demonstrating various scenarios (sorting, selection, formatting)
- It serves as a base for EditColumn, showing proper inheritance patterns
- It's widely used across example implementations in documentation
- It correctly implements the column contract through LumexColumnBase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for DataGrid component usage patterns
echo "Checking DataGrid usage patterns..."
rg -l "PropertyColumn[\s\n]*<" --type razor
# Check for other column implementations
echo "Checking other column implementations..."
fd -e razor -p "*/Columns/*.razor"
# Check for interface implementations
echo "Checking for related interfaces..."
rg "interface.*Column" --type cs
Length of output: 801
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for DataGrid component usage patterns with proper extension
echo "Checking DataGrid usage patterns..."
rg -l "PropertyColumn"
# Check for other column implementations
echo "Checking column implementations..."
fd "Column.razor"
# Check base class implementation
echo "Checking LumexColumnBase implementation..."
rg -A 10 "class LumexColumnBase"
# Check DataGrid component implementation
echo "Checking DataGrid component..."
fd "DataGrid.razor"
Length of output: 4560
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check DataGrid implementation for column handling
echo "Checking DataGrid implementation..."
rg -A 10 "LumexColumnBase" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/LumexDataGrid.razor
# Check how PropertyColumn is used in tests
echo "Checking PropertyColumn usage in tests..."
rg -A 10 "PropertyColumn" tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DataGrid/DataGridTests.razor
# Check EditColumn implementation as it uses PropertyColumn
echo "Checking EditColumn implementation..."
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor.cs
Length of output: 13600
src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/Align.cs (1)
13-13: LGTM! The enum changes are well-structured.
The changes follow good practices:
- Logical ordering of alignment options (Start -> Center -> End)
- Consistent documentation style
- Clear and descriptive XML comments
Also applies to: 18-23
docs/LumexUI.Docs/Styles/globals.css (1)
26-28: LGTM! Well-structured scrollbar utility class.
The new .scrollbar utility class is well-organized and uses Tailwind's scrollbar plugin effectively. The use of foreground colors with different opacities ensures proper contrast and dark mode compatibility.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Editing.razor (1)
1-17: Verify EditColumn component implementation
Let's ensure the EditColumn component exists and supports the required functionality.
✅ Verification successful
EditColumn component is properly integrated and supported
The verification shows that the EditColumn component is well-integrated into the system:
- Component is properly defined in
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor.cs - Implements
IEditableColumninterface and extendsPropertyColumn<T, P> - Has comprehensive test coverage in
DataGridTests.razor - Editing functionality is supported through
DataGridStateclass with proper edit state management - Documentation exists explaining its purpose for in-cell editing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for EditColumn component definition
echo "Searching for EditColumn component definition..."
rg -t razor -t cs "public class EditColumn"
# Search for edit-related event handlers
echo "Searching for edit-related event handlers..."
rg -t razor -t cs "OnEdit|OnSave|OnCancel" --type-add 'razor:*.razor'
Length of output: 353
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for EditColumn component definition and usage
echo "Searching for EditColumn component and related files..."
fd -e razor -e cs | xargs rg "EditColumn"
# Search for edit-related event handlers with broader context
echo "Searching for edit-related event handlers..."
fd -e razor -e cs | xargs rg -A 3 "(OnEdit|OnSave|OnCancel|Edit.*Column)"
Length of output: 11638
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Usage.razor (1)
1-5: Verify component implementations
Let's verify that the required components and their features exist in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Components and features verified successfully
Both LumexDataGrid and PropertyColumn components exist and are properly implemented:
LumexDataGrid<T>supports theDataparameter of typeIQueryable<T>PropertyColumn<T, P>supports the requiredPropertyparameter of typeExpression<Func<T, P>>- The components are properly integrated with full template support
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify LumexDataGrid and PropertyColumn implementations
# Check for LumexDataGrid component
echo "Checking LumexDataGrid component..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class LumexDataGrid<TItem> $$$'
# Check for PropertyColumn component
echo "Checking PropertyColumn component..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class PropertyColumn<TItem, TValue> $$$'
# Check for sorting support
echo "Checking sorting implementation..."
rg -A 5 "Sortable\s*{.*get;.*set;}" --type cs
Length of output: 527
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the components
# Search for LumexDataGrid files
echo "Searching for LumexDataGrid files..."
fd "LumexDataGrid" --type f
# Search for PropertyColumn files
echo "Searching for PropertyColumn files..."
fd "PropertyColumn" --type f
# Look for class definitions with more flexible patterns
echo "Checking component implementations..."
rg "class (LumexDataGrid|PropertyColumn)" --type cs -A 5
# Check for Data parameter in LumexDataGrid
echo "Checking Data parameter..."
rg "Parameter.*Data" --type cs -A 2
Length of output: 4002
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the Property parameter in PropertyColumn and check the component templates
# Check Property parameter in PropertyColumn
echo "Checking Property parameter..."
rg "Property.*Parameter" --type cs -A 2 src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor.cs
# Look at the component templates
echo "Checking LumexDataGrid template..."
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/LumexDataGrid.razor
echo "Checking PropertyColumn template..."
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor
Length of output: 7770
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Final check for Property parameter and expression support
# Check for Property parameter in PropertyColumn
echo "Checking Property parameter definition..."
rg "Property.*get;.*set;" --type cs src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor.cs
# Check for expression support
echo "Checking expression support..."
rg "Expression.*Property" -B 2 -A 2 --type cs src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor.cs
Length of output: 1363
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Loading.razor (1)
1-17: Verify component dependencies
Let's verify that all required components are properly defined in the system.
✅ Verification successful
Components are properly integrated and working as expected
The verification shows that both components are properly defined and integrated:
LumexDataGridis a fully implemented component with support for loading states, virtualization, and column managementPropertyColumnis correctly implemented as a column type for the data grid- The Loading example is one of many examples (26 different examples found) demonstrating various features of the component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that LumexDataGrid and PropertyColumn components exist
# Check for LumexDataGrid component definition
echo "Checking for LumexDataGrid component..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class LumexDataGrid$$$'
# Check for PropertyColumn component definition
echo "Checking for PropertyColumn component..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class PropertyColumn$$$'
# Check for other examples using these components
echo "Checking for other usage examples..."
rg -l "LumexDataGrid|PropertyColumn" --type razor
Length of output: 28877
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the components
# Check for LumexDataGrid component definition with a more specific pattern
echo "Checking for LumexDataGrid component..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class LumexDataGrid<$_> : LumexComponentBase$$$'
# Check for PropertyColumn component definition with a more specific pattern
echo "Checking for PropertyColumn component..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class PropertyColumn<$_, $_> : LumexColumnBase$$$'
# Search for files containing these components using ripgrep with file extension
echo "Checking for usage examples..."
rg -l "LumexDataGrid|PropertyColumn" --type-add 'razor:*.razor' --type razor
Length of output: 2613
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual component implementations
# Check LumexDataGrid implementation
echo "=== LumexDataGrid Implementation ==="
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/LumexDataGrid.razor
# Check PropertyColumn implementation
echo -e "\n=== PropertyColumn Implementation ==="
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor
# Check if the Loading example is one of many examples
echo -e "\n=== Loading Example Context ==="
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Loading.razor
Length of output: 8259
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/_Layout.razor (1)
1-17: Verify consistent DataGrid usage across examples.
As this is a documentation example, let's ensure consistent usage patterns across other example files.
✅ Verification successful
DataGrid examples show consistent usage patterns
The verification shows consistent usage of PropertyColumn across all DataGrid examples with proper variations demonstrating different features:
- Basic usage with Name/Role/Status columns
- Advanced scenarios like sorting, virtualization, and custom formatting
- Various customization examples (HeaderContent, CustomCells, etc.)
- Proper demonstration of features like selection, loading states, and dynamic columns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent DataGrid usage patterns across example files
# Find all DataGrid example files
echo "Searching for other DataGrid examples..."
fd -e razor -e cs "DataGrid" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/
# Check for consistent PropertyColumn usage
echo "Checking PropertyColumn usage patterns..."
rg -A 2 "PropertyColumn" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/
Length of output: 14835
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Sorting.razor (1)
1-17: Verify documentation standards for example components.
As this is a demo component, we should ensure it follows the documentation standards established in other example components.
✅ Verification successful
Example follows established documentation patterns
Looking at other example components like Usage.razor and CustomCells.razor, we can see that they follow the same pattern: simple, focused examples without additional documentation comments. The current Sorting.razor example aligns with this established pattern in the documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other example components have documentation comments
rg -l '@page|@using' docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/
Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all files in the Examples directory to understand the structure
fd . docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/
# Check content of example files for documentation patterns
rg -B 5 "LumexDataGrid" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/ --type razor
Length of output: 2152
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of a few example files to understand documentation patterns
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Usage.razor
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/CustomCells.razor
Length of output: 1899
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/TemplateColumn.razor.cs (2)
9-18: Verify template rendering implementation
The class is marked as partial but doesn't show the implementation of RenderCellContent. Please ensure that:
- The corresponding .razor file exists and implements the rendering logic
- Null checks are in place for
ChildContent - The template rendering is properly handled in the component lifecycle
✅ Verification successful
Template rendering implementation is properly handled
The corresponding .razor file exists and implements the rendering logic correctly:
RenderCellContentis implemented with proper null check forChildContent- The template is rendered using the standard Blazor syntax
@ChildContent(item) - Base component's render tree is properly built using
base.BuildRenderTree
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the corresponding .razor file and its implementation
fd "TemplateColumn.razor$" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns -x cat {}
# Look for RenderCellContent implementation in other partial files
rg -A 5 "RenderCellContent.*TemplateColumn" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns
Length of output: 506
9-18: Verify DataGrid integration points
Please ensure that:
- The base class
LumexColumnBase<T>properly supports template columns - The sorting functionality is properly implemented when
SortByis provided - The component works correctly with the DataGrid's virtualization if implemented
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the base class and sorting implementation.
Let me check the base class implementation and column rendering to complete the verification.
Based on the comprehensive verification results, I can now provide the final response:
Template column integration is properly implemented
The verification confirms that:
- The
TemplateColumn<T>correctly inherits fromLumexColumnBase<T>and implements all required functionality - Sorting is properly supported through the
SortByparameter, which integrates with the DataGrid's sorting mechanism viaSortBuilder<T> - The component works seamlessly with virtualization as the DataGrid handles virtualization at the grid level, independent of column implementations
- The column properly implements
RenderCellContentto handle template rendering - Sorting integration is handled through the DataGrid's
SortByColumnAsyncmethod - Virtualization is managed by the DataGrid component itself through the
Virtualizeparameter
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the base class implementation
rg -A 10 "class LumexColumnBase" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid
# Look for sorting implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
SortBy
$$$
}'
# Check for virtualization support
rg -A 5 "virtualization|virtual.*scroll" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid
Length of output: 2119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the base class implementation and its relationship with columns
rg -A 15 "abstract.*class.*LumexColumnBase" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid
# Look for sorting implementation in DataGrid
rg -A 10 "SortBy|Sort.*Builder" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid
# Check how template columns are rendered
ast-grep --pattern 'class LumexDataGrid$_ {
$$$
RenderFragment
$$$
}'
Length of output: 18934
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the base class implementation
rg -A 20 "abstract.*class.*LumexColumnBase|class.*LumexColumnBase" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid
# Check how columns are rendered in the grid
rg -A 10 "RenderHeaderCellContent|RenderCellContent" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid
Length of output: 11976
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/DisabledItems.razor (1)
1-2: Verify LumexDataGrid's disabled items implementation.
Let's ensure that the LumexDataGrid component properly implements the disabled items feature.
✅ Verification successful
The DisabledItems feature is properly implemented in LumexDataGrid
The verification shows that the DisabledItems feature is fully implemented and working as expected in the LumexDataGrid component:
- The property is properly defined in
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/LumexDataGrid.razor.cs:[Parameter] public ICollection<T> DisabledItems { get; set; } = new HashSet<T>();
- The feature is integrated in the checkbox column (
_CheckboxColumn.razor) to disable row selection - The implementation is tested in
tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DataGrid/DataGridTests.razor - Example usage and documentation are provided in
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/DisabledItems.razor
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DisabledItems property definition in LumexDataGrid
ast-grep --pattern 'class LumexDataGrid {
$$$
public $_? DisabledItems {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Look for any documentation or tests related to disabled items
rg -l "DisabledItems" --type razor --type cs
Length of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DisabledItems property in any class
ast-grep --pattern 'public $_? DisabledItems { $$ }'
# Search for DisabledItems usage in files
rg "DisabledItems"
# List all files with .razor extension to confirm file type
fd -e razor
Length of output: 28800
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/Types.cs (1)
31-31: Verify enum dependency and migration impact.
The code references NavItemStatus enum which should be defined in the Enums namespace. This change also represents a breaking change from the previous boolean locked property.
Let's verify the enum definition and identify affected consumers:
Also applies to: 34-34
✅ Verification successful
NavItemStatus enum is properly defined and used, no migration issues found
The verification shows that:
NavItemStatusenum is properly defined indocs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Enums/NavItemStatus.cswith valuesSoonandPreview- The enum is correctly used in the new
NavigationItemconstructor and its consumers - No references to the old
Lockedproperty were found - The change is properly integrated across the codebase:
- Used in
NavigationStore.csfor marking components as "Soon" or "Preview" - Handled in
NavMenu.razorfor UI styling - Properly displayed via
NavItemBadge.razorwith specific styling per status
- Used in
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify NavItemStatus enum definition and identify affected code
# Check if NavItemStatus enum exists
echo "Checking NavItemStatus enum definition..."
ast-grep --pattern 'enum NavItemStatus { $$$ }'
# Find all usages of NavigationItem constructor
echo "Finding NavigationItem constructor usages..."
rg -A 2 'new NavigationItem\('
# Find any remaining references to the old 'Locked' property
echo "Checking for outdated 'Locked' property usage..."
rg '\.Locked\b'
Length of output: 405
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the enum and its usages
# Search for NavItemStatus definition with broader pattern
echo "Searching for NavItemStatus definition..."
rg -B 2 -A 2 "NavItemStatus"
# Search for files containing NavigationItem to understand the context
echo "Searching files containing NavigationItem..."
fd -e cs | xargs rg "NavigationItem" -C 3
# Look for any enum definitions in the Common/Navigation directory
echo "Checking enums in Navigation directory..."
fd -e cs -p "Common/Navigation" | xargs cat
Length of output: 11188
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/NavItemBadge.razor (2)
10-11: LGTM!
The parameter declaration follows best practices with proper nullable reference type usage.
25-29: Add documentation and verify enum coverage
Consider adding documentation to explain the visual appearance of each variant. Also, we should verify that all possible enum values are covered in the variants dictionary.
Add XML documentation to explain the visual styles:
private static readonly Dictionary<NavItemStatus, string> _variants = new()
{
+ // Light gray background with darker border and text
[NavItemStatus.Soon] = "bg-foreground-100 ring-foreground-300 text-foreground-600",
+ // Light indigo background with matching border and text
[NavItemStatus.Preview] = "bg-indigo-50 ring-indigo-200 text-indigo-500"
};✅ Verification successful
Dictionary covers all enum values
The NavItemStatus enum only contains two values: Soon and Preview, and both are properly mapped in the variants dictionary. The original suggestion for documentation comments is still valid for better code clarity.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all NavItemStatus enum values are covered in the variants dictionary
# Find and analyze the NavItemStatus enum definition
ast-grep --pattern 'enum NavItemStatus {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the enum definition using ripgrep
rg "enum NavItemStatus" -A 5
Length of output: 413
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/RemoteDataSource.razor (1)
1-26: Enhance the demo to showcase more DataGrid features.
As a documentation example, this component should demonstrate more features of the DataGrid:
- Sorting capabilities
- Column customization
- Row selection
- Pagination controls
Let's verify if other examples cover these features:
src/LumexUI/Common/Attributes/CompositionComponentAttribute.cs (2)
Line range hint 3-30: Implementation looks good!
The class is well-designed with:
- Clear XML documentation
- Proper attribute usage restrictions
- Immutable design
- Single responsibility
1-1: Consider if code coverage exclusion is necessary
While it's common to exclude attribute classes from code coverage as they typically contain only simple property assignments, we should verify if this aligns with the project's testing strategy. The attribute is used for component composition, which could be important for integration tests.
Let's check if this follows a consistent pattern in the codebase:
Also applies to: 12-12
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage of ExcludeFromCodeCoverage in the codebase to better understand the established patterns.
ExcludeFromCodeCoverage attribute is appropriately used
The usage of ExcludeFromCodeCoverage on CompositionComponentAttribute aligns with the established patterns in the codebase. The attribute is consistently applied to:
- Other attribute classes
- Style-related classes and structs
- Event argument classes (including DataGridRowClickEventArgs)
- Model classes and utility classes with simple property assignments
This is a justified exclusion as attribute classes typically contain minimal logic and are primarily used for metadata purposes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage pattern of ExcludeFromCodeCoverage in attribute classes
# and related components
# Check for other attribute classes with ExcludeFromCodeCoverage
echo "Checking other attribute classes:"
rg -l "class.*Attribute.*:.*Attribute" | xargs rg "ExcludeFromCodeCoverage"
# Check DataGridRowClickEventArgs mentioned in summary
echo -e "\nChecking DataGridRowClickEventArgs:"
rg -A 5 "class DataGridRowClickEventArgs"
Length of output: 882
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check overall usage pattern of ExcludeFromCodeCoverage
echo "Checking ExcludeFromCodeCoverage usage patterns:"
rg -B 2 -A 1 "ExcludeFromCodeCoverage"
# Check if there are any test files covering attributes
echo -e "\nChecking for attribute tests:"
fd -e cs | rg -l "Test" | xargs rg "Attribute"
Length of output: 15192
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/_CheckboxColumn.razor (1)
2-2: Verify base class implementation
Let's verify that the component properly implements all required members from LumexColumnBase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response since I have found the base class implementations and other column components for comparison.
Base class implementation is correctly followed
The _CheckboxColumn<T> component properly implements all required members from LumexColumnBase<T>:
- Correctly overrides
RenderCellContentandRenderHeaderCellContentmethods - Properly implements the
SortByproperty with appropriate exceptions for checkbox columns - Integrates with the DataGrid's selection system through
SelectedItems,SelectionMode, andDisabledItems - Follows the same pattern as other column types (PropertyColumn, TemplateColumn, EditColumn)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the base class definition and any abstract members
ast-grep --pattern 'abstract class LumexColumnBase<$_> {
$$$
}'
# Search for other column implementations for comparison
fd -e razor -e cs . | grep -i "column\.razor\|column\.cs" | xargs cat
Length of output: 15584
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/CustomCellsTemplateColumn.razor (1)
1-26: Verify component naming and documentation conventions.
Let's ensure this example follows the established patterns in other documentation pages.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the output, I can see that the file CustomCellsTemplateColumn.razor follows the established naming convention in the documentation. It's located in both the Examples and PreviewCodes directories, which is consistent with other DataGrid examples. The component name accurately describes its purpose and follows the same pattern as other example components like CustomCells.razor, DynamicColumns.razor, etc.
Component follows documentation conventions correctly
The file structure and naming align perfectly with other DataGrid examples in the documentation, maintaining consistency across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check naming patterns and structure in other example components
# Check for consistent naming patterns in example components
fd -e razor . docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/ -x echo "Filename: {}"
# Check for other DataGrid examples structure
rg -l "LumexDataGrid" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/
Length of output: 27297
src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/Layout.cs (3)
7-13: Well-documented enum with clear purpose and references
The documentation is thorough and follows best practices:
- Clear summary for the enum and each member
- Proper XML documentation format
- External references to MDN for additional context
- Consistent documentation style across members
Also applies to: 15-21, 23-29
1-4: Verify the copyright year and license reference
The copyright notice and license reference look good, but let's verify the repository URL is correct and accessible.
✅ Verification successful
License and copyright information is correctly configured
The verification confirms:
- License file exists in the repository root
- It's an MIT license as referenced in the header
- The repository URL in the header is valid and accessible
- The copyright year (2024) is current
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the license file exists at the specified path and contains MIT license
# Expected: License file exists and contains MIT license text
# Check if the license file exists and contains MIT license text
if [[ -f "LICENSE" ]]; then
echo "License file exists"
grep -i "MIT" LICENSE
else
echo "License file not found"
fi
# Verify the repository URL is accessible
gh repo view LumexUI/lumexui --json url
Length of output: 408
13-30: Consider integration patterns with DataGrid component
The enum design is clean and follows the Single Responsibility Principle. Since this enum will be used with the DataGrid component, consider the following architectural recommendations:
- Ensure the enum values align with the DataGrid's layout requirements
- Consider adding XML examples showing usage with DataGrid
- Document any performance implications of Auto vs Fixed layouts with large datasets
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the DataGrid integration further to make a conclusive verification.
Let me try one final verification to check the DataGrid's layout property and its documentation.
Layout enum is correctly integrated with DataGrid component
Based on the verification results, the Layout enum is well-integrated with the DataGrid component:
- It's properly used in the DataGrid styles with both Auto and Fixed options mapping to corresponding CSS classes (
table-autoandtable-fixed) - The DataGrid component has Auto layout as the default value, which is documented
- There's existing performance consideration documentation regarding large datasets
- The implementation follows table-layout CSS property standards as referenced in the enum documentation
The architectural recommendations in the review comment are already addressed in the current implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for DataGrid component integration
# Expected: Find references to Layout enum in DataGrid component
# Search for DataGrid usage of Layout enum
rg -t cs "Layout\." --context 3
# Look for potential test files
fd -e cs "DataGrid.*Tests"
Length of output: 6377
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check DataGrid component implementation and documentation
rg -t cs "class LumexDataGrid" -A 10
rg -t cs "Layout\s+[A-Za-z_]+\s*{.*?get;.*?set;" --multiline
# Look for any performance-related tests or documentation
fd -e cs -e md "Performance|Benchmark"
Length of output: 1362
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Layout property in DataGrid and its documentation
rg -t cs "Layout\s+\w+\s*{?\s*get;" -A 3 "src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid"
# Check for any performance documentation or comments
rg -t cs "performance|dataset" -i "src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid"
# Look for any usage examples
fd -e razor "DataGrid.*Example"
Length of output: 584
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/DynamicColumns.razor (1)
1-26: Verify completeness of the DataGrid demonstration.
As this is a demo component, consider if it adequately demonstrates key DataGrid features to users. Some aspects to verify:
- Are there enough rows to demonstrate scrolling behavior?
- Does it show common use cases for dynamic columns?
- Should it include examples of data filtering?
✅ Verification successful
The DynamicColumns example is appropriately focused and complete
Based on the documentation and examples found, the DynamicColumns example adequately demonstrates its specific feature without overlap. The DataGrid documentation shows that each example is purposefully focused on demonstrating a single feature, and this example clearly shows how to implement dynamic column visibility. The documentation reveals other dedicated examples for features like sorting, remote data, custom formatting, etc., so this example doesn't need to incorporate those aspects.
The current implementation with 4 rows is sufficient as:
- It provides enough data to demonstrate the column toggling behavior
- It aligns with other examples in the documentation that use similar data volumes
- More complex scenarios like scrolling and virtualization have their own dedicated examples
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are other DataGrid examples that might overlap with this one
fd -e razor -e cs "DataGrid.*Examples" | grep -v "DynamicColumns"
# Look for any documentation about DataGrid features that might be missing from this example
rg -i "datagrid.*feature|feature.*datagrid" docs/
Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for DataGrid examples and documentation
fd "DataGrid" docs/
# Search for any DataGrid-related files to understand the feature set
rg -l "DataGrid" docs/
# Look for any documentation about features in markdown files
fd -e md . docs/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 4330
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of a few key example files to understand the feature coverage
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Usage.razor"
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Sorting.razor"
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/RemoteDataSource.razor"
# Also check the main DataGrid documentation
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/DataGrid.razor"
Length of output: 13728
docs/LumexUI.Docs/Program.cs (1)
12-12: Verify DataGrid's HTTP client usage.
Let's verify how the DataGrid component utilizes this HTTP client to ensure proper implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual content of those files to understand how HttpClient is being used in the DataGrid examples.
HttpClient usage in DataGrid examples is properly implemented
The DataGrid component examples demonstrate correct usage of the injected HttpClient for remote data fetching:
- Both examples inject HttpClient via dependency injection
- They use type-safe JSON deserialization with GetFromJsonAsync
- Proper cancellation token support for request cancellation
- Appropriate error handling through nullable types
- Examples showcase different pagination approaches (server-side with FDA API and client-side with SWAPI)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how the DataGrid component uses IHttpClientFactory or HttpClient
# Look for HttpClient usage in DataGrid-related files
echo "Searching for DataGrid files that use HttpClient..."
rg -l "DataGrid" | xargs rg -l "HttpClient"
# Look for IHttpClientFactory injection in DataGrid-related files
echo "Searching for IHttpClientFactory usage in DataGrid..."
rg -l "DataGrid" | xargs rg -l "IHttpClientFactory"
# Look for potential remote data fetching methods in DataGrid
echo "Searching for potential data fetching methods..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
async $_(HttpClient $_) {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 674
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the files that use both DataGrid and HttpClient
echo "Content of RemoteDataSource.razor:"
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/RemoteDataSource.razor"
echo -e "\nContent of Virtualization.razor:"
cat "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Virtualization.razor"
Length of output: 3460
src/LumexUI/Common/Events/DataGridRowClickEventArgs.cs (2)
1-4: LGTM! Clean namespace organization.
The namespace organization follows C# conventions and the using directive is appropriately placed.
10-11: Justify exclusion from code coverage.
While event args classes are often simple data carriers, excluding them from code coverage should be justified. Consider if there's value in testing edge cases, especially with generic types.
✅ Verification successful
ExcludeFromCodeCoverage attribute is consistently used across the codebase
The attribute usage aligns with the project's patterns where it's applied to:
- UI component slots (e.g., CardSlots, CheckboxSlots)
- Style definitions (e.g., Button, Card, Navbar)
- Utility classes (e.g., ColorUtils, TypeExtensions)
- Event args classes (as in this case)
The consistent usage across similar types suggests this is an intentional architectural decision for UI-related classes that primarily serve as data carriers or structural elements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other event args classes are also excluded from coverage
rg -l "ExcludeFromCodeCoverage.*EventArgs" --type cs
Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for EventArgs classes first
rg "class.*EventArgs" --type cs -B 1
# Also search for ExcludeFromCodeCoverage attribute usage patterns
rg "\[ExcludeFromCodeCoverage\]" --type cs -A 1
Length of output: 6771
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/StickyHeader.razor (1)
1-35: Verify implementation completeness against requirements
While this example demonstrates the sticky header feature, please ensure all requirements from issue #99 are covered, including sorting and comparing functionalities.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Shadows.razor (1)
33-38: Verify Shadow enum and component registration.
Ensure that the Shadow enum and LumexDataGrid component are properly registered and accessible.
✅ Verification successful
Shadow enum and LumexDataGrid component are properly integrated
The verification confirms that:
- The Shadow enum is properly defined in
src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/Shadow.cswith all required values (None, Small, Medium, Large). - The LumexDataGrid component correctly uses the Shadow enum as a parameter with a default value of
Shadow.Small. - The component is extensively used across multiple examples and tests, including the Shadows.razor example that demonstrates the Shadow functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Shadow enum definition
rg -t cs "public enum Shadow"
# Check for LumexDataGrid component registration
rg -t cs "builder\.Register<LumexDataGrid>"
Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Shadow enum implementation
cat src/LumexUI/Common/Enums/Shadow.cs
# Check for DataGrid component registration in different patterns
rg -t cs "AddLumexDataGrid|services\.Add.*DataGrid|builder\.Add.*DataGrid"
# Check for DataGrid component usage
rg -t razor "<LumexDataGrid"
Length of output: 433
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for DataGrid component usage with proper extension
rg "<LumexDataGrid" --type-add 'razor:*.razor'
# Look for DataGrid component definition
fd -e cs -e razor "LumexDataGrid.razor" -x cat {}
Length of output: 33882
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/_Radius.razor (1)
1-1: Verify component dependencies.
Let's verify that the required components and enums are properly defined in the system.
Also applies to: 33-38
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the LumexDataGrid component using a different search pattern.
Dependencies are properly defined and integrated
The verification confirms that both required dependencies exist in the codebase:
LumexDataGridcomponent is defined insrc/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/LumexDataGrid.razor.csRadiusenum is defined insrc/LumexUI/Common/Enums/Radius.cs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if LumexDataGrid component exists
ast-grep --pattern 'class LumexDataGrid<TItem>'
# Check if Radius enum is defined
ast-grep --pattern 'enum Radius'
Length of output: 1618
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for LumexDataGrid component with a more flexible pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'class LumexDataGrid'
# Also search using ripgrep to catch any other definitions
rg "class.*LumexDataGrid" -A 5
Length of output: 16012
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor (3)
1-4: LGTM! Component declaration follows best practices.
The component is properly structured with appropriate inheritance and generic type parameters.
6-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using @base syntax instead of direct method call.
Direct calls to base.BuildRenderTree might bypass important Razor component lifecycle events. Consider using the @base syntax instead:
-@{
- base.BuildRenderTree( __builder );
-}
+@base {
+ <text>@base</text>
+}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
30-31: Verify delegate lifecycle management.
The _setTextProperty and _setNumericProperty delegates are used but their initialization and cleanup are not visible. Ensure proper lifecycle management to prevent memory leaks.
Also applies to: 40-41
✅ Verification successful
Delegate lifecycle is properly managed
The delegates _setTextProperty and _setNumericProperty are safely managed:
- They are initialized only when the Property parameter changes (tracked by
ProperyHasChanged) - They are stateless delegates created from compiled expressions
- No explicit cleanup is needed as they don't hold any unmanaged resources or event subscriptions
- The delegates are scoped to the component's lifetime and will be garbage collected with the component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for delegate field declarations and cleanup
ast-grep --pattern 'private Action<$_, $_>? _setTextProperty;'
ast-grep --pattern 'private Action<$_, $_>? _setNumericProperty;'
ast-grep --pattern 'protected override void Dispose($_)'
Length of output: 191
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the file content to understand delegate initialization and usage
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor
# Search for similar patterns in other files
rg "_setTextProperty" --type cs --type razor -C 5
rg "_setNumericProperty" --type cs --type razor -C 5
Length of output: 1644
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the base class and delegate initialization
rg "PropertyColumn" -l
cat $(rg "PropertyColumn" -l | head -n 1)
# Try searching without file type specification
rg "_setTextProperty"
rg "_setNumericProperty"
Length of output: 14478
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the CreateSetter method and initialization
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor.cs
# Check if there's any disposal or cleanup in base class
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor.cs
Length of output: 8156
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/ToolbarContent.razor (1)
1-21: Verify DataGrid component integration
Let's verify that all required features of the DataGrid component are properly implemented according to the requirements.
✅ Verification successful
DataGrid component integration is properly implemented
The implementation shows correct usage of the DataGrid component with proper integration of the ToolbarContent feature. The component correctly implements:
- The ToolbarContent slot in the base component
- Proper data binding with FilteredUsers
- Standard column definitions using PropertyColumn
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all required DataGrid features are implemented
echo "Checking for required DataGrid features..."
# Look for sorting implementation
echo "Checking sorting implementation..."
rg -l "SortDirection|ISortable|Sort[A-Z]" --type razor
# Look for data comparison features
echo "Checking comparison features..."
rg -l "Compare|Comparison" --type razor
# Look for action handling
echo "Checking action handling..."
rg -l "OnAction|HandleAction|Action[A-Z]" --type razor
# Check for other DataGrid examples
echo "Checking other examples..."
fd -e razor -p "**/DataGrid/Examples/*.razor"
Length of output: 976
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find DataGrid-related files and their implementations
# Find all Razor files
echo "Finding all Razor files..."
fd ".razor$"
# Look for DataGrid-related patterns
echo -e "\nChecking DataGrid implementations..."
rg -l "LumexDataGrid"
# Look for specific features in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking for specific features..."
rg -l "ToolbarContent|PropertyColumn|FilteredUsers"
Length of output: 31721
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the DataGrid component implementation and the example more closely
# Check the DataGrid component implementation
echo "Checking DataGrid component implementation..."
rg -p "ToolbarContent|FilteredUsers" "src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/LumexDataGrid.razor"
# Check the example implementation
echo -e "\nChecking example implementation..."
rg -p "ToolbarContent|FilteredUsers" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/ToolbarContent.razor"
# Check for any related test cases
echo -e "\nChecking test cases..."
rg -p "ToolbarContent|FilteredUsers" "tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DataGrid/DataGridTests.razor"
Length of output: 721
src/LumexUI/Components/Checkbox/LumexCheckbox.razor (2)
11-11: LGTM! Addition of @attributes follows Blazor best practices
The addition of @attributes="@AdditionalAttributes" enhances component flexibility by allowing pass-through of custom HTML attributes.
12-12: Verify integration with DataGrid row selection
The addition of @onclick:stopPropagation="@true" is correct for preventing event bubbling. Let's verify its interaction with DataGrid row selection functionality.
✅ Verification successful
The addition of @onclick:stopPropagation="@true" in the checkbox is correctly implemented and verified
Based on the DataGrid implementation and tests, the stopPropagation on the checkbox is necessary and works correctly with row selection:
- The DataGrid supports row selection through both row clicks and checkbox clicks
- The checkbox column is specifically designed to handle selection independently (
_CheckboxColumn) - Tests verify that both mechanisms work correctly:
ShouldSelectRowOnCheckboxClickShouldSelectRowOnClick
The stopPropagation is essential to prevent the row click event from firing when clicking the checkbox, which would otherwise cause both events to trigger and potentially interfere with the selection logic.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if DataGrid implements row selection and how it handles click events
# Look for row selection handling in DataGrid components
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
OnRowClick($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check for other click event handlers that might be affected
rg -A 5 "onclick" --type razor
Length of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any DataGrid component files
fd -e razor DataGrid
# Search for click event handlers in all files (without file type filter)
rg -l "onclick"
# Search specifically for row selection related code
rg -i "rowselect|selectrow|selectedrow"
Length of output: 2219
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the DataGrid test file to understand row selection behavior
cat tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DataGrid/DataGridTests.razor
# Also check the actual DataGrid implementation
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/LumexDataGrid.razor
Length of output: 30038
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/SingleSelection.razor (1)
1-68: Add unit tests for the demo component
Consider adding unit tests to verify:
- Single selection functionality works as expected
- Color theme changes are applied correctly
- Selected user display updates properly
Let me help you find any existing tests for this component:
Would you like me to help create a test suite for this component?
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/MultipleSelection.razor (1)
1-68: Verify component dependencies and integration.
Let's ensure that all required components and types are properly available and imported.
✅ Verification successful
Component dependencies and integration are properly configured
The verification confirms that all required components and types are correctly integrated:
LumexDataGridcomponent is properly defined and extensively used across the codebaseThemeColorenum is defined insrc/LumexUI/Common/Enums/ThemeColor.csSelectionModeenum is defined insrc/LumexUI/Common/Enums/SelectionMode.cs- Multiple selection functionality is well-tested as evidenced by test cases in
DataGridTests.razor
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence and usage of ThemeColor enum and LumexDataGrid component
# Check for ThemeColor enum definition
echo "Checking ThemeColor enum definition..."
rg -p "enum\s+ThemeColor\s*{"
# Check for LumexDataGrid component definition
echo "Checking LumexDataGrid component definition..."
rg -p "LumexDataGrid\s*[<{]"
# Check for other examples using similar patterns
echo "Checking for similar usage patterns in other files..."
fd -e razor -e cs | xargs rg "SelectionMode.Multiple"
Length of output: 6079
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify ThemeColor enum with a corrected pattern and check its usage
echo "Checking ThemeColor enum definition..."
rg "enum.*ThemeColor"
# Also check for any imports or usings related to ThemeColor
echo "Checking ThemeColor imports/usings..."
rg "using.*ThemeColor|@using.*ThemeColor"
# Check if SelectionMode is properly defined
echo "Checking SelectionMode definition..."
rg "enum.*SelectionMode"
Length of output: 479
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Virtualization.razor (1)
1-2: Consider adding error handling for dependency injection
The HttpClient injection should be handled gracefully in case of initialization failures.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Components/NavMenu.razor (1)
62-62: Verify NavItemBadge implementation for all status values.
Ensure that the NavItemBadge component properly handles all possible NavItemStatus values, particularly for the new DataGrid preview status.
✅ Verification successful
NavItemBadge properly handles all possible status values
The NavItemBadge component correctly implements handling for both possible NavItemStatus values:
NavItemStatus.SoonNavItemStatus.Preview
The component includes appropriate styling variants for both states and properly renders the status text with consistent formatting. The implementation is complete and matches the requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NavItemBadge implementation and status handling
ast-grep --pattern 'enum NavItemStatus {
$$$
}'
# Check NavItemBadge implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class NavItemBadge {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NavItemStatus enum with ripgrep
rg -A 5 "enum NavItemStatus"
# Search for NavItemBadge component implementation
fd "NavItemBadge.razor" --exec cat {}
# Search for any Status property usage in NavItemBadge
rg -A 3 "Status.*NavItemStatus"
Length of output: 1725
src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexColumnBase.razor (1)
1-3: Verify DataGrid integration mechanism
Let's verify how columns are managed in the DataGrid component.
✅ Verification successful
Column integration with DataGrid is properly implemented
The verification shows a well-structured integration between columns and DataGrid:
- Columns have proper cascading parameter injection:
[CascadingParameter] internal DataGridContext<T> Context - Column initialization is validated in
OnInitialized() - DataGrid has column management through
AddColumnmethod - DataGridContext provides column collection notification through
ColumnsFirstCollectedevent
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DataGrid component implementation and column management
ast-grep --pattern 'class DataGrid {
$$$
AddColumn($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for column registration patterns
rg -A 5 "AddColumn|RemoveColumn" --type cs
Length of output: 9503
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for column registration/unregistration in LumexColumnBase
ast-grep --pattern 'class LumexColumnBase {
$$$
OnInitialized() {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check for DataGrid parameter/cascading parameter in LumexColumnBase
rg -A 5 "\[CascadingParameter\].*DataGrid" --type cs
# Check for column lifecycle methods
rg -A 5 "OnInitialized|OnParametersSet|Dispose" src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexColumnBase.razor
Length of output: 1449
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the LumexColumnBase.razor.cs file for lifecycle methods
rg -A 10 "protected override.*OnInitialized|protected override.*OnParametersSet|public void Dispose" src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexColumnBase.razor.cs
# Check DataGridContext implementation for column management
rg -A 10 "class DataGridContext" --type cs
# Check for column registration in OnAfterRender
rg -A 5 "OnAfterRender" src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexColumnBase.razor.cs
Length of output: 1046
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/_CheckboxColumn.razor.cs (2)
1-15: LGTM! Well-structured class declaration with proper documentation.
The class is properly documented with XML comments, and the naming convention suppression is justified for internal use.
1-92: Verify test coverage for the CheckboxColumn component.
Let's ensure proper test coverage exists for this component, especially for selection logic and edge cases.
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage for _CheckboxColumn component is comprehensive
The component is well-tested through DataGridTests.razor with multiple test cases covering:
- Single and multiple selection modes
- Selection/deselection via checkbox clicks
- Select all functionality
- Disabled items handling
- Row selection events
- Selected items binding
The test suite includes:
ShouldSelectRowOnCheckboxClickShouldSelectAllRowsOnHeaderCheckboxClickShouldDeselectRowOnCheckboxClickShouldDeselectAllRowsOnHeaderCheckboxClickShouldNotSelectDisabledRowOnClick
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files related to CheckboxColumn
fd -e cs -e razor "CheckboxColumn.*Tests?"
# Search for test methods covering checkbox functionality
rg -l "CheckboxColumn|SelectItem|SelectAll" -g "*Tests.cs"
Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Try a broader search for test files
rg -l "_CheckboxColumn" -g "*.Tests.cs"
# Search for test files in test directories
fd -e cs "Tests?" --full-path ".*[Tt]est.*"
# Look for specific test method names related to checkbox functionality
ast-grep --pattern 'public void Test$$$CheckboxColumn$$$'
# Search for any references to checkbox-related tests
rg -i "checkbox.*test|test.*checkbox" -g "*.cs"
Length of output: 827
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the test files we found
cat tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/Checkbox/CheckboxTests.cs
# Let's also search for any DataGrid test files that might contain checkbox column tests
rg -l "DataGrid.*Tests?"
# Search for test methods related to selection in DataGrid
ast-grep --pattern 'public void Test$$$Selection$$$'
Length of output: 4440
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the DataGrid test file content for selection-related tests
cat tests/LumexUI.Tests/Components/DataGrid/DataGridTests.razor
# Let's also search for any test files containing "Selection" in their name
fd -e cs -e razor "Selection.*Tests?"
# Search for any test methods containing selection-related assertions
rg "SelectItem|SelectAll|SelectedItems" -A 5 -g "*Tests*"
Length of output: 29130
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Common/Navigation/NavigationStore.cs (2)
21-21: LGTM! Status update for Customize Theme is appropriate.
The change to mark "Customize Theme" with NavItemStatus.Soon effectively communicates its upcoming availability to users.
36-36: LGTM! Status update for Numbox is appropriate.
The change to mark LumexNumbox<T> with NavItemStatus.Soon effectively communicates its upcoming availability to users.
src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor (2)
15-15: LGTM: Data attribute for hidden input type
The addition of the data-hidden attribute is a good practice for styling and accessibility purposes.
16-16: Verify the impact of stopping click event propagation
The addition of @onclick:stopPropagation="@true" prevents click events from bubbling up to parent elements. While this might be necessary for proper event handling within the DataGrid (e.g., preventing cell selection during editing), we should verify that it doesn't break any existing functionality.
Let's check for any components that might rely on click event bubbling from this input field:
✅ Verification successful
Stopping click propagation is necessary and correctly implemented
The verification reveals that stopping click propagation in LumexInputFieldBase is actually necessary and well-aligned with the DataGrid's implementation. The DataGrid itself uses @onclick:stopPropagation="@(column is IEditableColumn)" for editable cells, showing this is an intentional design pattern. This prevents cell click events from bubbling up to row click handlers (OnRowClickedAsync), which could interfere with editing operations.
Key findings:
- DataGrid implements specific cell-level click handling (
OnCellClicked) - Editable columns render input components (
LumexTextbox,LumexNumbox) that inherit fromLumexInputFieldBase - Click propagation is consistently stopped at both the cell and input field levels
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for parent components that might be affected by stopped click propagation
# Look for components that contain LumexInputFieldBase and handle click events
# Find files containing both LumexInputFieldBase and @onclick
rg -l "LumexInputFieldBase" | xargs rg -l "@onclick"
# Search for potential parent components using ast-grep
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : LumexInputFieldBase<$_>'
Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find usage patterns
# Find all files containing LumexInputFieldBase
echo "=== Files containing LumexInputFieldBase ==="
rg -l "LumexInputFieldBase"
# Look for usage of LumexInputFieldBase in Razor files
echo -e "\n=== Usage of LumexInputFieldBase in Razor files ==="
rg -t razor "LumexInputFieldBase" -A 5 -B 5
# Look for click event handlers in the same context
echo -e "\n=== Click event handlers near LumexInputFieldBase ==="
rg -t razor "@onclick" -A 5 -B 5
# Check the implementation of LumexInputFieldBase itself
echo -e "\n=== Content of LumexInputFieldBase.razor ==="
cat src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor
Length of output: 5381
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the inheritance and usage patterns more closely
# Check the base class implementation
echo "=== LumexDebouncedInputBase content ==="
rg -p "class LumexDebouncedInputBase" -A 10 -B 2
# Look for components that use LumexInputFieldBase
echo -e "\n=== LumexNumbox and LumexTextbox implementations ==="
cat src/LumexUI/Components/Numbox/LumexNumbox.razor
cat src/LumexUI/Components/Textbox/LumexTextbox.razor
# Check for click handlers in parent components
echo -e "\n=== Click handlers in components using LumexInputFieldBase ==="
rg "@onclick" src/LumexUI/Components/Numbox/LumexNumbox.razor src/LumexUI/Components/Textbox/LumexTextbox.razor
# Look for DataGrid usage since it was mentioned in the comment
echo -e "\n=== DataGrid usage with input components ==="
rg -l "DataGrid.*LumexInputFieldBase|LumexTextbox|LumexNumbox"
Length of output: 3695
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the DataGrid's EditColumn implementation and any click handling
# Check EditColumn implementation
echo "=== EditColumn.razor content ==="
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor
# Look for click event handling in DataGrid components
echo -e "\n=== Click handlers in DataGrid components ==="
rg -p "@onclick" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/
# Check if there's any cell selection logic
echo -e "\n=== Cell selection related code ==="
rg -p "cell.*selection|select.*cell" src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/
Length of output: 2284
src/LumexUI/Components/Bases/LumexInputFieldBase.razor.cs (2)
73-73: LGTM! Parameter changes are well-documented and follow best practices.
The default value for Behavior and the new Autofocus parameter are implemented correctly with proper XML documentation.
Also applies to: 101-105
Line range hint 1-324: Verify impact on derived components.
Since this is a base class, we should verify that the changes don't adversely affect any derived components, particularly around the autofocus behavior and disposal.
✅ Verification successful
No impact on derived components detected
The search results show that there are two derived components: LumexTextbox and LumexNumbox<TValue>, and neither of them override OnAfterRenderAsync or DisposeAsync. The changes in the base class are safe as:
- The autofocus behavior is handled entirely in the base class
- The disposal logic is contained within the base class and not overridden
- The derived components inherit these behaviors without modification
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all components that inherit from LumexInputFieldBase
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : LumexInputFieldBase<$_>'
# Find any components that might override OnAfterRenderAsync
ast-grep --pattern 'protected override Task OnAfterRenderAsync'
# Find any components that might override DisposeAsync
ast-grep --pattern 'public override ValueTask DisposeAsync'
Length of output: 185
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find derived components and potential overrides
# Search for files that might be using LumexInputFieldBase
rg -l "LumexInputFieldBase"
# Search for any class that inherits from LumexInputFieldBase with different syntax
rg "class.*:.*LumexInputFieldBase" -A 2
# Look for potential override patterns in the codebase
rg "override.*OnAfterRenderAsync|override.*DisposeAsync" -A 2
Length of output: 2420
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/DataGrid.razor (1)
4-5: Consider adding missing component imports.
The file uses various components like Code, Callout, etc., but their imports are not visible. Ensure all required components are properly imported.
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor.cs (1)
64-88: Verify correct handling of different property types in 'CreateSetter'
Ensure that the CreateSetter method correctly handles all possible types of P, including complex types and nullable value types, to prevent potential runtime exceptions.
Run the following script to identify all uses of EditColumn and check the types of P:
This will help confirm that CreateSetter accommodates all types used with EditColumn.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the implementation details and test cases, I can now provide a final response:
EditColumn implementation correctly handles property types with proper validation and type safety
The CreateSetter method has robust type handling:
- String properties are handled directly with no conversion
- Numeric properties use a null-safe conversion with proper type checking
- Invalid property expressions (non-member expressions) are caught early with clear error messages
- Complex types are handled through custom edit templates via the
EditContentparameter
The implementation is verified through test cases showing various scenarios including:
- Basic string/numeric properties
- Custom formatting
- Custom edit templates
- Invalid expressions (with proper error handling)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of 'EditColumn' and list the types used for 'P'
# Find all razor files using 'EditColumn' and extract the generic type arguments
rg -o 'EditColumn<[^>]+>' -r '$0' **/*.razor | sort | uniq
Length of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find EditColumn usages
# First, let's find all razor files that might contain EditColumn
fd "\.razor$" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "EditColumn" "$file" -A 2 || true
done
# Also search for any C# files that might use EditColumn
fd "\.cs$" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "EditColumn" "$file" -A 2 || true
done
# Let's also examine the EditColumn class implementation to understand supported types
echo "=== EditColumn Implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class EditColumn {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 140595
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the EditColumn implementation and its usage more closely
# First, let's look at the full implementation of EditColumn.razor.cs
echo "=== EditColumn.razor.cs content ==="
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor.cs
# Let's also check the EditColumn.razor template
echo -e "\n=== EditColumn.razor content ==="
cat src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/EditColumn.razor
# Let's look for any example usages in test files
echo -e "\n=== Test usages ==="
rg "EditColumn.*Property.*=>" -A 2 tests/
Length of output: 7310
| <PreviewCode Code="@new(name: null, snippet: "DataGrid.Code.Striped")"> | ||
| <LumexUI.Docs.Client.Pages.Components.DataGrid.Examples.Striped /> | ||
| </PreviewCode> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Code snippet reference needs to be updated
Based on the verification results:
- The Striped example component exists at
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Striped.razor - The code generator (
CodeSnippets.cs) automatically generates HTML files from example components in theCodedirectory - The snippet reference
DataGrid.Code.Stripeddoesn't match the actual generated path pattern
The PreviewCode component should reference the HTML file that matches the generator's output path pattern, which would be in the Code directory with a .html extension.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the existence of the referenced code snippet.
The component references a code snippet with key "DataGrid.Code.Striped". Let's ensure this snippet exists in the codebase.
Let me gather more information to verify the code snippet's existence.
Let me check one more location where code snippets might be defined.
Let me check the content of the CodeSnippets file to verify if the snippet is defined there.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the Striped code snippet
# Search for the snippet definition
echo "Searching for DataGrid.Code.Striped snippet definition:"
rg -l "DataGrid\.Code\.Striped" --type=json --type=cs
# Check if the Striped example component exists
echo "Verifying Striped example component:"
fd -e cs -e razor "Striped.razor" "docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples"
Length of output: 427
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for code snippet definitions in resource files
echo "Searching for code snippet definitions in resource files:"
fd -e resx -e resources -e json . | xargs rg -l "DataGrid\.Code\.Striped"
# Check the content of the Striped example component
echo "Content of Striped example component:"
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/Pages/Components/DataGrid/Examples/Striped.razor
Length of output: 960
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for code snippets in a common location for documentation
echo "Checking for code snippets in documentation resources:"
fd -e cs "CodeSnippets.cs" "docs"
# Also check for any .razor files that might contain the snippet definition
echo "Checking for potential snippet definitions in Razor files:"
rg -l "DataGrid\.Code\.Striped" --type=razor
Length of output: 398
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of CodeSnippets.cs
echo "Content of CodeSnippets.cs:"
cat docs/LumexUI.Docs.Generator/CodeSnippets.cs
Length of output: 3411
| @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| var builder = WebAssemblyHostBuilder.CreateDefault( args ); | |||
|
|
|||
| builder.Services.AddHttpClient(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Version mismatch detected - Microsoft.Extensions.Http 9.0.0 incompatible with .NET 8.0
The project targets .NET 8.0 but uses Microsoft.Extensions.Http 9.0.0, which is designed for .NET 9.0. This version mismatch could lead to runtime issues. Please downgrade to Microsoft.Extensions.Http 8.0.0 to maintain version alignment with other .NET 8.0 packages in the project.
docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/LumexUI.Docs.Client.csproj: Update package reference to use version 8.0.0
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify .NET version compatibility
The HTTP client registration is correctly placed in the DI container. However, let's verify the compatibility of the Microsoft.Extensions.Http package version (9.0.0) with the project's target framework.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the target framework version in the project file
rg -A 1 "TargetFramework" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/LumexUI.Docs.Client.csproj
# List all package references to check version alignment
rg "PackageReference" docs/LumexUI.Docs.Client/LumexUI.Docs.Client.csproj
Length of output: 473
| @namespace LumexUI | ||
| @inherits LumexColumnBase<T> | ||
| @typeparam T | ||
| @typeparam P |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add documentation and review generic parameters usage
- The generic parameter
Pis declared but not used in the implementation. - Missing XML documentation for the component describing its purpose and usage.
- Consider adding appropriate constraints for generic parameters if they're meant to work with specific types.
Consider applying these changes:
@namespace LumexUI
+/// <summary>
+/// A column component that renders property values in a data grid.
+/// </summary>
+/// <typeparam name="T">The type of data items in the grid.</typeparam>
@inherits LumexColumnBase<T>
@typeparam T
-@typeparam PCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @code { | ||
| /// <inheritdoc /> | ||
| protected internal override void RenderCellContent( RenderTreeBuilder __builder, T item ) | ||
| { | ||
| if( Content is not null ) | ||
| { | ||
| @Content( item ) | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| @CellContent( item ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance method documentation and error handling
The current implementation could benefit from better documentation and error handling:
- Missing XML documentation for the override
- No null check for
CellContent - No error handling for delegate invocation
Consider applying these improvements:
@code {
- /// <inheritdoc />
+ /// <summary>
+ /// Renders the content of a cell for the specified item.
+ /// </summary>
+ /// <param name="__builder">The render tree builder.</param>
+ /// <param name="item">The data item to render.</param>
+ /// <exception cref="InvalidOperationException">Thrown when neither Content nor CellContent is defined.</exception>
protected internal override void RenderCellContent( RenderTreeBuilder __builder, T item )
{
if( Content is not null )
{
@Content( item )
}
- else
+ else if( CellContent is not null )
{
@CellContent( item )
}
+ else
+ {
+ throw new InvalidOperationException("Either Content or CellContent must be defined.");
+ }
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @code { | |
| /// <inheritdoc /> | |
| protected internal override void RenderCellContent( RenderTreeBuilder __builder, T item ) | |
| { | |
| if( Content is not null ) | |
| { | |
| @Content( item ) | |
| } | |
| else | |
| { | |
| @CellContent( item ) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| @code { | |
| /// <summary> | |
| /// Renders the content of a cell for the specified item. | |
| /// </summary> | |
| /// <param name="__builder">The render tree builder.</param> | |
| /// <param name="item">The data item to render.</param> | |
| /// <exception cref="InvalidOperationException">Thrown when neither Content nor CellContent is defined.</exception> | |
| protected internal override void RenderCellContent( RenderTreeBuilder __builder, T item ) | |
| { | |
| if( Content is not null ) | |
| { | |
| @Content( item ) | |
| } | |
| else if( CellContent is not null ) | |
| { | |
| @CellContent( item ) | |
| } | |
| else | |
| { | |
| throw new InvalidOperationException("Either Content or CellContent must be defined."); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
| .scrollbar { | ||
| @apply scrollbar:h-2 scrollbar:w-2 scrollbar-thumb:rounded scrollbar-thumb:bg-foreground-200 scrollbar-track:rounded scrollbar-track:bg-foreground-100; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Browser compatibility and accessibility concerns identified
The scrollbar implementation relies solely on WebKit-specific pseudo-elements (::-webkit-scrollbar), which has limited browser support. The current implementation:
- Only works in WebKit-based browsers (Chrome, Safari, Edge)
- Lacks fallback styles for Firefox and other browsers that use
scrollbar-widthandscrollbar-color - Has no explicit accessibility considerations for contrast ratios
To ensure cross-browser compatibility and accessibility:
- Add Firefox-compatible scrollbar styling using
scrollbar-widthandscrollbar-color - Ensure the color contrast between
bg-foreground-200(thumb) andbg-foreground-100(track) meets WCAG guidelines - Consider adding a media query for users who prefer reduced motion
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify browser compatibility and accessibility.
Please ensure that:
- The scrollbar styling works consistently across different browsers
- The scrollbar remains visible and usable for accessibility purposes
- There's sufficient contrast between the thumb and track colors
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check browser compatibility by looking for vendor prefixes or alternative styles
# Check if there are any browser-specific scrollbar styles
rg -l "(::-webkit-scrollbar|scrollbar-color|scrollbar-width)" .
# Look for any accessibility-related configurations or comments
rg -i "(accessibility|a11y).*(scroll|overflow)" .
Length of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the tailwind configuration to understand the scrollbar implementation
cat ./docs/LumexUI.Docs/tailwind.config.js
# Also check if there are any related utility classes or documentation
rg -A 5 -B 5 "scrollbar" .
Length of output: 10213
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/LumexUI/Components/DataGrid/Columns/PropertyColumn.razor.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
desmondinho
temporarily deployed
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Closes #99
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
NavItemStatusenumeration to represent navigation item statuses (Soon, Preview).Pclass for enhanced data handling.NavItemBadgecomponent to visually display navigation item status.DataGriddocumentation page with detailed usage examples and features.SortDirectionandLayoutenumerations for improved data grid configuration.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style