New package: GRSuite v0.0.1

[JuliaRegistrator]

• Registering package: GRSuite
• Repository: https://github.com/AuroraDysis/GRSuite.jl
• Created by: @AuroraDysis
• Version: v0.0.1
• Commit: 2e211544c552d1bc5f7cb073229d54120be783c8
• Reviewed by: @AuroraDysis
• Reference: AuroraDysis/GRSuite.jl@2e21154#commitcomment-151062664
• Description: GRSuite.jl is a high-performance suite for solving PDEs with arbitrary precision.

[github-actions]

Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

1. New package registration

Please make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines.

2. AutoMerge Guidelines are all met! ✅

Your new package registration met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged when the mandatory waiting period (3 days) has elapsed.

3. To pause or stop registration

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add [noblock] in order to unblock auto-merging.

[AuroraDysis]

[noblock]

I want to use the name GRSuite.jl. Can anyone help me resolve the issue? I don't think it is similar to MLSuite.jl.

[kellertuer]

[noblock]
I feel the name is very unfortunate. There exists GR.jl, which might lead to the impression this is about a Suite for that, especially since GRUtils.jl does exist and does provide utilities for GR(.jl). Also “suite” could be _anything. So the name here is a (not unique) abbreviation together with a noun that provides no further information.

What about

• GeneralRelativity.jl? Or the other way around: What justifies the “suite” suffix? I think that is not necessary.
• GeneralRelativityPDEs.jl might also be nice, since for now the name does not indicate that this is about solving PDEs
• Relativia.jl was proposed on slack as well.

[aplavin]

IMO the GR/GRUtils conflict is quite strong. That's a very popular package, and also the default Plots backend.

I think the situation of GR.jl, GRSuite.jl, GRUtils.jl, GRTools.jl, etc where half of them are about plotting and half about general relativity isn't optimal and can easily lead to confusion :)
GR.jl is probably a historical artifact, currently General doesn't tend to accept 2-letter names – but it's here to stay.