Skip to content

Document that @spawnat :any doesn't do load-balancing #131

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

JamesWrigley
Copy link
Collaborator

Instead we point users to WorkerPool, which will do load-balancing.

Fixes #76, cherry-picked from JuliaParallel/DistributedNext.jl#22.

Instead we point users to `WorkerPool`, which will do load-balancing.
@JamesWrigley JamesWrigley added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 30, 2025
@JamesWrigley JamesWrigley self-assigned this Jan 30, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.32%. Comparing base (51e5297) to head (ba3c843).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #131   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.32%   79.32%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        1949     1949           
=======================================
  Hits         1546     1546           
  Misses        403      403           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JamesWrigley JamesWrigley merged commit ff8689a into master Jan 30, 2025
8 checks passed
@JamesWrigley JamesWrigley deleted the spawnat-docs branch January 30, 2025 11:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[feature request] Worker scheduler based on current load
2 participants