-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scanner object considering multiple coils #548
Draft
Stockless
wants to merge
15
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
scanner-develop
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cncastillo
requested changes
Mar 14, 2025
d84cb1e
to
be1d62b
Compare
…dd a getprperty to the Scanner.limits.symbol values.
cncastillo
requested changes
Mar 17, 2025
…mpact] and another small changes
cncastillo
requested changes
Mar 17, 2025
…sens for RFCoilSensDefinedAtPhantomPositions
cncastillo
requested changes
Mar 31, 2025
KomaMRIBase/src/datatypes/Scanner.jl
Outdated
@@ -108,6 +108,14 @@ function getproperty(sys::Scanner, key::Symbol) | |||
end | |||
end | |||
|
|||
function Base.setproperty!(sys::Scanner, key::Symbol, value) | |||
if key in fieldnames(HardwareLimits) | |||
setfield!(sys.limits, key, convert(Float64, value)) # Convert value to the correct type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't convert inside. This is going to generate type stability problems.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Solved at bbbb559
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Generation of a flexible and extensible Scanner object, to controll Hardware Limits, Gradient Behaviour, RF behaviour and magnetic field inhomegeneities.
Based in the pull request #454 and solving the issue #150 , this PR decouple the coils definition from the Phantom structure.
Clone this branch to test it using Julia Pkg: