Skip to content

Generalize sparse matmul #62

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2025
Merged

Generalize sparse matmul #62

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2025

Conversation

mtfishman
Copy link
Member

This helps with cases where the unstored elements aren't well defined to generate, for example block sparse matrix multiplication where the block type is abstract (ITensor/BlockSparseArrays.jl#150).

This also fixes an issue with printing sparse arrays where the elements are GPU arrays.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.70%. Comparing base (6738bee) to head (ec22c31).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #62      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.76%   76.70%   +0.93%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         586      601      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits          444      461      +17     
+ Misses        142      140       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 35.72% <81.25%> (+1.13%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit 00cac74 into main Jun 18, 2025
16 checks passed
@mtfishman mtfishman deleted the mf/generalize_matmul branch June 18, 2025 17:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant