Parameter-Dependent Integrals #1737
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
This PR adds two major lemmas for "Parameter-Dependent Integrals" (Chapter 12 of [1]). The first one "continuty lemma" says that if a (parameterized) function
u(x,t)is continuous (w.r.t.t), so is its integration (w.r.t.x). The second "differentiable lemma" says that its integration is differentiable if itself is, i.e. the derivative operation and integration is exchangeable:The above theorems are based on Lebesgue integration over a general measure space. Specializing it to
lborelwith the equivalence between Lebesgue and Guage integration used, we have the following two practical theorems (inexamples/probability/distributionTheory):where
diff1is a new overload ofdiffn 1(defined inlimTheory). And from the conclusion of the 2nd lemma it's easier to see howdiff1andintegralare exchanged. This lemma will play a crucial role in the remaining work of the CLT project.This is the first time I deal with proofs involving both Lebesgue integration and derivatives. Many new lemmas are either added manually or ported from HOL-Light. The proofs essentially depend on Lebesgue Dominated Convergence, which is improved now by moving one "integrable" condition from antecedents to conclusion:
One key device for proving the
differentiable_lemmais the following lemma added inreal_topologyTheory:HOL-Light has this lemma, but the porting progress was tried and failed due to some essential differences between HOL4's
netsTheoryand HOL-Light's nets formalization. I added some new definitions and theorems intonetsTheoryto try to fix the gaps. The work is not finished, but safe to merge. Now I decide to make a new proof (following another similar proof inreal_topologyTheory) to save time for more important work.--Chun
[1] Schilling, R.L.: Measures, Integrals and Martingales (Second Edition).
Cambridge University Press (2017).