Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EGU22 PyGMT short course information #131

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 21, 2022
Merged

Update EGU22 PyGMT short course information #131

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 21, 2022

Conversation

weiji14
Copy link
Member

@weiji14 weiji14 commented Mar 13, 2022

Include new date/time, GitHub repository and registration link. Also revised duration from 3.5 to 1.5 hours.

Include new date/time, GitHub repository and registration link. Also revised duration from 3.5 to 1.5 hours.
Comment on lines 32 to 34
The 1.5 hour long short course will be based on content adapted from https://github.com/GenericMappingTools/2021-unavco-course
and https://github.com/GenericMappingTools/foss4g2019oceania. Each of the 30 minute sessions will involve a
quick (~10 minute) walkthrough by the speaker, followed by a more hands-on session in breakout rooms where tutorial
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cc @leouieda, @meghanrjones, @andrebelem. Since our EGU22 short course duration is now 1hr 30min (90mins), does it make sense to have 3x 30min chunks? Or a 10min intro + 4x 20min sessions? What do you all think?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for my delay here ! @weiji14 I like the format 10+4x20. Last time I made something similar in python it worked well. It means we can work on blocks with enought time to show several application cases.
What do you think ? and @leouieda and @meghanrjones ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

10 min intro + 4x20 min sessions sounds good to me, though I think we could adjust this as needed when creating the content. Should we schedule a zoom or gather.town get-together on our own to include in this website announcement? It doesn't sound like the EGU virtual only events will have any automatic interactive component.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, looks like 10+4x20 has 3 points, but we'll still need to check with @leouieda if he's ok with doing the 1 out of 4 👋

An after-workshop get-together sounds good, I didn't attend vEGU21 last year, but I heard there was a gather.town. Could we just use that instead? Not quite sure how it would work to be honest.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, missed this thread completely. Are we doing separate recordings and then merging them for the upload? I can do 20 min, no problem. What’s the deadline for this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, we'll probably do separate recordings and merge them together. I've decided we should have an individual deadline on Friday 6 May 2022 to upload the recording, see the thread at GenericMappingTools/egu22pygmt#1 for more details.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏽

Copy link
Member

@maxrjones maxrjones left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be fun! 🎉

@weiji14 weiji14 marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2022 14:32
@weiji14
Copy link
Member Author

weiji14 commented Mar 21, 2022

Thanks @meghanrjones, could you merge this in please? Seems like I don't have permission on this repo.

Also, we should send out a Twitter announcement for this. I'll try and send one out this week or next, just a bit flat out with a hackweek this week.

@maxrjones
Copy link
Member

Thanks @meghanrjones, could you merge this in please? Seems like I don't have permission on this repo.

Also, we should send out a Twitter announcement for this. I'll try and send one out this week or next, just a bit flat out with a hackweek this week.

Sure, I'll merge it in. I also just updated the teams settings for this repository so you should be able to merge PRs in the future.

Do you want me to do the Twitter announcement to save you time? Good luck with the hackweek.

@maxrjones maxrjones merged commit 3c0b9b0 into GenericMappingTools:master Mar 21, 2022
@weiji14 weiji14 deleted the egu22pygmt branch March 21, 2022 19:05
@weiji14
Copy link
Member Author

weiji14 commented Mar 21, 2022

Do you want me to do the Twitter announcement to save you time? Good luck with the hackweek.

Oo yes that would be good. Just a short and sweet announcement will do 😄

@maxrjones
Copy link
Member

Do you want me to do the Twitter announcement to save you time? Good luck with the hackweek.

Oo yes that would be good. Just a short and sweet announcement will do 😄

Done at https://twitter.com/gmt_dev/status/1505989310595710980

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants