Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Lucene index scrubbing of missing entries #3009
Support Lucene index scrubbing of missing entries #3009
Changes from all commits
b7cdd80
76963d0
0927a48
d459697
edae52f
d2ea59e
1f53825
e8fd901
85ae0a0
f2ad50e
5e8dd92
5bae15a
384e890
cee4542
96e381f
9886520
3bb2beb
5df2180
ec07b3e
016b254
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I agree with your comment that extending
ValueIndexScrubbingToolsMissing
feels wrong.Perhaps a
BaseScrubbingToolsMissing
would make sense, although I think the only method that actually should be shared isgetCursor
, so probably a utility class would make more sense.Leaving as you have it until we have a third
Missing
implementation also seems reasonable, as it might also align with better abstracting synthetic records in general for use across scrubbing, indexing and IndexMaintenance.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't notice until I went to look at the similarity between this and
ValueIndexScrubbingToolsMissing
, but you don't check the index filter before saving. I think that means you will have false-negatives if any index entries are filtered.It's probably worth adding a boolean field to
MyParentRecord
, and adding an additional parameter tosaveRecords
to save filtered out records, and change the index definition to filter out anything with that field set totrue
(maybe likeisHidden
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#3065