Skip to content

Remove one-shot alternate text parity snapshot test - #99545

Draft
sosek108 wants to merge 9 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:cleanup/remove-alternate-text-parity-snapshot
Draft

Remove one-shot alternate text parity snapshot test#99545
sosek108 wants to merge 9 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:cleanup/remove-alternate-text-parity-snapshot

Conversation

@sosek108

@sosek108 sosek108 commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

This is a stacked cleanup PR on top of #99062 (fix/search-adopt-lhn-alternate-text), which itself stacks on #99061.

#99061 introduced a one-shot snapshot parity test (tests/unit/ReportAlternateTextParityTest.ts + tests/unit/__snapshots__/ReportAlternateTextParityTest.ts.snap, 145 cases) whose only purpose was to prove the extraction of LHN alternate-text logic into ReportAlternateTextUtils was zero-diff.

#99062 introduced the permanent drift gate tests/unit/LhnSearchPreviewParityTest.ts, which asserts LHN === Search preview equality on live code and fully replaces the snapshot test's role. The one-shot snapshot test is now dead weight: every intentional preview change would force snapshot churn going forward.

This PR deletes the snapshot test and its snapshot file (single commit: a7695e1cbbe Remove one-shot alternate text parity snapshot test).

Note for reviewers: until #99062 merges to main, the diff against main also shows #99062's changes. Please review only the Remove one-shot alternate text parity snapshot test commit. Once #99062 merges, this branch will merge main and additionally remove the cspell.json ignore entry for the snapshot file (that line arrives on main via commit 7c5cdab9172, part of #99061).

Fixed Issues

$ #98958
PROPOSAL:

Tests

This is a deletion-only change with no user-facing behavior.

  1. Confirm tests/unit/ReportAlternateTextParityTest.ts and tests/unit/__snapshots__/ReportAlternateTextParityTest.ts.snap no longer exist on this branch.
  2. Run npx jest tests/unit/LhnSearchPreviewParityTest.ts and verify it still passes, confirming LHN/Search preview parity is still covered by the permanent drift gate.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant