Skip to content

[No QA] Docs updates for E/A#92499 exclude all-held reports from to-dos#93744

Draft
MelvinBot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
melvin-docs-allheld-todos
Draft

[No QA] Docs updates for E/A#92499 exclude all-held reports from to-dos#93744
MelvinBot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
melvin-docs-allheld-todos

Conversation

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Documentation updates for the behavior change in #92499, which excludes reports where every expense is on hold from the Submit, Approve, and Pay to-dos (Home For you, Inbox type-menu badges, and Search), and surfaces Remove hold as the report's primary action for all-held reports.

Changes

  • Expensify-Home-Overview.md — In the For you section, note that all-held reports are excluded from the Submit/Approve/Pay counts until the hold is removed. Added an FAQ entry "Why isn't a report showing in the For you section?".
  • Understanding-Report-Statuses-and-Actions.md — In the Held Expenses section, clarify that when every expense on a report is on hold, the primary action shows Remove hold instead of Submit/Approve/Pay, and the report is excluded from your to-dos until the hold is removed.

UI labels were verified against the app (unhold: 'Remove hold' in src/languages/en.ts).

Related


@allgandalf, please review the files changed and confirm they reflect the current behavior. Then mark this PR Ready for review.

Co-authored-by: Gandalf <allgandalf@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot MelvinBot added the HelpDot Apply this label if the issue relates to ExpensifyHelp label Jun 16, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot changed the title Docs updates for E/A#92499 exclude all-held reports from to-dos [No QA] Docs updates for E/A#92499 exclude all-held reports from to-dos Jun 16, 2026
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

HelpDot Apply this label if the issue relates to ExpensifyHelp

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants