Add Claude Code GitHub Workflow

[PrzemyslawKlys]

🤖 Installing Claude Code GitHub App

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow that enables Claude Code integration in our repository.

What is Claude Code?

Claude Code is an AI coding agent that can help with:

• Bug fixes and improvements
• Documentation updates
• Implementing new features
• Code reviews and suggestions
• Writing tests
• And more!

How it works

Once this PR is merged, we'll be able to interact with Claude by mentioning @claude in a pull request or issue comment.
Once the workflow is triggered, Claude will analyze the comment and surrounding context, and execute on the request in a GitHub action.

Important Notes

• This workflow won't take effect until this PR is merged
• @claude mentions won't work until after the merge is complete
• The workflow runs automatically whenever Claude is mentioned in PR or issue comments
• Claude gets access to the entire PR or issue context including files, diffs, and previous comments

Security

• Our Anthropic API key is securely stored as a GitHub Actions secret
• Only users with write access to the repository can trigger the workflow
• All Claude runs are stored in the GitHub Actions run history
• Claude's default tools are limited to reading/writing files and interacting with our repo by creating comments, branches, and commits.
• We can add more allowed tools by adding them to the workflow file like:

allowed_tools: Bash(npm install),Bash(npm run build),Bash(npm run lint),Bash(npm run test)

There's more information in the Claude Code action repo.

After merging this PR, let's try mentioning @claude in a comment on any PR to get started!

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[claude]

PR Review - Claude Code GitHub Workflow

Summary

This PR has been merged and aimed to add/update Claude Code integration workflows. However, the PR shows 0 additions and 0 deletions, which indicates the workflows were already in place.

Current Workflow Files Analysis

I've reviewed the existing Claude workflow files:

✅ .github/workflows/claude.yml - Good

• Interactive Claude assistant triggered by @claude mentions
• Properly configured for issue comments, PR comments, and reviews
• Correctly scoped permissions with actions: read for CI results
• Uses OAuth token from secrets securely

✅ .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml - Excellent

• Automatic PR review on opened and synchronize events
• Properly restricted to safe gh commands
• Comprehensive review checklist
• Contains helpful commented options for customization

[claude]

Recommendations for Future Improvements

1. Add CLAUDE.md Documentation 📝
The review workflow references a CLAUDE.md file that doesn't exist yet. Create one with:

• PowerShell coding standards for this project
• Module structure conventions
• Documentation requirements
• Testing expectations
• Naming conventions

2. Consider Workflow Scope 🎯
The auto-review workflow triggers on ALL PRs. Consider adding path filters for PowerShell files only, or filter by contributor type to avoid reviewing maintainer PRs.

3. Security - Rate Limiting ⚠️
Every PR synchronization triggers a Claude review. For active PRs with many commits, this could consume API credits quickly. Consider adding a concurrency group to cancel in-progress reviews.

4. Extend Allowed Tools 🔧
For PowerShell projects, Claude could benefit from being able to run PowerShell commands for linting or testing.

[claude]

Security & Performance Assessment

Security - ✅ Excellent

• OAuth token properly stored in secrets
• Restricted tool access via claude_args
• Read-only permissions except id-token: write (required for OIDC)
• No arbitrary code execution paths
• Proper permission scoping

Performance - ✅ Good

• fetch-depth: 1 for shallow clones
• Minimal permissions reduce attack surface

Minor Issue Found ⚠️
Neither workflow specifies error handling. Consider adding continue-on-error: true to prevent blocking PRs if Claude review fails.

Final Verdict

The existing workflows are well-structured and secure. The PR itself appears to have been empty, but the current state of the Claude integration is solid and follows GitHub Actions and Claude Code best practices. 🎉