Skip to content

Conversation

@strub
Copy link
Member

@strub strub commented Mar 19, 2024

No description provided.

@Boutry
Copy link
Contributor

Boutry commented Mar 19, 2024

Hi PY,

Did you replace the lengthy set calls by sequences of rewrites?

@Boutry
Copy link
Contributor

Boutry commented Mar 19, 2024

Also I might have some uncommitted proofs. I will check later today.

@strub
Copy link
Member Author

strub commented Mar 19, 2024

@Boutry I changed nothing. I just pulled out the PolyDiv file from the finite fields branch so that we can eventually merge it. What do you mean by "lengthly sets calls"?

@fdupress
Copy link
Member

I assume smt?

@Boutry
Copy link
Contributor

Boutry commented Mar 19, 2024

I assume smt?

Indeed. Got auto"corrected". Is there something to measure the duration of set calls atm? Maybe I do not need to replace them all if only a few take too much time.

We should also try and merge the field extension development at some point. After the 29th I can start by rebasing it. There were only a few admits left I think.

https://github.com/EasyCrypt/easycrypt/blob/3787dc9536faa1460783c1470618a0b59d72b4de/theories/algebra/Perms.ec

@strub
Copy link
Member Author

strub commented Mar 19, 2024

When the file compiles, we can start looking at smt calls :)

@strub
Copy link
Member Author

strub commented Mar 19, 2024

And yes, the ultimate goal is to merge the finite field theory. However, I'd like to merge polydiv first.

@strub
Copy link
Member Author

strub commented Aug 23, 2024

Going back to that. I don't think we need to pseudo-division (TL;DR we do crypto). I would like to prune that part and just to keep the division for k[x] for k a field. Moreover, a large of the results could be then directly imported for the GCD-domain theory.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants