CMORize CCI LST - Microwave products

[morobking]

Description

• Closes Update and/or add ESA CCI datasets required for CMUG OWP4.3 #4234 (partially)
• Link to documentation:

---

Before you get started

• ☝ Create an issue to discuss what you are going to do

Checklist

It is the responsibility of the author to make sure the pull request is ready to review. The icons indicate whether the item will be subject to the 🛠 Technical or 🧪 Scientific review.

• 🛠 This pull request has a descriptive title
• 🛠 Code is written according to the code quality guidelines
• 🛠 Documentation is available
• 🛠 Tests run successfully
• 🛠 The list of authors is up to date
• 🛠 Any changed dependencies have been added or removed correctly
• 🛠 All checks below this pull request were successful

New or updated recipe/diagnostic

• 🧪 Recipe runs successfully
• 🧪 Recipe is well documented
• 🧪 Figure(s) and data look as expected from literature
• 🛠 Provenance information has been added

New or updated data reformatting script

• 🛠 Documentation is available
• 🛠 The dataset has been added to the CMOR check recipe
• 🛠 The dataset has been added to the shared data pools of DKRZ and Jasmin by the @ESMValGroup/OBS-maintainers team
• 🧪 Numbers and units of the data look physically meaningful

---

To help with the number of pull requests:

• 🙏 We kindly ask you to review two other open pull requests in this repository

[morobking]

Unsure how to correct these comments from Prospector:
cmorizers/data/formatters/datasets/esacci_lst.py
cmorizers/data/formatters/datasets/esacci_lst.py
Line: 50
mccabe: MC0001 / cmorization is too complex (16)
pylint: unused-argument / Unused argument 'cfg_user' (col 38)
pylint: too-many-arguments / Too many arguments (6/5)
pylint: too-many-locals / Too many local variables (22/15)
pylint: too-many-positional-arguments / Too many positional arguments (6/5)
Line: 68
pylint: logging-fstring-interpolation / Use lazy % formatting in logging functions (col 16)

Line 50: are the unused arguments sent into the function by ESMValTool, or can they be removed?
Line 68: Don't know how to fix this.