Skip to content

[llmobs] Make quickstart actually quick #30472

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Kyle-Verhoog
Copy link
Member

@Kyle-Verhoog Kyle-Verhoog commented Jul 14, 2025

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

The quickstart guide was not quick at all.

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). Without this format, your pull request will not pass CI, the GitLab pipeline will not run, and you won't get a branch preview. Getting a branch preview makes it easier for us to check any issues with your PR, such as broken links.

If your branch doesn't follow this format, rename it or create a new branch and PR.

[6/5/2025] Merge queue has been disabled on the documentation repo. If you have write access to the repo, the PR has been reviewed by a Documentation team member, and all of the required checks have passed, you can use the Squash and Merge button to merge the PR. If you don't have write access, or you need help, reach out in the #documentation channel in Slack.

Additional notes

@Kyle-Verhoog Kyle-Verhoog requested review from cswatt and barieom July 14, 2025 23:59
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 14, 2025

✅ Documentation Team Review

The documentation team has approved this pull request. Thank you for your contribution!

Copy link
Contributor

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

Modified Files

@Kyle-Verhoog Kyle-Verhoog marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2025 14:11
@Kyle-Verhoog Kyle-Verhoog requested a review from a team as a code owner July 15, 2025 14:11
@iadjivon iadjivon added the editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review label Jul 15, 2025
@iadjivon
Copy link
Contributor

Editorial review card: DOCS-11508

@cswatt
Copy link
Contributor

cswatt commented Jul 15, 2025

I just made some mild formatting/grammar edits, no content changes. Let me know when this is ready to merge.

@shris-github
Copy link

I like we have simplified the instructions a lot with this update. Can we add a simple LLM call, say to OpenAI asking "what's the weather in NYC, today?", as an example request people can use to trace? I think it is small and easy enough for people to try who may not yet have an application handy at the moment, but would still like to kick the tires

@Kyle-Verhoog
Copy link
Member Author

Kyle-Verhoog commented Jul 15, 2025

@shris-github i think we should offer a different path for people looking to explore the product - like a live vscode env + temp demo org setup - rather than try to solve it with the "get started quickly in my app" purpose this doc has. Else customers will be confused why they need to install OpenAI to use LLMObs

@@ -63,7 +65,9 @@ LLM Observability requires a Datadog API key if you don't have an Agent running.
{{% /tab %}}
{{< /tabs >}}

3. Make requests to your application triggering LLM calls and then view traces in the **Traces** tab [of the **LLM Observability** page][3] in Datadog. If you don't see any traces, make sure you are using a supported library else you may need to instrument your application's LLM calls manually.
### View traces
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 nice - i like this change!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants