You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the suggestions, but I don't have time for them recently.
For (3), I actually did try it by hardcoding. It turns out that there are more "Basic" nodes than I thought. They don't seem to carry that much meaning.
I have implemented a new web explorer with a newer build of mathlib4.
In the recently build of mathlib4, almost all the nodes have a common parent Mathlib/Tactic/Linter/Header, and make it extremely large. To avoid this, i change the size to relate to the decl_count and the "Basic" nodes got a relative large weight. I am new to the mathlib4, are they the "primary concept nodes"?
Activity
Crispher commentedon Jun 2, 2024
Thanks for the suggestions, but I don't have time for them recently.
For (3), I actually did try it by hardcoding. It turns out that there are more "Basic" nodes than I thought. They don't seem to carry that much meaning.
ekibun commentedon Jan 17, 2025
I have implemented a new web explorer with a newer build of mathlib4.
In the recently build of mathlib4, almost all the nodes have a common parent Mathlib/Tactic/Linter/Header, and make it extremely large. To avoid this, i change the size to relate to the decl_count and the "Basic" nodes got a relative large weight. I am new to the mathlib4, are they the "primary concept nodes"?