update limits for blockhash, blockdata and blake prc

[letypequividelespoubelles]

No description provided.

[cla-assistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ fab-10
❌ letypequividelespoubelles
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[cla-assistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[letypequividelespoubelles]

@fab-10 do we care about all acceptance-test/*/limits.toml ? It seems they contain old name's module, so not sure they are really used ...

[fab-10]

@letypequividelespoubelles they are used by the ATs, the important thing is that they contain the right module names, while for the limits they are made up to adapt to the specific tests.
Why are you making these changes?

[letypequividelespoubelles]

@fab-10 There was a redesign of BLOCKDATAand BLOCKHASH, so I've updated the limits to accept the same number of module operations. BLAKEprecompile is not provable at the moment, so set the limit to 0.

[letypequividelespoubelles]

@fab-10 PHONEY_RLPand TX_RLP doesn't exist anymore (it's old names for RLP_TXN, should we delete those lines then ?

[fab-10]

@fab-10 PHONEY_RLPand TX_RLP doesn't exist anymore (it's old names for RLP_TXN, should we delete those lines then ?

yes thanks.

[fab-10]

@letypequividelespoubelles you need to sign the CLA if you want this merged