Skip to content

[WIP] Content tweaks #60

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 10, 2022
Merged

[WIP] Content tweaks #60

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 10, 2022

Conversation

shiffman
Copy link
Member

@shiffman shiffman commented Feb 9, 2022

No description provided.

@shiffman shiffman mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2022
@shiffman shiffman requested review from fdoflorenzano and augustkline and removed request for fdoflorenzano and augustkline February 10, 2022 18:21
@shiffman
Copy link
Member Author

sorry for all the review requests, i think the repo only allows one reviewer? I was just tagging you @fdoflorenzano and @klinegareth, this can be merged but not sure if we should wait until #63 is resolved?

@fdoflorenzano
Copy link
Collaborator

sorry for all the review requests, i think the repo only allows one reviewer? I was just tagging you @fdoflorenzano and @klinegareth, this can be merged but not sure if we should wait until #63 is resolved?

Yes, I think that free organizations can't have multiple reviewers in private repos. I'm OK with you merging this and me resolving #63 separately.

@shiffman
Copy link
Member Author

Ok merging now!

@shiffman shiffman merged commit eea3d1a into content Feb 10, 2022
@fdoflorenzano fdoflorenzano deleted the content-shiffman branch February 24, 2022 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants