README.md: Misc updates #491
Conversation
cgwalters
force-pushed
the
building
branch
2 times, most recently
from
dc415a1 to
f0004ed
Compare
|
|
||
| `podman build --security-opt=label=disable --cap-add=all --device /dev/fuse -f Containerfile.centos-stream9 -t localhost/centos-bootc:stream9` | ||
|
|
||
| NOTE: This will not work when using "podman machine" over the remote client |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is blowing up on a MAC?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well I didn't dig deep into debugging it honestly. On Linux at least I get a really weird error
error: Installing packages: Updating rpm-md repo 'baseos': metadata[process] already locked by /proc/self/exe(17)
I haven't even tried to debug but I suspect the problem has something to do with 9p (which has more bugs than virtiofs)...we need to convert podman-machine on Linux to use libvirt probably.
| ## More information | ||
| ## Generated container images | ||
|
|
||
| At the moment the main image is `quay.io/centos-bootc/centos-bootc:stream9` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Minor/optional: missing period.
| upstream operating systems. For now, this project acts as a more central | ||
| point for this across these distributions. | ||
|
|
||
| Current WIP documentation: <https://gitlab.com/bootc-org/fedora-bootc/docs> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't this link to the rendered docs instead?
|
|
||
| - [Containerfile.centos-stream9] | ||
| - [Containerfile.centos-stream10] | ||
| - [Containerfile.fedora-40] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should remove this one now.
|
|
||
| At the moment the main image is `quay.io/centos-bootc/centos-bootc:stream9` | ||
|
|
||
| ## Building |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, I hadn't paid attention to this PR until now but this section is similar to what I propose on the Fedora side in https://gitlab.com/fedora/bootc/base-images/-/merge_requests/6. I think (as done there) it'd be good to link to the relevant docs pages and mention that layering is the expected flow. WDYT about taking what I have there here, and moving the Mac bit into the docs so that the README stays shorter?
3 participants
No description provided.