Skip to content

CSSWG note #104

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

CSSWG note #104

wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

argyleink
Copy link
Collaborator

@argyleink argyleink commented Jul 15, 2024

fixes #103
draft preview: https://css-levels.netlify.app/

todo:

  • fix formatting of all the tables
  • review text with the group
  • update verbiage to use the word "eras" more
  • PR an edit that links to this note and also adds the note

@argyleink argyleink self-assigned this Jul 15, 2024
@argyleink argyleink added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 15, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@argyleink argyleink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for the reviews all, some suggestions and edits have been made 🤘🏻

@brechtDR
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi all, just a small bit of feedback, just to confirm:

The CSSWG defined CSS3 as "everything after CSS2"

To make it perfectly on point, should that be CSS2.1 ?
Based on this link

It’s been helpful for people to call CSS3, CSS4, and CSS5 as "eras,"

Just wondering if we should still mention the word era, I like it, but I know some had the feedback of an era being more a historical term. as an era is "a period of time beginning with some special date or event".
But this could become a special date of course

@subuhunter
Copy link
Collaborator

Agree with @brechtDR 's concern on era. But other than that this looks perfect IMO.

@argyleink argyleink marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2024 15:35
@brechtDR brechtDR self-requested a review September 25, 2024 15:36
Copy link

@rol4nd909 rol4nd909 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Go for it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Draft and PR a CSSWG note
7 participants